factbat.com

Congressman Ron Paul, a true conservative republican from the state of Texas, has been the voice of reason and sober analysis within this nation's legislative body for decades, indefatigably honoring his oath of office as he courageously and unceremoniously upholds, protects and defends the principles of equal opportunity and personal accountability outlined in the documents so long ago drafted by America's founding fathers. And he has done so with a grace and poise that is rarely, if ever, seen - and even less appreciated - on capitol hill.

Dr. Paul, an obstetrician (i.e. a champion of the gift of life) who has delivered thousands of babies during his fastidious career, is so dedicated to this country, and its promise of liberty, that he graciously eschews his own personal viewpoint on "right to life" out of respect for the constitutional values of autonomy and accountability which indelibly place the "power to choose" - and thus the duty to correct any inequity created - directly in the hands of the people and the state legislatures wherein they elect to reside.

His ability to speak, absent the aid of a teleprompter, on any topic, to large crowds of people, with credible confidence and accountability belies a noble soul which proves him to possess the leadership qualities of an illustrious Captain, commanding spirited action through example rather than callous threats and demands; thus courageously preserving life in the face of death rather than complacently delivering subjugate flesh to the slaughter.

Under a Ron Paul presidency, the power of this nation's national defense would exceed all others for the past fifty years, while simultaneously reducing the military budget by streamlining the chain of command, opening channels to communication rather than blind collaboration, and bringing nation-building troops back home where they are most needed.

Ron Paul is quite obviously a man who literally resonates with the principle forces of nature as he clearly defines his position to be that of a public servant who's unwavering compliance with the "truths we find to be self evident" prohibits him from misusing the Executive Office as a station of power.

It is the man who readily admits his powerlessness over others whom remains prepared to "hit the ground running" in defense of all.

Paul has been delivering the identical message of limited government, fiscal responsibility, legislative accountability, transparency, American self reliance, free market economy, auditing the Federal Reserve, and respecting the inalienable rights of all people, during his entire time in office. He is not simply mouthing the words like so many other candidates whom are now agreeing with Dr. Paul because his logical and ethical analogies have become popular sentiments.

Remarkably, one of the only accusations Paul's opponents can sling at him is that he is allegedly racist. And merely due to the fact that a few - less than objective - pamphlets which voiced concerns about the illicit actions of racial groups were printed with Dr. Paul's organization's name on them. And his opponents publicly accuse him of bigotry regardless of the fact that Dr. Paul has denounced the statements as obscene and unwarranted, and has explained that he never had any specific knowledge of the statements, or any direct affiliation with those who printed them.

Furthermore, Dr. Paul has always demonstrated a clearly unbiased character in both word and deed in all of his personal and professional affairs. And there is not one example anywhere of him ever behaving even remotely racist; either for or against anyone.

The first of two guarantees in this article is that Ron Paul does not even possess the ability to be a racist. His primary focus, directed pointedly at personal accountability and autonomy, does not provide the room necessary for a scope of racially biased dissemination; thus preventing him from discriminating against anyone based on a birthright attribute such as the color of their skin, their gender or nationality.

Some would also attempt to claim that Dr. Paul wants to "legalize drugs", insinuating that his supporters are merely criminals. However, this mendaciously deleterious sentiment - denigrating a great deal of law abiding, hard working and intelligent citizens of significant note - ignores Dr. Paul's conctrete Constitutional compliance, since he has only ever sought to "decriminalize" the act of smoking cannabis (as California has done), and informed the public that this nation's Constitution does not allow the government to prohibit, by law, the use of any illicit substance. This nation's founding documents only provide protection against the parameters of criminality, of which the "freedom of choice" issue of drug use does not even come close to satisfying.

His support for relaxing the government's strangle-hold on the illicite drug trade is the result of a reasonable and honorable position, wherein he realizes that Richard Nixon's profligate "War on Drugs" has shamelessly destroyed the lives of hundreds of millions of unwitting, emotionally exasperated, people, and literally overnight built the empires of the most brutal and powerful criminals this world has ever seen.

Those who have found themselves in an environment which drives them to seek escape from reality are not merely suffering from drug addiction. These people are an pervasive example of our most severe societal dysfunctions, and are easily rehabilitated when one truly disseminates a reasonable acount of their plight, thus seeking to indemnify the persons themselves rather than their addiction.

Ron Paul is a man who full-well understands the gravity of this nation's currently perilous situation, and the fact that "the government does not have the right to tell the people what to do", or what to like or not like. He realizes that it has been the government's excessive meddling in the personal affairs of the people which is responsible for the many meteoric eruptions and cataclysmic crashes - both social and economic - that have nearly torn this nation assunder over the last century.

The government's responsibilty is to uphold, protect and defend this nation's Supreme Law of the Land; namely, the United States Constitution. It is neither their right nor their responsibility to create special rules for specific groups of people or individuals, nor take sides on any issue other than that wich shall reflect the primary tenets of this nation's founding documents.

Unlike Dr. Paul, many in this nation's government exibit absolutely no respect, whatsoever, for The Constitution, or its principles. But, on the contrary, seek only to craft orations rife with empty words which they can spew upon the masses, riling them with obscenity in an effort to procure, or retain, a position of authority.

Unfortunately, this exposes the fact that America's citizens are the ones whom are, first and foremost, responsible for the corrupt debacle the government has become. Much like the majority of politicians, the majority of this nation's citizens have no respect for their Constitution, as they incessantly demand that those they vote for ignore their oath office, and instead act in deference to the collective bidding of constituents, regardless of whether their demands are Constitutional, or many times, even ethical.

Barrack Obama was primarily elected by people who were expecting him to take sides against those whom they despise. The majority of those who voted for Obama are people who live a vengeful and recalcitrant existence, blaming any number of people and places for their personal predicament. Many of these people are the "occupiers" and malcontents who believe that the government should be granted the power to take from the rich and give to the poor.

The majority of Obama's supporters appear to be shameless racists, and have been rewarded with extreme bigotry on many levels, regardless of the fact that Obama campaigned - quite deceptively - as the one who would end racism in this country. The problem is that Barack Obama's underlying message - for those who were listening - was that he would merely seek to tip the scales in the opposite direction.

Just as poorly motivated are those who voted for the George Bush's, primarily because they were both "company men" who could be counted on to accept personal rewards for protecting the criminal exploits of the bankers and Wall Street cronies, while simultaneously crafting a web of control that would allow the felonious Federal Reserve, the Clinton coddled IMF, and the Kissinger crafted Counsel on Foreign Relations to enter into unabashed nation building.

Truth be told, all of the Bush men are depraved hawks who are entirely willing to feed every last one of this nation's patriotic sons and daughters to the gold plated war machine that lines their pockets with oil-stained dollars.

Contrarily, Ron Paul is the kind of man who, as president of the United States, would actually save lives during any armed clash of ideals, by preventing naked aggression with reasonable conflict, and thus preserving humanity's natural proclivity to disagree. The man, himself, is an expression of progress in that he never attempts to avoid dissention, but rather welcomes it with aplomb. His unwavering respect for the purity of the argument sets him apart from nearly every other legislator on the hill.

Paul's decorum during nationally televised debates shows him to be an expressly shrewd negotiator who will not bend to weak winds, and will force any true threat to bellow its impediment. He, as a congressman, routinely votes against bills of his own crafting if other legislators have introduced unconstitutional amendments and pork barrel spending into its text in their attempt to sneak them through an unsuspecting body of voters.

Dr. Paul is, of course, a kind and sharp spoken man, his is the nature of a true closer. A man moved not by petty regards of blustering sycophants and despots, yet sensitive to the quizzical glance cast by the oft-disregarded and marginalized granite of this nation's foundation; the working class.

Ron Paul is a man who, as president, would steer America's ship back onto its initial course of true prosperity, braving the swells of carpetbaggers and califates which have smothered nearly all of the last ten presidencies with a mendacious morbidity of pleas for the plight of the poverty stricken and oppressed, cutting their cream nearly to the bottom

Ron Paul's message is that of capabilities rather than disabilities, heart rather than hope. His egalitarian presence, seasoned with a paucity of pragamatism, is the essence of a character rich in personal accountability, seeking to master the equations rather than pretend to manipulate the solutions.

This nation need not suffer the poor, but rather, properly reward the efforts of the many whom suffer the rich. Take not from the wealthy, for it is the frugal whom have gifted them their station. Men are not created equal, simply equally allowed. The essential formulae must be designed to shift the balance by reducing poverty with nothing more than an increase of equal opportunity, and thereby bless this nation, as it so well deserves.  

Take heart, one and all, for this nation is still so great that, against all odds, it created a Ron Paul...Yeah, baby!!! And he has been serving this nation like a benevolent and loving father for decades, shining like a beacon of liberty at the edge of a jetty staunchly piercing this nation's pounding sea of sanguine senility and powerful corruption.

The man possesses an unflappable courage few even understand, and is a leader of the finest order.

So the question remains; is America truly worthy of - or ready for - a "Ron Paul Presidency"?

This author worries that it is not. And for anyone who disagrees, I dare you...no, I double dare you, prove me wrong, and vote for this honorable man. Vote for an executive public servant who will hold you accountable to the principles you claim to fight for.

I challenge you all, prove your true worth. Prove you are a real American, and vote for a just commander in chief...vote for Ron Paul.

Guaranteed, once this nation gets a taste of Dr. Paul's executive office, his re-election will be by a landslide.

In a recent press conference, one ABC reporter asks Obama a pointed question concerning the administration's willingness to do nothing more than exacerbate the crisis in Libya.

Obama has done nothing but work against the legitimate people of that nation by irresponsibly engaging the situation and affecting the strategic balance in favor of Qaddafi, as the people now suffer from his ineptitude and disingenuous meddling; paying dearly for his mistakes, with thier lives.

"Are you concerned that because you've imposed all of these sanctions, that Qaddafi feels cornered and there's no other option in his mind but to keep fighting, keep fighting, and in the words of your director of national intelligence, he may have the fire power to potentially win this stand off with the rebels." the ABC reporter asked.

To which Obama nonchalantly replies "I do, I am concerned absolutely. And I think that's why it's so important for us not to stop where we are, but to continue to find options that will add additional pressure."

Except that all Obama does is stop. He does not follow any logical course to anywhere meaningful. The fact that he fought so hard to pass Obamacare shows that all he can do is complete a goal. He has no ability to truly chart a course without a specific point of reference directly in front of him. He will never be able to lead this nation. He will only drag it through the mud on his way to one mirage after another.

It must be understood that this Universe does not allow humanity to ever reach any goal. It is a farce that one has ever done so. This is due to the fact that the planet is constantly evolving on a course that is traveling over 167,000 miles per hour through space. This unequivocally guarantees that one cannot even walk from their front door to the mail box, because it will never be the same mailbox that it was when they left the porch.

Make no mistake about it, this is inexplicable fact, and to realize just what this implies is part of mastering one's destiny. Furthermore, it is imperative to truly understanding the Universe we live in.

Obama goes on to say that his options include "sending a clear message to those around Qaddafi, that the world is watching, and that we're paying attention, and that there have been referrals to the international criminal court."

However, Obama knows full well that too little to late is an effective strategy for fulminating extreme animosities. But then, Obama is well versed in this, and is a hater of the highest order.
 
His lack of action are extremely effective actions in themselves because of the influence of his position. For Obama to do nothing is one of the most decisive actions a president can take, and it is borderine criminality since he is in a position that is afforded various levels of immunity that can then be mechanized into a clear impunity. What a truly undesirable person this nation must tolerate for two more years.

Obama seriously needs to be impeached. But then this legislature will never do it, and for one reason only. They don't want to set a precedent for actually doing their job, primarily for fear that it will start a trend of actual accountability. Plus, any person impeached is never again allowed to hold any office of trust or profit in the United States, and that would start another trend of tossing the miscreant thugs in the echelons of American society straight into the gutter where they belong, and then they could never again be used as scapegoats. Deplorable, to say the least.

Conversely, the Libyan people in the east are experimenting with their new-found liberty, and being literally transformed in an instant into honorable, caring and insightful people that are finding compassion and hope welling up in their hearts for the people of Japan. It is occurring just as it should.

All people of the Earth must begin to understand just what freedom really is, and the power of personal responsibility and cooperation that is blossoms into. The indiscretions of a society are directly proportionate to denials of freedom...true freedom, not the plastic and corroded freedom that much of the United States is now apportioned.

Obama goes on to say "part of what we're gonna be wanting to do is to change the balance, not just militarily inside of Libya, but also to change the balance in terms of those who are around Qaddafi, and are thinking about what their future prospects are if they continue down the course that they're on."

What a completely ridiculous and apathetic statement. If the past four decades are any indication at all of just what one can expect, then Qaddafi's brutality and crimes against humanity will be rewarded with a fresh "stash" of weaponry and personnel supplied by the American Military Industrial Complex and whatever other sycophant bureaucracy can profit form more destruction and depravity in the world.

"But, Chuck, there's no doubt I am concerned about it. Qaddafi has, a....uh, a...uh, uh stash of weapons. He not only has some troops that remain loyal to him. But there's been reports that he's also been hiring mercenaries." Said Obama.

There are more than just reports. There are videos of the tactics of these mercenaries, and many of them were captured by rebels who video taped their statements.

Remarkably, Obama expects the nation to believe that he has not seen any intelligence that proves mercenaries have been employed by the Qaddafi regime. Moreover, reports should be reason enough to investigate the possibility and clearly identify the sources. However, Obama appears to have done absolutely nothing to properly address the matter, or exfoliate the intelligence.

Obama goes on to further prove he has no intention of doing anything that will have any true effect on Qaddafi's ability to massacre the people of Libya with weapons and bombs given to him by America, saying "even with the financial freeze that we've imposed, he still has some assets. The rebel groups are just now getting organized. And so we're gonna have to continue to apply pressure." He essentially admits his impotency.

The "rebels" were organized long ago, and Obama full well knows this to be a fact. The problem is that if his close advisors lied to him and used tainted intelligence that was crafted during the Iraq war and used to justify excessive military action that suppressed actions against the United States military for criminal acts in Iraq, then he is still accountable for his actions.

The intelligence that alleges that the majority of insurgency in Iraq was from East Libya is in no way credible, and Obama should damned well know this. However it is a convenient excuse for now suppressing the freedom Obama appears to loathe. His support of the protests in Wisconsin prove him to be a mere political soclialite who despises liberty for the people, but approves of unabashed free reign for those in positions of accountability.

Mostly though, Obama is a socialist at heart and will never divert from his primary goal of fomenting or exacerbating crises as a means of exploiting the people of the world and forcing them to seek desperate measures that the government can appear to save them from. He wishes to turn the people into supplicants whom turn to him for assistance in controling of the destruction his type have caused. Just more "crisis, reaction, solution" tactics that have been the mainstay of his kind for centuries.

Obama is a single dimension analyst who is driven by nothing more than idealism. He has absolutely no intuition or insight, and all of his ideas are based on what he considers to be a viable outcome. He is only concerned with following the trajectory of the model that can be designed to bring about specific allegations of expected goals.

This administration is such that it is only capable of defining a goal, and then taking actions that are expected to culminate in that goal, or something comparable.

It is more than clear that this administration has absolutely no intention of actually leading the United States on a course of constitutional values, or actually any values at all. At this point, nearly ever single action that has been taken throughout the Obama administration's time in the White House, shows a clear agenda that cannot be altered.

This could be due to outside influences, or simply a lack of ability to act according to a set logical and legitimate rules or policies. Obama's many lackadaisical responses to crises show clear signs of a criminal mind that has no intention of truly changing anything in America, but instead only taking advantage of the fact that the people of the nation were desperate for change.

What is most indicative of the Obama machine is that it is almost sadistically resistant to any change. Obama claims to be concerned about the Libyan peoples' plight, and their fight for freedom. However, he shows by his actions that he is hoping that Qaddafi will win and possibly suppress that extremely powerful wave of freedom that is sweeping across the region.

This freedom movement certainly does not fit in with any of the professed agendas of the Obama adminstration.

However, the truth is that the sea change that has begun will not be suppressed. It may be stalled occasionally during its tectonic tempest as the tides of the evolving concepts begin to ebb and flow as nature intended, however, in this superiorly educational existentialism it will never again be forced into the dungeons of docility that have so long barred the minds of the Middle East from its true heritage.

There must be growth and decay, and Obama will find that as the world turns his certain decay will take on a whole new meaning that he could never have imagined, given the fact that he only exists as a preposterously pragmatic fool who could not tell the difference between a result and a resolution.

To the world: take this lesson to heart. The truth is that "the ends does justify the means". The question posed so long ago to the entire population of the world, which asks "does the ends justify the means" was nothing but a trick.

The fact is that the ends can only reflect the means, there is no exception. Any claim that the destructive or oppressive, liberty robbing means are going to end in a good result has always been a bald faced lie.

When they say "trust me, this distasteful ingredient is needed to make the batter taste better", it is nothing but a ruse, and the batter never tastes better. The bitterness just gets blamed on the next administration.

The only thing the deceptive dealers of death and destruction were ever intending to do is divert people's attention from the fact that none of the promised results that were ever guaranteed to the people - should they accept the less than desirable means being implemented - have ever come to pass.

The end results have merely gotten worse and worse over time. And the politicians, bureaucrats, despots, vicious dictators and maniacs have all been doing everything they can to increase the pressure each and every year in an attempt to keep the populations of the planet so pre-occupied that they don't have the time to completely analyze the evolving social disorder. They have also been, for many decades, tainting water and food supplies across the planet in a bid to create lethargy and memory loss.

In California, shortly after Arnold Schwarzenegger became governor, the government began again, in 2004, to fluoridate the water supply. Funny thing is, the only geographical location in the bay area that did not get fluoridated water was the city of Half Moon Bay. The reason claimed by the government was that the city just could not afford the additive. Except that Half Moon Bay is one of the riches cities in California.

The truth is that they did not want it, and fought to prevent it being added to the water supply. Moreover, it is possible that wealthy manipulators were a part of the decision to push for fluoridation and were prepared ahead of time.

Just so everybody understands: sodium fluoride is a poison, there is no exception, and it is quie dangerous. It was used in Nazi Germany during the Holocaust, and was added to the water supply for one reason only; because it produced the desired effect on the prisoners in the camps where it made them lethargic and nearly incapable of critical thinking and thus prevented any sustained aggression that may have allowed them to fight back with enough determination to overpower their captors.

It appears that Obama will not help the people in Libya. He knows damned well that this freedom that is taking root across the planet's oppressed and volatile regions is a clear and present threat to everything he believes in, or is a part of fomenting. It will ensure that the deceptive and unruly elitists of the world will soon have no ability to live in decadence as they do everything they can to convince the people that poverty is a precious commodity that they just can't do without.

Barack Obama is nothing but a pig in a prom dress...Period! And he is a lying buffoon who would just as soon bury this nation in a deep dark hole and shovel feces over it.

President Barack Obama has decided, of his own accord, that the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law prohibiting same sex marriages, is unconstitutional. Furthermore, he has drawn even more controversy into an already conflagrating issue by announcing that the law will no longer be defended by his administration, and the US Attorney General.

Speaker John Boehner, Friday, said the House will likely go to court to defend the law. He also showed that he realizes the act of declaring the law unconstitutional is not a decision that the president alone is capable of declaring, nor should he be allowed to.

While it is true that Obama has taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, there are still parameters of due process described in the Constitution which must be adhered to if one is to use their official position to contest the law.

Obama's actions show him to be anything but a protector of the United States Constitution he promised he would uphold. But instead appears to be more of an opportunist whom views the constitution as an obstacle he must suppress or divert if he's to have any chance of being elected to a second term.

His exists as both a personal endeavor, and a political ploy to garner as much support from homosexuals as he can by sympathizing with them, and sensationalizing alleged acts of intolerance and discrimination against them.

First of all, what has to be understood is that in reality, no individual or group can actually be discriminated against for being homosexual, since the act of sexual relations is a freedom of choice issue and therefore entirely manageable as a preference if and when a person decides they prefer engaging in sex with persons of the same gender. The fact that this is also a deviance adds a dual descriptor to the mix whereby homosexuals are reasonably predisposed to find the majority of any society at odds with their behaviors.

One will also note that deviant behaviors in American society have become much more flamboyant as time has moved forward, and the social order digressed in tandem with the contrived tolerance of various perversions.

To exfoliate the true implications one must understand that it would never become an issue if somebody claimed they were discriminated against for being a heterosexual, since this also is not possible. This is simply due to the fact that regardless of what choice one makes as to whom they will have sex with, every human being on this planet is born a heterosexual; as evidenced by the fact that there are two genders, and the physical attributes of humans determine that they are expected to engage in sexual intercourse with the opposite sex.

This proves that the discrimination would not be against the person for exhibiting evidence of their heterosexuality or homosexuality, but as the result of some other expression which would then likely be determined to be a choice the person is capable of controlling. Unfortunately, homosexuality is not a Universal right, nor an inalienable right under the US Constitution.

Simply being unwilling to make the tough decision to either engage in natural sex with the opposite gender, or else abstain, does not create a valid cause of action when determining one has been discriminated against.

What is actually occurring is that a majority of the population is simply reluctant to support, condone or encourage the choice to be homosexual. However, this lack of support is what is so often attacked by homosexuals who then demand that they are the ones being attacked, and that it is due to a discrimination being perpetrated against them.

The sad truth is that if a person is such that their behaviors make others reasonably uncomfortable, and therefore expected to avoid them or decry their behaviors, then deciding not to hire the person is simply a logical thing to do. For the most part, in protection of one's investment, but also in an attempt to preserve the society that they live in by not encouraging the aberrant behavior.

When one honorably analyzes the basic premise of "gay rights" what is glaringly obvious is that they are actually a demand that society not just tolerate the behavior, but expressly support and condone it.

Moreover, as all good Constitutional Lawyers know, the United States Constitution expressly prohibits Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion, of which one could easily codify the act of practicing homosexuality to be; a religiously practiced belief structure, that is.

The indisputable fact is that homosexuality is not a natural function for any living thing, and for humans it is such that it can only exist as a practiced adherence to a doctrine, since no person is a homosexual without they choose to act as one. Again it must be understood that all humans are born heterosexuals; and thus by nature, homosexuality exists in deed alone.

Of interest in this evolving matter, is the fact that Barack Obama was implicated, rather legitimately, back in 2008 in a video that aired on Youtube, where a man named Larry Sinclair stated that he engaged in sex with Obama in a limousine outside a prominent Chicago club in 1999, and then again at his hotel room in Gurney, Illinois two days later. This was during the time that Obama was a senator for the state of Illinois. (Youtube.com)

Furthermore, three men - Donald Young, Nate Spencer and Larry Bland - from Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United church of Christ, that Obama attended for over 20 years, were found dead, two of them murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads, the other of Sepsis from complications related to HIV. One of the men, Young, was a choir master for the church. All three were openly homosexual. (firetown.com)

All three died inside of a 40 day period beginning in November of 2007. Furthermore, a private investigator connected to the Chicago Police Department told The Globe that "Donald Young was killed because he knew something about Obama."

Sinclair, in an affidavit to Chicago Police, said that Young told him "he and Obama had been intimate with each other". Sinclair also reported receiving phone calls from two of the three murder victims shortly before the murders, in which they explained that they were intending to cooperate with the investigation into Sinclair's allegations.

The Wayne Madsen Report (WMR) exposes both Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama as lifetime members of a gay bath house called "Man's Country" which for over thirty years has catered to older white men, and is known as one of uptown Chicago's "grand old bath houses". (beforeitsnews.com)

WMR has learned recently that Obama and Emanuel possess "Man's Country" issued club identification cards, which are required for entry. The club's website advertises steam rooms, "fantasy rooms", bedrooms, male strippers, adult movies, and lockers.

Obama allegedly began frequenting the club in the mid 1990's as a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and through his election as a Senator of Illinois in 1996. Emanuel reportedly joined after he left the Clinton White House, entering the investment firm of Wasserstein Perella in Chicago where he held his membership during his 2002 campaign for the US District House seat vacated after Rod Blagojevich moved on to the governorship.

It appears that Obama is also connected to NAMBLA (the North American Man Boy Love Association of pedophiles). He appointed Kevin Jennings, a strong supporter of the organization, as Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools Czar. Jennings say's that one of the people who inspired him most was Harry Hay, who gave key note speeches and held panel discussions at several NAMBLA conferences. (politicalvalvecraft.com)

A scathing article further explaining these allegations, and detailing a salty list of Obama's dealings and criminal friends can be found here.

"People will know you by the company you keep" my grandmother told me

Barack Hussein Obama.

Given that Obama has been implicated in this way, there is significant reason to believe that there is almost no possibility that he could be entirely impartial toward any portion of the Defense Of Marriage Act.

References:

http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=68920

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/09/18/obama-linked-to-nambla-north-american-man-boy-lust-association-obama-jennings-hay-nambla/

http://www.firetown.com/blog/2011/01/08/three-members-of-obama%E2%80%99s-church-killed/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MceFVpJ-Gyc

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/244/451/Obama_Emanuel_Same_Gay_Bath_House_Traced_In_Chicago.SPECIAL_REPORT.html.

President Barack Obama, in a deft display of intuitive ingenuity, announced today that it is possible to slice bread and - hold on to your hats folks - actually suggested using these slices to construct all manner of edible erections that can be held between the fingers and gobbled with delight. Ah, the audacity of hope ensured. What won't he think of next?

In an article appearing in the Associated Press, Obama hail's the efforts of Intel Corp. who has committed to a $200 million program designed to promote math and science education - touting it as an example of 'how corporate America can make money at the same time it builds the country.' (AP, Erica Werner, "Obama promotes jobs by way of education" 19 FEB 2011)

While one may initially find it fitting to kneel appreciatively in wide-eyed praise of this veritable dangling carrot, the flaccid truth is that the idea is not a new one, nor is it even an avoidable one according to the United States Constitution. (ok, I'm done with the salaciously suggestive, sarcastic super bowl cynicism).

First of all, this smacks of child brainwashing and denial of opportunities, much like the largely defunct "School to Work" programs that the Bush administration attempted to woo school districts with.

This was a program that offered grants to schools, and their boards of supervisors, that agreed to seduce students with promises of guaranteed employment in specific lines of work, offering various incentives and correlating narrow-minded courses of instruction that were tailored to the local business sectors. The curriculum was typically laid-out by local corporations which would provide a list of capabilities they deemed were necessary to operate within the company.

The implications here are alarming, and I will briefly offer a couple of scenarios.

One: Johnny is being offered only two classes this year. Metal shop and first aid. because the only open jobs are in local manufacturing plants.

Two: "Good morning girls, today we are going to learn about fellatio, because the local government has decided it is time we allow legal brothels to operate in our county."

Obama is quoted as saying "Companies like Intel are proving that we can compete." A rather dubious statement since nobody ever insinuated, or likely even believes, that this nation cannot.

He then pontificates the utter obvious like it is an epiphany he just discovered, stating "Instead of just being a nation that buy's what's made overseas, we can make things in America and sell them around that globe."

However, what is most advantageous to the American public is selling the things manufactured in the U.S. right here in America. This not only reduces waste and conserves resources, but it cuts down on the Carbon Footprint of distribution and delivery that Obama claims to be attempting to reduce with Cap and Trade.

Obama then furthers his kindergarten lesson (that a kindergartner could expound upon) saying "Winning this competition depends on the ingenuity and creativity of our private sector. But it's also going to depend on what we do as a nation to make America the best place on Earth to do business (yes AP the word "Earth" needs to be capitalized, by the way).

First of all, while this is a gregarious sentiment of some sorts, the fact is that America is not some manufacturing plant or fish market, it is the place that Americans call home. It is the place where Americans live and breath, hope, help sing and play. It is the reflection of our dreams, and the refraction of our means.

America has always been, and will always be, a great place to do business. However, this is not, nor will it ever be, America's primary function. Neither is business the primary function of any nation. Business is merely a complimentary cohesion that nets a force of social interaction capable of sustaining the daily lives and livelihoods of the nations of the world.

Attempting to push these many separate social sections into one confusing pile of profit and paternalism is never going to satisfy the requirements placed upon humanity by the roles commanded under Universal functions.

It truly is time that Obama refrain from with this incessant pandering to those who daily whimper and whine that the New World Order is losing steam simply due to a lack of self-promotion. It is time to give up the ghost and let the reality of 'it will never happen' sink in. The truth is; the New World Order that so many power-brokers are envisioning, is not actually possible. Suffice it to say, that anyone whom possesses the ability to rule the world, is inexplicably also gifted with the wisdom to never even attempt it. But I digress.

The article goes on to say that Obama's 'West Cost swing' was also attended by big names in California's Silicon Valley, such as Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg (the young and old of the government/corporate, civil spy ring) who are both sure to bow graciously before his lordship, kissing the budget proposal band on Obama's middle finger; drooling over its diamond studded spending increases in education, research and development, and high-speed internet. But taking great care not to lacerate their lying lips on the razor sharp nick in the reticular rock's beveled edge ... cuts in 'other areas'

These cuts in 'other areas' so conveniently unmentioned (and rightly so) are of services for the poor and underprivileged, such as college grants, programs to aid working poor, and assistance to help the needy heat their homes.

Coming from a politician who hail's from the sub-zero shadows of Chi Town, the towering Mobster Mecca of the Midwest, these cuts appear surprisingly 'uneven handed'. This attempt to show bipartisanship, unfortunately, lends little credence to his propose goal of job creation, and exists in complete disregard for the fact that the majority of this nation's corporate-level businesses are currently flying high on the magic carpet they literally ripped out from under the majority of this nation's citizenry during the '07 to '09 economic meltdown that was bailed out by American tax dollars.

Furthermore, the needs of the people will always be met, regardless of what Obama or any other deranged and delusional dilettante of destabilization demand's is a fiscal demonstration of decency.

These cuts will merely appease the Republicans (aka fake conservatives) with a turbid trail of tepid fiscal responsibility that will lead to more budget shortfalls in many states where the feds will propose rescue efforts to save them from bankruptcy. Of course, the slush funds that will be set up in tandem with the corporations who help to create this bait and switch, will then be used to purchase control over entire geographical swaths of the United States, to be manipulated as they see fit.

Even more disconcerting is the fact that the alleged conservatives are demanding deeper cuts in what they call "entitlements", such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. When, remarkable, these are not actually entitlements at all, they are part of a program that was created and implemented more than a half century ago, and which those who claim benefits under these programs, for the most part, are people who paid into the program for several decades.

If these politicians truly desire to speak of cuts to entitlements, then they must first be required to cut the fat from their own pensions, and return all budget surpluses to the peoples' trusts rather than routinely pad their retirement accounts with them nearly every year. These politicians, and their criminal cohorts in corporate business and finance have been incessantly bailed-out of trouble by the tax payers so many times, they all deserve a pay-cut and loss of their pensions. Furthermore, far too many of them need to see the inside of a jail cell so that they can reflect on their utterly depraved insubordination and insolence perpetrated at the expense of an entire nation.

If these sycophants truly want to talk "entitlement reform", then how about talking about the fact that the people are entitled to representation by their government, absent the bias for any profitable endeavors?

How about the fact that the people are entitled to a legislative process that is transparent and compliant with the United States Constitution?

How about the fact that the people of this nation are entitled to an accountable government that is required to coin the money, rather than outsource this nation's economic foundation at the behest of pontificating parliamentary pragmatists who demand that the prosperous American system be kept in check by a satellite agency which can spread the nation's wealth across the globe at will, and with utter treasonous impunity, to prevent the downfall of the world's oppressive monarchial controls?

How about the fact that the entire world is entitled to fulfillment of promises made to so many countries by the United States Government and its national security pawns, in the name of the American people who, incidentally, were never privy to the low down, back stabbing, false flag flying, fire-sale freak show that occurred during the average black hand, back room, butter ball feast of felicitous flesh that organizations such as the Bilderberg Group, Common Purpose, the Counsel on Foreign Relations, and so many others attended, never intending to do anything but wrest every last molecule of dignity and autonomy from their peoples?

Back before the advent of what can only be termed as "Rockefellerism" - which was essentially the act of building corporations on the backs of the American people, and paying government to crack the whip of market manipulation; allowing them to operate above the laws and the people who respectively both constrain and support them - this nation's business sectors were regulated by what were called 'Charter Agreements'

These were contracts with the people, if you will. And any corporation that desired to operate in the United States was first required to submit an application that detailed the intentions of that corporation. If for any reason it was determined that the corporation's projected status would operate outside of the "good of the people" then the application was denied.

Furthermore, if the corporation was found to be eligible, the Charter Agreement could only be valid for either 5 or 10 years, or until completion of a proposed project.

However, John D. Rockefeller considered this type of agreement to be inhospitable to his primary goals (everything from xenophobia and population control to plutocracy and authoritarianism). Therefore, he petitioned government to allow him to operate above this agreement by, essentially, offering them a "piece of the action". if you will.

Considering the evolving decline of American meritocracy that ensued, and the complicit actions of the Federal Reserve and its creators, this ushered in an era that combined Church and State, while simultaneously dissolving "we the people" by dividing citizen and government.

Now, as the hood is burning away from the collective head of the people, politicians and corporations are beginning to back-peddle, albeit with sword and shield in hand, and attempting to still rise above the turning tide on a sunken vessel.

Obama's current protagonist platitudes are nothing more than doublespeak that expects the public to decide for themselves how to come to terms with a complex web of government malfeasance in concert with corporate misfeasance designed to further fleece and fracture the American people.

Just how does Obama intend to expect any form of compliance from entities that obviously have their pockets open to the legislators in this country? How does he explain the Supreme Court's decision that "money equals speech", or that the term "navigable waterways" is such that it can be redefined to allow corporations to dump toxic waste into rivers, streams, lakes, estuaries and oceans with utter impunity?

Where is this man's compunction? Does he truly expect this nation's sovereign citizens to just hand over the keys to their front door because he say's that the corporate sycophants have suddenly offered to give back to the people some small pittance of what has been stolen from them for over a century?

I initially did everything I could to find the good in President Obama's latest kibble of crumbs offered to this nation's burgeoning rolls of good-natured and far-too-trusting citizens, and it just devoured my mind yet again in the gaping jaws of a bloated and morality masticating corporate/government beast of bombastic bureaucracies.

Regardless of claims to the contrary, any company that ever intends to operate in the United States must first and foremost be held accountable to the American people. The Constitution is explicit in its many references to the separation of business and government. It expressly prohibits holding any office of public trust while also holding any position of profit.

To digress for a moment, this type of reasoning also extended to the mechanism of impeachment in that it displayed the founding fathers' understanding that any person who was found impeachable under any article of the Constitution (ahem, Mr. Kenya), was thereby prohibited from holding any "office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: [and] the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to the Law." (Article 1, Section 3 Clause 7; U.S. Constitution).

No corporation ever shall be operational in this nation but that it is supported by the people who sustain it, both in proletariat production and consumer confidence. And it can never be allowed to exist but at the pleasure of the people.

Government has both far overreached its authority and fully undervalued its people for much too long in this country. And the market manipulation that it has engaged in has enabled corporations to, not only profit and proliferate, but fraternize and fulminate a growing populous with mechanisms of social distortion that promises everything from puissant positions of anonymous control, to plagiarized partnerships and associative roles; balkanizing the entire society with distorted reveries of decadent denial, parsing them with bloated and vacuous accounts that are said to exist absent any accountability.

This is yet another false frigate set adrift in this sea of menagerie, mined and maligned with the fallacious fragrance of explosive talk. When will this government bend to save itself?

The clock is ticking, oh mendacious morbidity.

Reference:

Werner, Erica; AP, 19 FEB 2011. "Obama promotes jobs by way of education"

@ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110219/ap_on_re_us/us_obama

Barack Hussein Obama, acting president of the United States, actually had the gall to state in his Union Address that "we can't win the future with a government of the past." So, just what does Obama think "can" be accomplished without his aid?

Does Obama somehow believe that America's meteoric rise on the global stage was due to his second coming? Does he believe all of the ridiculous sentiment that considers him the "anointed one", or some kind of "messiah" that strolls on water?

Truly, Obama has got to be one of the most self-centered, egomaniacal and inept presidents to have ever inhabited the oval office in these United States.

It is most certainly the "government of the past", both in size and function, which will steer this nation back on course.

While it is certainly true that there are those of honorable mention, such as the veteran legislator from Texas, Dr. Ron Paul, who consistently proves his tenacious dedication to constitutional values, it has been the many deceptive mechanisms of a "modern" government bent on circumventing the constitution that has allowed so many egregious business engagements to proliferate within the nation's various markets.

This government was charged with regulating, according to strictly enumerated powers outlined in the constitution, industry in this country, and do so in compliance with the United States Constitution; and thereby protect the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for each and every individual in this nation regardless of race, religion, gender, class, political affiliation, social status, sexual preference, or affinity for the truth.

However, the majority of government has not engaged this responsibility to any honorable degree for over a century, and it is destroying this nation.

This nation was created to supply the American Dream of Freedom only, not opulence and/or profiteering. The Charter Agreements that were required for anyone, or any company/companies, whom desired to "incorporate" (requiring that they must prove the project or incorporation is for the "good of the people" and last only 5 or 10 yrs, or till completion of the project) is an example of responsible business in a Constitutional Republic of "we the people" which has not been seen since the John D. Rockefeller era.

If this nation were not so infiltrated by treasonous, and indefensibly idealistic, politicians whom do not in any way support or defend its constitution - as their oath demands - then corporate taxes (a growing part of Fascist engagement of Washington, and a clear instigator of corrupt alliances in the "lobbying" shell-game) would not even exist, and business taxes would actually increase the number of jobs in the private sector.

Barack Obama denies this nation and its auspicious roots ad nearly every turn, and it cannot be ignored that his near-sightedness is much less a myopic condition, than a beady eyed ruse.

I have not had the opportunity to see his entire "audacious" rant to the American people. However, it appears he, once again, has denigrated this nation and its many tenacious and resilient citizens with complete aplomb...and utter abandon.

First lady, Michelle Obama's much repudiated statement during the 2007-08 election campaign, where she blurted out that she was for the first time finally proud of this country, appears to have been a sentiment that both she and husband Barack share, regardless of their many attempts to prove otherwise.

An in-depth article concerning highlights of his State of the Union address will be published in the coming days on factbat.com and other sites.