factbat.com

Congressman Ron Paul, a true conservative republican from the state of Texas, has been the voice of reason and sober analysis within this nation's legislative body for decades, indefatigably honoring his oath of office as he courageously and unceremoniously upholds, protects and defends the principles of equal opportunity and personal accountability outlined in the documents so long ago drafted by America's founding fathers. And he has done so with a grace and poise that is rarely, if ever, seen - and even less appreciated - on capitol hill.

Dr. Paul, an obstetrician (i.e. a champion of the gift of life) who has delivered thousands of babies during his fastidious career, is so dedicated to this country, and its promise of liberty, that he graciously eschews his own personal viewpoint on "right to life" out of respect for the constitutional values of autonomy and accountability which indelibly place the "power to choose" - and thus the duty to correct any inequity created - directly in the hands of the people and the state legislatures wherein they elect to reside.

His ability to speak, absent the aid of a teleprompter, on any topic, to large crowds of people, with credible confidence and accountability belies a noble soul which proves him to possess the leadership qualities of an illustrious Captain, commanding spirited action through example rather than callous threats and demands; thus courageously preserving life in the face of death rather than complacently delivering subjugate flesh to the slaughter.

Under a Ron Paul presidency, the power of this nation's national defense would exceed all others for the past fifty years, while simultaneously reducing the military budget by streamlining the chain of command, opening channels to communication rather than blind collaboration, and bringing nation-building troops back home where they are most needed.

Ron Paul is quite obviously a man who literally resonates with the principle forces of nature as he clearly defines his position to be that of a public servant who's unwavering compliance with the "truths we find to be self evident" prohibits him from misusing the Executive Office as a station of power.

It is the man who readily admits his powerlessness over others whom remains prepared to "hit the ground running" in defense of all.

Paul has been delivering the identical message of limited government, fiscal responsibility, legislative accountability, transparency, American self reliance, free market economy, auditing the Federal Reserve, and respecting the inalienable rights of all people, during his entire time in office. He is not simply mouthing the words like so many other candidates whom are now agreeing with Dr. Paul because his logical and ethical analogies have become popular sentiments.

Remarkably, one of the only accusations Paul's opponents can sling at him is that he is allegedly racist. And merely due to the fact that a few - less than objective - pamphlets which voiced concerns about the illicit actions of racial groups were printed with Dr. Paul's organization's name on them. And his opponents publicly accuse him of bigotry regardless of the fact that Dr. Paul has denounced the statements as obscene and unwarranted, and has explained that he never had any specific knowledge of the statements, or any direct affiliation with those who printed them.

Furthermore, Dr. Paul has always demonstrated a clearly unbiased character in both word and deed in all of his personal and professional affairs. And there is not one example anywhere of him ever behaving even remotely racist; either for or against anyone.

The first of two guarantees in this article is that Ron Paul does not even possess the ability to be a racist. His primary focus, directed pointedly at personal accountability and autonomy, does not provide the room necessary for a scope of racially biased dissemination; thus preventing him from discriminating against anyone based on a birthright attribute such as the color of their skin, their gender or nationality.

Some would also attempt to claim that Dr. Paul wants to "legalize drugs", insinuating that his supporters are merely criminals. However, this mendaciously deleterious sentiment - denigrating a great deal of law abiding, hard working and intelligent citizens of significant note - ignores Dr. Paul's conctrete Constitutional compliance, since he has only ever sought to "decriminalize" the act of smoking cannabis (as California has done), and informed the public that this nation's Constitution does not allow the government to prohibit, by law, the use of any illicit substance. This nation's founding documents only provide protection against the parameters of criminality, of which the "freedom of choice" issue of drug use does not even come close to satisfying.

His support for relaxing the government's strangle-hold on the illicite drug trade is the result of a reasonable and honorable position, wherein he realizes that Richard Nixon's profligate "War on Drugs" has shamelessly destroyed the lives of hundreds of millions of unwitting, emotionally exasperated, people, and literally overnight built the empires of the most brutal and powerful criminals this world has ever seen.

Those who have found themselves in an environment which drives them to seek escape from reality are not merely suffering from drug addiction. These people are an pervasive example of our most severe societal dysfunctions, and are easily rehabilitated when one truly disseminates a reasonable acount of their plight, thus seeking to indemnify the persons themselves rather than their addiction.

Ron Paul is a man who full-well understands the gravity of this nation's currently perilous situation, and the fact that "the government does not have the right to tell the people what to do", or what to like or not like. He realizes that it has been the government's excessive meddling in the personal affairs of the people which is responsible for the many meteoric eruptions and cataclysmic crashes - both social and economic - that have nearly torn this nation assunder over the last century.

The government's responsibilty is to uphold, protect and defend this nation's Supreme Law of the Land; namely, the United States Constitution. It is neither their right nor their responsibility to create special rules for specific groups of people or individuals, nor take sides on any issue other than that wich shall reflect the primary tenets of this nation's founding documents.

Unlike Dr. Paul, many in this nation's government exibit absolutely no respect, whatsoever, for The Constitution, or its principles. But, on the contrary, seek only to craft orations rife with empty words which they can spew upon the masses, riling them with obscenity in an effort to procure, or retain, a position of authority.

Unfortunately, this exposes the fact that America's citizens are the ones whom are, first and foremost, responsible for the corrupt debacle the government has become. Much like the majority of politicians, the majority of this nation's citizens have no respect for their Constitution, as they incessantly demand that those they vote for ignore their oath office, and instead act in deference to the collective bidding of constituents, regardless of whether their demands are Constitutional, or many times, even ethical.

Barrack Obama was primarily elected by people who were expecting him to take sides against those whom they despise. The majority of those who voted for Obama are people who live a vengeful and recalcitrant existence, blaming any number of people and places for their personal predicament. Many of these people are the "occupiers" and malcontents who believe that the government should be granted the power to take from the rich and give to the poor.

The majority of Obama's supporters appear to be shameless racists, and have been rewarded with extreme bigotry on many levels, regardless of the fact that Obama campaigned - quite deceptively - as the one who would end racism in this country. The problem is that Barack Obama's underlying message - for those who were listening - was that he would merely seek to tip the scales in the opposite direction.

Just as poorly motivated are those who voted for the George Bush's, primarily because they were both "company men" who could be counted on to accept personal rewards for protecting the criminal exploits of the bankers and Wall Street cronies, while simultaneously crafting a web of control that would allow the felonious Federal Reserve, the Clinton coddled IMF, and the Kissinger crafted Counsel on Foreign Relations to enter into unabashed nation building.

Truth be told, all of the Bush men are depraved hawks who are entirely willing to feed every last one of this nation's patriotic sons and daughters to the gold plated war machine that lines their pockets with oil-stained dollars.

Contrarily, Ron Paul is the kind of man who, as president of the United States, would actually save lives during any armed clash of ideals, by preventing naked aggression with reasonable conflict, and thus preserving humanity's natural proclivity to disagree. The man, himself, is an expression of progress in that he never attempts to avoid dissention, but rather welcomes it with aplomb. His unwavering respect for the purity of the argument sets him apart from nearly every other legislator on the hill.

Paul's decorum during nationally televised debates shows him to be an expressly shrewd negotiator who will not bend to weak winds, and will force any true threat to bellow its impediment. He, as a congressman, routinely votes against bills of his own crafting if other legislators have introduced unconstitutional amendments and pork barrel spending into its text in their attempt to sneak them through an unsuspecting body of voters.

Dr. Paul is, of course, a kind and sharp spoken man, his is the nature of a true closer. A man moved not by petty regards of blustering sycophants and despots, yet sensitive to the quizzical glance cast by the oft-disregarded and marginalized granite of this nation's foundation; the working class.

Ron Paul is a man who, as president, would steer America's ship back onto its initial course of true prosperity, braving the swells of carpetbaggers and califates which have smothered nearly all of the last ten presidencies with a mendacious morbidity of pleas for the plight of the poverty stricken and oppressed, cutting their cream nearly to the bottom

Ron Paul's message is that of capabilities rather than disabilities, heart rather than hope. His egalitarian presence, seasoned with a paucity of pragamatism, is the essence of a character rich in personal accountability, seeking to master the equations rather than pretend to manipulate the solutions.

This nation need not suffer the poor, but rather, properly reward the efforts of the many whom suffer the rich. Take not from the wealthy, for it is the frugal whom have gifted them their station. Men are not created equal, simply equally allowed. The essential formulae must be designed to shift the balance by reducing poverty with nothing more than an increase of equal opportunity, and thereby bless this nation, as it so well deserves.  

Take heart, one and all, for this nation is still so great that, against all odds, it created a Ron Paul...Yeah, baby!!! And he has been serving this nation like a benevolent and loving father for decades, shining like a beacon of liberty at the edge of a jetty staunchly piercing this nation's pounding sea of sanguine senility and powerful corruption.

The man possesses an unflappable courage few even understand, and is a leader of the finest order.

So the question remains; is America truly worthy of - or ready for - a "Ron Paul Presidency"?

This author worries that it is not. And for anyone who disagrees, I dare you...no, I double dare you, prove me wrong, and vote for this honorable man. Vote for an executive public servant who will hold you accountable to the principles you claim to fight for.

I challenge you all, prove your true worth. Prove you are a real American, and vote for a just commander in chief...vote for Ron Paul.

Guaranteed, once this nation gets a taste of Dr. Paul's executive office, his re-election will be by a landslide.

By: Dane Wilson. 20 January 2011, 4:45 pm.

As the nation is treated to boring investigations into whether or not President Barack Obama dyes his hair, the important points of political strategy slowly creep into the minds of the masses. Here is an in depth preview of the many colorful highlights that are certain to go splashing across the national canvass as the portrait of a one-term president continues to unfold.

In the current theatre of double-takes, the most perplexing thing about President Obama's political strategy is that his cries of defeat often appear to be an effective bid for support. However, the demographic he is able to fool with his smooth rhetorical style and vague sensibilities is rarely well informed, and therefore will never be able to assist him in shaking his image as a "one-termer."

Barack Obama campaigned on little more than appeals to racial angst that, many times, had long-since been laid to rest, and a proletariat persona that he, not only does not possess, but also appears to utterly detest.

This deceptive image that won Obama the presidency has been his bane during his entire administration because of a lack of any concurring intuition that would cause him to make decisions which complimented it.

Obama needed to appear a "man of the people" while simultaneously pandering to the whims of his banker buddies and congressional cohorts. Therefore he has incessantly sided with the limousine liberals, indefensible ideologues (which he is clearly one of) and paternally-preposterous pragmatists, in an effort to defend his languishing policies of pre-emptive war, deficit spending, government intrusion, market manipulation and political secrecy.

President Obama has rarely, if ever, truly listened to the many voters whom elected him into office, and certainly ignores the hundreds of millions of voters in this country that did not.

His defiance to the will of the people, and refusal to uphold and defend their constitution, has ensconced him with an irreparable image as an abysmal failure. Now his rather tardy strategy of admitting he was literally handed his ass for a hat, by those he defied, will not somehow regain him their confidence he so foolishly squandered.

He can certainly be guaranteed that no amount of sweet-talking or shows of affection for fallen hero's will cause the majority of the voters in this nation to ever forget his many golf outings, vacations, lavish parties and celebrity suck-ups that took precedent over the concerns of the workers and business-owners of Louisiana's main-street during the Gulf Oil Crisis.

Nor will he ever be able to eschew his hawkish image in the eyes of the millions of friends and family of the military personnel who have been killed because of his irresponsible engagements in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Iran and Israel.

Obama promised to engage those regions with fresh diplomacy that would ensure a timely end to the violence, and contempt that he accused the Bush administration of master-minding. However, he not only refused to honor this promise, he proved his lack of intuitive-diplomacy as he escalated the conflict and expertly crafted further ones.

Obama's veiled preferential treatment of corporate constituents and defense contractors as part of this strategy, have also stained him in ways that will forever surface through any attempts to white-wash them.

In the fight against Obama's socialist policies, the many demands, and current legislative decisions, for the repeal of Obamacare is another time-bomb he can never live down, regardless of how hard he tries to pretend that it is of no consequence. Furthermore, it is his constant denial of this inept program's many discrepancies, disparities and delusions which will haunt his bid for re-election in 2012.

Barack Obama has even stifled his image of alleged concern for human life that most were fooled by because their unwitting racism allowed them to believe that the man's skin color must mean he is a pro-life politician. So many of this nation's voters assumed that Obama had experienced hardship and racially biased struggles because he is black. But unfortunately, much of this "slavery-sentiment" is not as legitimate as the average citizen believes.

That Barack Obama so contemptibly exploited his race amid burgeoning ignorance concerning discrimination, is more than despicable considering that he has lived the majority of his life in a very privileged environment.

However, the fact that Obama pretended he was a minority is actually not as deceptive as people would think. Since he actually is a minority, but only in the sense that he has been afforded a very privileged existence that the majority of the people in this world do not even know exists. His involvement with the Bilderberg Group clearly exposes his Plutocratic Roots. (The Bilderberg Group is a cadre of ultra-rich manipulators called the De Bilderbergers; a Dutch creation which found its inception in the early 1940s in Oosterbeek, Netherlands during their first meeting at the De Bilderberger Hotel. The various members meet every year in secret and illegally plan political shenanigans, market strategies and international events).

Given his professed Kenyan roots, Obama's obsequious engagement with this racist organization should present as extremely odious in light of the fact that it was the Dutch plutocracy that waged all-out war in South Africa and forced its citizens to succumb to authoritarian rule where the official South African language was changed to Afrikaans in a successful effort to supplant the Boers as the rulers of that territory. (Afrikaans was the language of the 17th century Boers settlers).

Barack Obama will also have to answer many questions concerning videos and documents which expose his contemptible lies denying involvement with the criminal organization ACORN, and the fact that he doted on its members, played an integral role in training its leaders, vowed to include its primary members in his everyday operations as President of the United States, and assisted various locations in fraudulent voter practices.

But probably most debilitating of all will be the many questions regarding his involvement in the real estate scandals that gripped this nation and sent so many into the streets during the 2007-9 economic meltdown it helped to create.

Barack Obama's many duplicitous engagements within the Democratic Black Caucus -- where he pushed for legislation that put millions of home-owners at risk, with Sub-prime structures that enabled rampant corruption in the housing market, will be impossible to evade. Especially given the fact that he and his other partners-in-crime, such as Hillary Clinton, were the top recipients of campaign contributions from Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac; two of the top recipients of bail-out monies that the majority of the voting public has unwaveringly repudiated throughout Barack Obama's one-term presidency.

However, his close collusion with the criminal elements in the