factbat.com

By: Dane Wilson

In an article on Investors.com called “Right Wing Is Using Race To Smear Obama”, written by Eugene Robinson, the author claims that Andrew Breitbart, the blogger who first broke the video of Shirley Sherrod addressing a crowd of NAACP members on racial issues, is nothing but a “smarmy provocateur who often speaks at Tea Party rallies”.

Once again the left finds a way to attack the Tea Party, insinuating, or outright claiming, that they are a bunch of racists, while ignoring that they themselves are the ones who are demonstrably plying the card of race, accusing anyone it doesn’t agree with, with acts of racism, all from behind a blanket of racial bias and separatist sentiment.

Robinson, himself a smarmy provocateur who appears to do little else than write ignorance and lies for somebody at Investors Business Daily, believes that there was absolutely no reason whatsoever for Breitbart to have posted the video of Sherrod on the internet, other than that he is an intemperate and deceptive person who was attempting to fool people into believing that there is racism in the NAACP. Robinson also believes it is just fine for Justice Sonia Sotomayor to have lauded her “wise Latina” heritage as a credible association for which to influence her decisions on the bench.

As far as the official bigotry is concerned however, all one needs to do is watch the entire video to see that there is most definitely racism alive and burgeoning within the NAACP. The people in the audience who were listening to Sherrod’s spiel were clearly showing their approval of her explanation of racial discrimination she showed toward a white couple.

What is remarkable is that Sherrod even stated that she “took him (the white man) to one of his own kind” as if this was some acceptable form of behavior. And the audience is heard clearly agreeing with this decision.

Furthermore, merely the name of the NAACP exudes a racial bias. It does not say the National Association for the Advancement of People. It only say’s “Colored People.” Regardless of who may have ever sought only the advancement of “White People”, it was audacious and bigoted in every way, and was never tolerated by a majority of white people. However, the majority of black people obviously do not share a like sentiment.

Just how do the members of the NAACP think this type of bigotry and racial bias looks to those who are not in any way racist, nor have ever been biased toward or against any race of peoples? Just how is it expected to affect those of us who live daily in close proximity to excessive racial bias and hatred displayed by blacks and Latinos against whites. Especially to those whites who know the true history of this nation?

The fact is that it was never “all”, or even a majority of whites who were racist against blacks, and in fact the majority of white people have always been against segregation and slavery. It was whites who fought other white people in this nation -- fought and died -- to emancipate blacks.

Actually, it was the Conservative Right which most demonstrably fought to emancipate black people in America.

What is astonishing is that Robinson goes on to make bombastic claims -- like most Democrats do -- about how those who are exposing the racist rants and violent actions of the New Black Panther Party are just race baiters.

He claims “These allegations of anti-white racism are being deliberately hyped and exaggerated because they are designed to make whites fearful. It won’t work with most people, of course” (damned right I say) “but it works with some -- enough, perhaps, to help erode Obama’s political standing and damage his party’s prospects at the polls.”

No, Robinson, Obama and his administration -- albeit with the help of morons like you -- are doing that all on their own.

Robinson goes on to claim “Before Sherrod, the cause celebre of the ‘You Must Fear Obama’ campaign involved something called the New Black Panther Party. Never heard of it? That’s because it’s a tiny group that exists mainly in the fevered imaginations of its few members…also in the alternate reality of Fox News: One of the networks hosts has devoted more than three hours of air time in recent weeks to the grave threat posed by the NBPP.”

However, the NBPP is becoming more well known as they spew racial hatred and are allowed to address large crowds at the NAACP. In fact there have been various interviews with prominent members of the NBPP who claim that “the only way to get rid of police brutality is to get rid of the police” and that it is time to start “killing cracker babies”, among other ignorant statements.

Robinsons say’s “the way to deal with bullies is to confront them, not run away.”

Hopefully Robinson remembers he said that when it comes to bear that the white people in this nation are not getting scared because of the racial hatred being perpetrated and parroted by the Left in this nation, but instead are getting pissed off.

With the way a majority of blacks in this nation appear to behave concerning the issue of racism, it becomes quite apparent that if the tables had been turned, and it had been whites who were being enslaved and abused, then at this point in time every household in America would consist of a black family with white servants.

What is remarkable is the fact that the Left, who’s members constantly claim to be against racism and racial discrimination, are the ones who create the most racial and social disparities in this nation.

Furthermore, it has been Obama and his administration whom have both consistently stirred up racial bias in this nation, and irresponsibly caused racial upheaval in among the citizenry. He claimed that those who disagreed with his 2008 campaign platform were just racists. He has incessantly accused those who are against his policies of the last year and a half, as racist.

Obama even wrote an extremely racist book called “Dreams of My Father” where he speaks of his constant dichotomy of racial bias even though he had a white mother. He exposes his class hatred and racial bias when speaking of “watching stupid rich white folks” picking up dog feces and how amusing he found it to be.

Not to mention the fact that Obama is little more than an egocentrically motivated, megalomaniacal ideologue who does not exude any actual sentiment toward humanity or basic human compunction. He is nothing but an elitist who will attempt to force his will upon this nation regardless of the obvious effects because he is not motivated by results or intuition based on compassion. He is only interested in accomplishing a set number of chosen goals that are compliant with his, and his Politbureau’s, authoritarian expectations as determined by the projected success of national hypnosis under the veiled utopia they are promising…but will never deliver.

Even more excoriating however, concerning the video of Sheri Sherrod, is the fact that at one point she is seen opining about how the government never fires anyone. She is seen bragging about “even in this economic recession, have anyone ever seen a federal employee lose their job?…uh huh, that’s all I've got say.” Essentially going on to explain that it is best to work for the government if one wants job security.

Sherrod also goes on to openly extol her belief that it is all about the “have’s and the have not’s” as if this is the deciding factor driving her behaviors. So just what will she do when she is faced with a person she believes to be too “rich looking” to help? What is the difference between looking too black, too white, too Latino or too rich? They are all discriminatory allegations based on a bias either for or against a person based on the perception that they belong to a particular group one believes to be “worthy” or “unworthy” regardless of their specific disposition. It exposes her belief that if one appears to be rich then they are the enemy. Rather than exhibiting a case by case variable sentiment that proves she is capable of determining eligibility based solely on need.

This irascible sentiment shown by Sherrod further paints her as even more of a despicable person who is in no way worthy of the American citizenship she now enjoys.

Hers, and many others’ obsequiousness to the government, often corroborated within the ranks of the NAACP and other Leftist national organizations, prove that these people are completely at odds with the Tea Party movement, not because the Tea Party is racist, but simply because their message of “limited government, constitutional values, balanced budget and liberated markets” will put them out of work as worshipful sycophants of their Statist masters, and instead require that they find a real job.

Barack Obama has now proven himself to be a contemptible buffoon, as he intemperately seeks some “ass to kick” as a means of expressing his frustration with the British Petroleum oil catastrophe. He sounds like an alcoholic father, slurring profanity as he stumbles through the door, bent on releasing his anxiety on the subordinate captives he is sure are to blame for his failures and angst.

While it may be true that profanity has its place in various areas of daily communication among a society such as America, its engagement will always prove to be an entirely irascible and ignorant medium with which to convey the will of authority.

What stands as stark contrast to the assertive speech of a strong willed and determined leader, are the words of Barack Obama, employing profanity as a means of excusing all form of executive responsibility regarding response to the Gulf Oil Spill, and further exposed an utter lack of both direction and insight in the midst of crisis.

In more than just this instance, Obama’s audacious behaviors have abused the position of President of the United States to a degree never before witnessed in American history. This latest display of a lack of decorum at the helm of the world’s most powerful office proves he has absolutely no business steering the course of this nation.

For what reason, aside from incompetence, would any leader of the executive branch of the government find need to degrade the position in such a manner?

What is astonishing is that most of his energies during the continuing crisis in the Gulf, have been focused on parties and rhetorical speeches. Even worse, in a recent speech to high school students -- where incidentally he opined longingly for those days when he used to “party too much” -- Obama exclaimed that “there are no excuses.”

However, he has done little more than make excuses for why he has done almost nothing to address the BP spill.

The office of the presidency not only demands a great strength of character, it also affords one the authority to command assistance and insight from a plethora of other viable sources within the various branches of government.

With so many resources at Obama’s disposal, it is entirely ridiculous to excuse him for this deplorable and disloyal public outburst. Especially when it comes on the heels of obvious illegal politicking and shady quid pro quo deals that are nearly a mirror image of his largely denied involvement with the criminal organization ACORN.

One must certainly begin to wonder why the Obama administration is so content to excuse its own contribution to the crisis in the Gulf, while simultaneously chiding BP for not doing enough.

This administration neglected, or refused, to employ even those previously sanctioned strategies which were part of a pre-approved response to just this sort of catastrophe; the burning of the oil, which was one strategy the would have guaranteed that toxic sludge did not make land-fall.

Furthermore, far too much energy was spent attacking BP, or determining just what the company’s liability was in the matter. Which likely caused undue stress upon those attempting to solve the crisis, and generated an environment where secrecy and diversion would become paramount ventures.

Most, if not all, of the efforts should initially have been focused directly on stemming the flow of crude escaping from the well.

However, since the Obama administration -- famous for claiming “never let a good crisis go to waste” -- was hell-bent on attempting to turn the spill into a fiasco for political gain, their efforts appear more geared to those of a Roosevelt administration, proposing a "new deal" era where the future is hinged only on the failures of the past, and therefore those proposing the cure are indemnified by excuses that it was not their doing which caused the crisis, so whatever is done to fix it cannot be expected to produce anything more than bloated bureaucracies with which to demonize any further private efforts...not sanctioned by them.

Now this administration, along with its Marxist leader, is attempting to distance itself from the protracted environmental disaster it has helped to exacerbate, by claiming that none of them were made aware as to the actual nature of the threat.

The people of Louisiana, weeks after the crude has soiled their beaches and estuaries, are still waiting for Obama to approve requests to build off shore dunes that would stop or re-direct it. Over 50 days after the initial incident booms needed for cleanup have still not been sent to the areas that need them. BP’s use of the pre-approved dispersants needed to reduce the oil’s impact has been prohibited.

Now the oil is expected to affect the beaches of Florida and potions of the east coast around the Pan Handle.

Given this administrations lack of foresight or engagement of the situation, who could expect anything more from Obama but to sound off with yet another bombastic and mendacious statement of self-efficacy.

What is most inculpating of all however, is the fact that Obama, when stating “I need to know who’s ass to kick”, proves that the most debilitating portion of the crisis now evolving in the Gulf, is the person who had the power to both set the most people in motion to solve it, and influence the most people in the nation as to how the accident should be viewed.

It appears that Obama did his very least to provide the people necessary to mitigate the effects of the disaster, and his very most to exacerbate the demonizing of it.

Rand Paul, son of the U.S. Congresses premier libertarian and patriot Ron Paul, has easily won the Republican nomination for Senator of Kentucky.

He was victorious in an atmosphere that many likely felt daunting at best. Paul was, for most of the race, considered “the long shot”. However, there are many in this nation who would easily disagree with such a label, and they would be correct for many reasons.

It appears that not only are the establishment politicians preposterously pragmatic, ignorantly indifferent, repugnantly arrogant, and constitutionally illiterate, they are extremely out of step with the American people.

For anyone in the Republican party to have believed that a Dick Cheney endorsement of Ray Grayson would garner the ex-Secretary of State any support by more than a select few diplomatically nascent voters and dusty relics, is astonishing. Any connection to Cheney will likely be nothing short of the kiss of death for most any politician, since the awakening that has gripped the majority of this nation’s voters.

This is just one more example that the government in this nation is astonishingly inept.

Much is being made of the Tea Party movement and its influence during this and other upsets across the nation. And as much as it is true that the Tea Partiers are an extremely formidable force for a myriad reasons, the fact is that the Obama administration’s lockstep with the Bush administration, and increase of national instability accordingly, has made many enemies of the voters for both parties, and is going to cost them dearly this midterm.

Furthermore, the main stream media’s obsequious pandering to government interests, global warming proponents, New World Order oligarchs, racist sensationalists, and bombastic liars, have proven the majority of the nation’s bureaucracy to be entirely unaccountable, ineffective and disloyal to the American public.

It is astonishing that so many politicians believe that people who march in the streets are powerful, and are to be supported in an effort to gain votes, or create for them some image of a candidate of the people. However, one must be discerning enough to choose the support of those who are marching in the streets for a patriotic reason, with the intention of bringing to attention the will of the people and the power of the United Sates Constitution. And be careful to avoid aligning one’s self with the contrary groups who are merely expecting to force changes in the nation by demanding that their own personal agendas be complied with, and attempting to look sympathetic to the people without regard to the implications of legality or constitutional ethics.

Voters are wise enough to realize that Rand Paul will bring to the office the same staunch adherence to the Constitution that his father has exhibited for decades in the United States Congress. One does not need to question the intentions of the man, nor worry that he is hiding some personal agenda.

Every public official in this nation is required to take an oath to protect, uphold and defend the constitution of this nation, for a very specific and critical reason. Because human beings are fallible, and at various times can find themselves unable to disseminate just what is the best course of action.

Fortunately, this nation’s founding fathers were wise enough to create a template for guiding one’s daily course as an American citizen. The many inalienable rights that are afforded these citizens are those which present as negative rights for the government. This means that all politicians only need follow the tenets of this document in order to properly, and equitably, serve the greater good of the people, and in so doing, the nation. 

These negative rights are the set of rules that stipulate just what the government is NOT allowed to do, and all other allowances (ie, rights) are reserved to the various states, and those citizens who call them home. 

The United States’ Constitutional Republic and its concordant Government are not easy entities to screw up, and what is absolutely deplorable is the way in which those who now populate its rotting corpse have mismanaged and degraded it to a populist realm ruled by miscreant sophists who expect to wield their responsibilities and accountabilities as weapons of mass manipulation, playing them off of the people like personal attributes, and driving them into the collective soil of society as spires of power and lordship, taking root in the fertile foundation of this nation like some choking weed born of ivy league slave drivers.

Witnessing the smug looks and lurking eyes of the average politician are like watching a storybook villain assume the role of hero in some quasi cloak and dagger realm of morbidly proletarian plagiarism. They stand there in front of the cameras, flaccid and laughably stoic, like a grinning python, preposterously deceptive and expertly inept.

Schwarzenegger, Pelosi, Boxer, Clinton, Obama, Rice, Cheney and so many others portray an incredulous air of feigned legitimacy as they lawyer-up on the public and refuse to let even one molecule of truth squeak out from their fanged and flatulent anuses…bowing to the authoritarian and criminal status quo with sycophant eyes, drooling at the very thought of torturing the masses as they bilk the nation for everything they can possibly get their greedy hands on.

This country will not suffer such ilk for much longer, and the factbat website will be entering the fray of this election season with as much precision as possible.

It’s a great time to be a true American. My hat is off to Rand Paul and his supporters who “made it happen” in Kentucky.

In the Miami Herald today they have given their opinion on Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s position concerning relations with Iran and the assertions of Hillary Clinton which she alleges reflects the majority of international sentiment.

The Herald claims that “even before Clinton could appeal for Silva to support sanctions against Iran for breaking the rules of nuclear-proliferation, the Brazilian President offered “this airy dismissal: ‘It is not prudent to push Iran against a wall’”

To which the Herald asks “what wall?” And then claims that “The United States and the world community have made a years-long effort to break down the barriers and engage Iran diplomatically about its nuclear program.” Claiming Iran’s answer was “Talk, talk, defy, defy.”

However, neither the Bush administration nor the Obama administration has done anything but endeavor to dictate to Iran on various policies and blindly support Israel in almost any action they engage regardless of how monstrous it may be, or appear to their neighbors.

The United States political and financial support of Israel cannot in any way be furthering relations with many of the Middle Eastern countries in that region, which is evidenced by the fact that this nation is now embroiled in various military conflicts in the region, and they are escalating with little sign of abating in the next decade.

Unfortunately, President Barack Obama has almost nothing to bring to the bargaining table and instead is merely a puppet of an AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) bureaucratic machine which typically displays utter disdain toward any entity which even so much as questions their motives. Their coalitions and counterparts routinely accuse skeptics of being bigots, simply for repudiating their many brutalities and racially biased actions.

The international community which the Herald is speaking of has seen fit to ignore Israel’s use of phosphor and mass casualty weapons such as the DIME (Dense Inert Metal Explosive) ordinance which have both been condemned by international human rights organizations, and are being investigated by the U.N. Human Rights Council for their long term biological and carcinogenic effects on entire civilian populations.

Israel is even allowed to bulldoze and murder American activists, such as Rachel Corrie, with impunity, and kill Palestinian protestors -- who are merely throwing small stones -- with tear gas weapons and rubber bullets that are used in a lethal fashion, which is also prohibited by international law when engaging peaceful protestors.

Iran has many times in history felt the sting of CIA covert operations and coups which have destabilized their society and overthrown their duly appointed leaders. However, many of America’s elected officials act as if they take breakfast with Ahmadinejad every morning.

The Untied States memorializes nearly every qualm Israel has, or has ever had, while at the same time ignoring even the most blatant of atrocities against much of the rest of the Middle East. And this incessant posturing by American politicians will only weaken relations with a growing number of countries, and further steel Iran’s resolve to maintain inexplicably autonomous.

The Herald goes on to say that “It (presumably Iran) continued to play for time, engaging ‘negotiations’ even though its secret work to develop nuclear capability constituted an undeniable violation of U.N. rules.” Stating further that “George W. Bush…offered Iran economic and diplomatic incentives (including talks with the United States) in exchange for playing by the international rules of nuclear development.”

However, how can U.S. policymakers expect a country such as Iran to play by rules the United States, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, the UK, France, China, India, North Korea and South Africa do not play by? Moreover, the United States shares nuclear weapons with Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Turkey. Allegedly South Africa, who signed the non-proliferation treaty in 1991, has ceased all nuclear weapons construction, but that is largely debated.

Regardless of what reasoning is proffered in justification of this double standard, it likely bears absolutely no significant relevance to Iran’s international prognosis in the mind of Ahmadinejad. Furthermore, the main contention of the U.N., C.F.R. and other intercontinental security councils appears to be that Iran will suddenly launch a nuclear strike as soon as they can get an atomic weapon built.

However, there is no proof whatsoever that Iran would do anything more than what other countries have done, and that is use them as a bargaining tool.

Furthermore, the only countries who are proven to have employed the use of nuclear weapons are the United States and Israel, and the U.S. has been using them since before Desert Storm as Bunker Busters and other medium and large sized ordinance that are routinely coated, or infused, with Depleted Uranium.

To digress…

Much evidence also shows that the CIA has employed the use of Micro Nukes in various areas of the world, including assertions by Oklahoma City police sergeant Terry Yeakey -- later murdered in 1996, but ruled a homicide -- who told close friends of seeing small, un-detonated, nuclear devices in the Murrah building on the day of the Oklahoma City Bombing, where he witnessed federal agents carting them and other explosive devices to waiting vehicles. Dr. Charles Chumley, Yeakey’s close associate in a private investigation into the matter also died the same year of the bombing (1995) in questionable circumstances when his private plane took a nose-dive into a cabbage field shortly after take-off. Investigators could find no mechanical malfunction.

When one discovers that Timothy McVeigh was still in the military just months prior to the bombing, suspecting foul played by the Feds is not much of a stretch. Furthermore, there are many people who question the official reports of that day, and the conclusion that McVeigh acted alone.

But back to Iran and the Miami Herald’s “opinion.”

The Herald also claims that Obama offered Iran an olive branch “in his inaugural speech last year. ‘We will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.”

Wow, Obama really showed some diplomacy there. Certainly was the very least he could do…uh, I mean say. Did the Obama administration ever show any action to back up this half-baked accusation? No, only more of the same quid pro quo that has time and again elicited the same responses from Iran; “Begin to hold Israel accountable for its brutality and blatant disregard for established borders in the region, and stop supporting their war machine…then we can talk.”

The Herald cites the “discovery last September of a secret nuclear enrichment plant inside a mountain near the Iranian city of Qom which underlined that government’s determination to become a nuclear power -- and its perfidy. And given this history, President Lula da Silva’s stance sounds dangerously obtuse and unworthy of a country that aspires to be considered an equal among the world’s leaders.”

So, there is no treachery on the part of Israel -- who, by the way, abstains from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty -- when it claims that it has no nukes?

In the late 80’s Israel claimed that the Negev Nuclear Research Center near Dimona was merely a textile factory. It was not until 1986, after it was exposed by former site technician Mordechai Vanunu to be an enrichment facility for manufacturing nuclear weapons, that Israel admitted it was a nuclear facility, but still stopped short of exposing their “perfidy” when claiming it was merely a “research facility.”

Israel first began secretly researching and building its nuclear weapons capabilities in the late 40’s with covert assistance from France, and has always maintained an “airy” posture of “nuclear ambiguity.” Israel, whenever questioned on the assertion that they possess between 75 and 400 nuclear warheads -- with the capability to deliver them via ICBM, aircraft and submarines -- simply states “Israel will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons to the region.” Which could mean any number of things, but is typically accepted as either; they will not produce them, or will just stop short of being the first to send them raining down on another country.

Regardless of what they are inferring, the fact is that they are hiding their nuclear activities as well as their intentions. Can they expect any more or less form others?

It appears that Iran is merely following the example set by its mendacious neighbors.

The Miami Herald believes that “diplomatic efforts to isolate Iran offer the best opportunity to end this looming crisis peacefully. A successful effort requires the international community to present a united front to oblige Iran to stand down.”

Sure, more force is going to get a peaceful reaction from them. What planet are these people living on? Inclusion in the process, and vilification of their voice and desires are what is necessary to decompressing the volatility of the “crisis.” And any proposals to the contrary belie a cowardly and inept viewpoint on the matter. Intuition would tell anyone with a 5^th grade education that ignoring a proposed threat will not make it go away. Furthermore, neither will exacerbating the threat with pressure cause it to relinquish its position. Especially if it may possess a significant amount of justifiable concerns that are not being addressed, or being overtly ignored.

The Herald even suggests coercing Brazil to act as the liaison of manipulation, and goad Iran into compliance with a dissenting compatriot image, but still voting for a new round of sanctions.

What? is this high school all over again? Or some other Confidential Informant mentality likened to some episode of SCI Miami? It appears these people have been watching way too much television, or drinking too much of their own Kool-Aide. They actually suggest whoring Bazil out to Iran and conscripting their services like some sort of double agent.

When reading the statements by President Silva, illuminating is obvious great deal of integrity -- that likely infuriates Hillary Clinton -- I doubt he would be obliged to play along.

The article actually say’s “Brazil has a seat on the current U.N. Security Council, where its vote on a proposed tightening of sanctions against Iran carries special weight because President Lula da Silva has made it clear he is no U.S. lackey. Support for sanctions by Brazil could go a long way toward persuading Iran that the game is up. Instead, the president’s words give Tehran’s mullahs solace and comfort they don’t deserve and bring the confrontation that no one wants that much closer to reality.”

It truly is astonishing how much sensationalism and doomsday edifice there is in the Miami Herald article. Does not anyone take the time to check the facts and the mountains of data which would alert them to the reality that it is prohibition and exclusionary tactics which reap the most corrupt and destructive effects.

Consider the analogy that if it were to get to the point that only one country had nuclear weapons, the chance that those weapons would be used increases by a factor concordant with the number of proposed targets. This is no reason to go MAD (mutual assured destruction) about the solution. However, it is reason to insist that the leaders of the many nations begin to truly engage the equations, and realize once and for all that pragmatism, and employing a mentality that incessantly expects to legitimize actions which follow an “ends justifies the means” schematic, will result in the entire game becoming a battle of the warheads rather than a battle of the wits.

Quit seeking answers, and begin understanding that they are only a terminal mechanism. For posterity and progress, one must realize that there is only engagement of the question.

As far as the spin-doctors are concerned, breaking news in the nation appears to be that the unemployment rate has held steady at 9.7 percent -- a rather sunny outlook indeed, which almost certainly does not truly reflect the actual figures.

But it certainly does fall in line with promoting the efforts of a failing president who doesn’t appear to be willing to raise so much as a finger to address the real issues which still harangue the nation’s markets and overall public net worth.

It’s so nice to be inundated with messages which praise the fact that the nation is still on a backward slide that has cost another 36,000 jobs this quarter, while the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, celebrity shenanigans and duplicitous political agendas are splashed across the screens and magazine covers with minute by minute accounts of obese self-indulgence and lavish perversion amid the burgeoning theatre of depravity they abide.

Children have become the media’s new trick-ponies while maturity is denigrated as some form of mental health affliction to be avoided and medicated.

The gap in wealth across the nation is increasing and bureaucratic corporate pandering is at an all time high as the Supreme Court consistently rules against the sovereign individual -- in flagrant contempt for the constitution and the rule of law -- and rewards corporations for misfeasance, mendacity and environmental assault.

The working class can certainly wave goodbye to another round of jobs next quarter as the nation’s leaders push for more authoritarian rule with the assistance of big corporations, who by the way will shed more jobs as the impending grasp of accountability seeks to press them to pony up their share, and attacks the strategy of off-shore tax shelters.

More small businesses will go under because they cannot garner the subsidies awarded to large, often criminally complicit, conglomerates who can afford to buy legislators and pay lobbyists.

In this economic hail storm integrity is the new guillotine buzz-word for assuring one gets a pink slip, and the miscreant observer, shaking down consumers for kicks, is the new pro-talent in a corporate world that will spend more on lawyers and judicial bribes than they will on coming into compliance with the law.

Barack Obama’s Wall Street pandering and defunct foreign policies -- feigning diplomacy with a hidden dagger -- have only succeeded in further destabilizing the real estate market and sent shockwaves around the planet which will take decades to subside.

Countries such as Haiti are getting a full helping of Obama’s slight of hand as he furthers the aims of foreign companies which daily disregard the will of the common citizens who make up that nation. He has conscripted the United States Military for the express purpose of nation building while the Americans daily lose jobs, homes and lives here at home.

Nowadays breaking news in the nation has become an entirely less than genuine helping of pragmatic propaganda dished out by a monopoly of media moguls who have gobbled up much of the nation’s news deliver network as it went bankrupt in the slide to the bottom.

To all of the preposterous purveyors of disproportionate distraction, who obviously are doing everything they can to destroy this country’s auspicious heritage…“Do me favor and hold the applause until we crash…will ya !?”