factbat.com

A new article that is flogging the same old flaccid - and largely diminutive - subject of Global Warming has recently appeared in the New York Times.

Regardless of the fact that proponents of AGW (anthropogenically-caused global warming) prematurely blew their wad last year when it was proven that the data supporting their claims was being fudged by those packing it for transmission, the city of Chicago is now proving this homogenous fallacy to be just too tempting a spectacle for their anal advisors to resist.

The New York Times article, titled "The Long Hot Forecast", is about as brief on reality as it is extensive on reprimand. Astonishingly, the author attempts to convince readers that Chi Town is some sort of leader of a progressive movement simply because the leadership there is finally beginning to allow the implementation of much needed practicality in the maintenance of its municipalities, insinuating that they may actually be putting tax dollars to good use, and taking responsibility for designing the city in such a way as to begin to compensate for the extreme weather patterns which have plagued its citizens, and been a part of that city's identity, since it was founded. (nytimes.com, 01 June 2011)

The NYT claims that "much of the rest of the nation is stuck in climate-change denial, or passive fretfulness" as it lauds Chicago's leaders for "making long term preparations for a warmer, stormier climate". However, they are doing nothing more than repairing infrastructure malfunctions that are long overdue.

In complete cooperation with the contemporarily-common cur of complacently crafted calculations corroborated by cardiganed carpetbaggers caterwauling a coming catastrophe of consequences in the comprehensive cookhouse of the future, the NYT is basing assertions of fact on little more than the crystal ball ethos of one Leslie Kaufman who reported in The Times that "By the end of the century [Chicago] will feel more like Baton Rouge, La." Claiming that "other cities should pay attention".

Unfortunately, Kaufman has no actual proof to support his claims, except reciprocating data that has no bench mark to sustain it, and thus his are nothing more than illegitimate assumptions.

His article is merely based on extrapolations of nascent statistics that do not in any way compensate for the various changes in spatial contexts that this planet will be experiencing as it enters uncharted coordinates that are unaccompanied by data which would allow plausible reasearch into what might be expected.

The article reports that Chicago is preparing for climate change. However, they are merely implementing various strategies in their overall public sector that reflect an addressal of the needs that were apparent over many decades, but largely ignored.

Now, since the climatologists are finding fresh federal funding that reflects the city government's plans to employ radicalized environmentalists and eugenicists as busy bodies that can help them twist the collective corporate arm of the state, the coffers are brimming with new surpluses that once again are paralyzed by red tape that alllows the policy makers to neglect the truly needy.

While it is certainly a fact that the Earth will eventually experience a full 10 degrees Celsius fluctuation, where the mean global temperature will rise from 12 to 22 degrees centigrade, this will occur over millions of years, rather than mere decades, and has no connection to high global CO2 levels. (factbat.com, 20 March 2008)

It appears that insurance companies are being bent over a pork barrel, and terrified by the possibility of huge payouts should these, and their catastrophic consequences, become a reality. This means that there is a fresh set of hellish premiums for anyone who intends to live or do business near any body of water that the alleged experts can claim will be effected by the basically nostalgic threat of extreme sea level rises.

Can anybody say "psyche!"? It would be best for people to plan for earthquakes as the Earth begins to enter its cycle of expansion based on the coming polarity shift. This planet's gravitational affection for spherical nuances that will allow its core to gyrate into an altered position will bring about various effects that, while gradual and wide spread, will usher in a new era of intercontinental residency that most people are, as yet, unaccustomed to.

The most onerous real-time implications, however, are found in the fact that much of the insurance industry discovered itself buried under extreme economic duress as a result of the government's incessant meddling in the markets, both national and international. And now both the insiders and outsiders are equally paying a dear price for jumping into bed with the politicians.

Further posturing with visions of widespread pandemonium, the article - rambunctiously shouting its reportedly factual attack from the NYT "Opinion" section - even goes so far as to irrelevantly cite a deadly "one-week heat wave in 1995" in Chicago that allegedly was solely responsible for the deaths of nearly 740 people, as proof that AGW exists.

It's no wonder the article has no by-line. Whomever is responsible for composing this simplistic, silly symptomatic display of ceremonial supposition surely has no evidence to actually support any of the claims inculpated within the pompous pith this piece is contaminated with.

This author was actually a resident of Chicago in 1995, and I can personally attest to the fact that the heat wave was only a side issue, that was not, in any direct fashion, responsible for the many deaths associated with that year'Ëœs summer swelter. Furthermore, there are also an inordinate number of cold related deaths in the region each year.

The primary cause of the fatalities from heat stroke during the summer of 1995 was the lack of air conditioning in the many urban areas that are populated with veritable human beehives, stacked in roasting rows over an asphalt skillet.

These typically derelict tenement projects are home to some of the poorest and infirmed persons in the city, and a vast majority of them cannot afford common creature comforts that most people take for granted.

Therefore, when these suffocating residences turn into human ovens, a common luxury like air conditioning becomes critical to one's survival. And since many of the residents are incapacitated to the point that they can no longer venture outdoors without assistance, they eventually succumb to this inhospitable environment, and die.

However, this travesty is the result of a system that tolerates many typically self-serving politicians whom are not confined to any set precedent that would force them to service this dire need. And thus they simply ignore the writing on the wall that any half wit could easily decipher as warning of a tragedy just waiting to happen.

Truly, the criminal elements allowed to run amok in this Midwestern city are not reserved to the crack dealers, thugs, pimps and gangs that control large potions of its bullet scorched north, west and south sides.

The victims of public corruption are much more at risk than any you would find on this Great Lakes city's means streets, and most of the average population does not even realize the vast majority of them that suffer at the hands of politicians who routinely consider one particular demographic as nothing more than a nuisance.

This demographic is the elderly and infirmed whom exist on the meager allowance of a federally fixed income. And Chicago's utilities companies have absolutely no qualms about shutting off these peoples' gas and electricity if and when they become unable to pay the exorbitant rates that these suppliers typically charge.

Furthermore, it is no longer a secret that companies routinely abuse and neglect the frail and elderly. Enron is a prime example of just how callous and greedy the average utilities company expects to be allowed to operate. And Chicago's severely corrupt leadership has, for decades, been all too willing to support and facilitate the rapacious environment of recompense that these money-hungry suppliers demand.

Of course, that region's pathetic political spectrum is currently refracted throughout the White House, since Obama's chief of apoplectic incompetence, Rahm Emanuel, was elected to mayor of the same gubernatorial gangland gazpacho that somehow made Barack Obama's flea ridden carcass appear a palatable democratic dish that so many in this nation are blindly swallowing.

Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama both hail from the windy city, and are both lifetime members of a gay men's bathhouse in uptown Chicago named "Man's Country". There relationship, however unscrupulous it may have become at this point, is quite obviously an intricately established one.

Is it any surprise, then, that Emanuel is now part of a questionable quid pro quo which is seeking to legitimize one of the Obama administration's primary goals of haranguing the nation with an emaciating Cap and Trade system that would simultaneously thrust Obama's earmarked earning potential into the stratosphere?

The NYT article ends with a beguiling air of contemptuous blame, as it blatantly accuses the nation of ignoring some imminent doomsday on the near horizon, stating "It would be far better is there were a federal framework to plan a guide the nation's adaptation to the challenging years ahead."

However, it does not take a genius to realize that without a clear definition of what lies ahead, any "framework" would be largely a waste of time and resources. As well as the fact that it could become just one more unstable structure that would imperial all who reside within it in a veritable collapsing coffin.

How irresponsible and insipid of the NYT to portend that such bombastic pressure tactics be placed upon the entire nation. Especially since all the real data to date proves that the Earth is experiencing record low temperatures in many geographical locations that are typically hot and arid. As well as the fact that the last two winters were some of the coldest on record across the entire United States.

What a shameless rag of rhetorical propaganda the New York Times has become. And it is likely due to the fact that most people are now looking to more reputable sources for their information. What is remarkable is that the data is clear on this subject, however, this publication does not appear to have any intention of altering its own deplorable tactics of appealing to the most ignorant and idiotically idealistic readers in the nation.

If Cap and Trade is allowed to run its course, Barack Obama will become the toast of every black hat aristocrat that this nation's money laundering back rooms and basements can hold. And the rolls of treasonous treasury troubadours who play to the warbling witchcraft of Wall Street fat cats - as they howl their malapropos melody of milk and honey - will bury this nation's main street in one destructive, invasive and repressive mechanism after another until everything is under the control of those who are either running, or running for, the government.

The corruption that would ensue under the insolent - and unwarranted - Cap and Trade tax scheme would raise, not only the prices of nearly every product on the market for the next century, but also an iron clad staircase of oblique and obligatory oppression for nearly every criminal of this nation's future political paradigm to climb up, over and out of reach of the people.

The blasphemous bureaucracies that the average government agency will interminably insist on representing under this scheme - while simultaneously selling the citizens down one of the most swift and predacious rivers of revenue creation this world has ever even heard of - will eventually become so out of control that the populous at large will be forced to dam it up in order to save the free market from the powerful and deadly claws of a fetid fascism run amok.

References:

NYT Article, "The Long Hot Forecast"; @ http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/01/opinion/01wed4.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha211

Factbat.com article, "Cold Facts on the Hot Topic"; @

http://www.factbat.com/blog/2008/4/13/cold-facts-on-the-hot-topic.html

Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has given a clear indication that his defiant and nearsighted leadership is primarily responsible for the lack of demonstrable progress in the Israeli-Palestinian crisis.

Netanyahu, after meeting with President Barack Obama - following a speech from Obama calling for demarcation of Israel and Palestine along pre 1967 boundaries - offered broad statements of basic defiance that showed both his lack of willingness to cooperate, and his excessively impractical nature. (msnbc.com; Israel Rejects Border Proposal)

Israel is being excoriated for its inhospitable actions on a wider scale than it has been in the past, and it is in large part due to the decisions of its leaders who incessantly expect to remain incomprehensibly xenophobic while simultaneously combative against even the most basic forms of human discrimination.

Netanyahu claims that Israel "wants peace, I want peace. What we all want is peace that will be genuine, that will hold, that will endure".

However, as could be expected, he sought to indemnified his - and his nation's - many aggressive and inhospitable actions against Palestinians, Jordanians and Egyptians, insinuating that they are/were necessary to create peace as he exclaimed "I think we both agree that a peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle Eastern reality -- for there to be peace, the Palestinians will have to accept some basic realities."

Brazenly biting the hand that feeds him, Netanyahu perfunctorily defied the Obama administration's consensus that in the interest of a peaceful accord, the lines of the nations should reflect those that existed prior to the "six days war" where Israel took lands from Egypt, Jordan and Syria.

The surprise attack, primarily by the Israeli air force - and likely assisted by a covert ally in France - was an emaciating first strike on the Egyptian air force that gave Israel massive air superiority for the rest of the war, and was largely in response to the closing of the Straits of Tiran by Gamal Abdel Nasser, Egypt's president.

Israel effectively took control of the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. There are still many who contend that Israel's attack was an act of aggression, rather than a preemptive strike of defense. (Wikipedia.org)

Furthermore, it was Israeli leaders whom demanded that any closing of the Straits would be considered "an act of war". And since there appears to be evidence that deceptive and false reports were delivered to Nasser, allegedly from the Soviet Union, saying that Israel was massing on the Syrian border, the closing of the Strait of Tiran would have been a logical move.

It is no secret that Israel has often employed espionage and deception as a means of gaining a military advantage, or fomenting crises which either appear to warrant retaliation or directly create it. And what is most notable is that Israel rarely suffers any initial casualties prior to a full scale retaliation where the targeted nation sustains heavy casualties.

Israel has also consistently defied international authority, such as during the 1949 Armistice where Israel secretly brokered a deal to disregard the "green line" of the General Armistice Agreement and expelled the entire population of Wadi Fukin after the village had been illegally transferred to an Israeli-occupied area.

The Mixed Armistice Commission found that Israel had violated the agreement, and voted that the villagers should be allowed to return to their homes. But Israel's common practice of destroying the houses of civilians as they steal their land forced the villagers, prodded by further demands from the Israeli military, to return to Jordan controlled territory. (Wikipedia.org)

Netanyahu, refusing to even consider the 1967 boundaries, even went so far as to pretend that there have been no provisions made for the security of various settlements that were built outside of those borders as he claimed that they would be "indefensible because they don't take into account certain changes that have taken place on the ground, demographic changes -- over the last 44 years."

However, the proposal by the Obama administration clearly allows for any number of various land swaps in order to secure and satisfy both nations. Furthermore, Netanyahu appears to believe that simply because over four decades have passed, that suddenly the issue of misappropriated lands is not open to debate.

The Israeli Prime Minister even began to dredge up outdated, historical incidences that are both irrelevant and controversial. He shows his intent to exhume long dead conflicts when stating "Remember that before 1967 Israel was all of nine miles wide -- they were the boundaries of repeated wars because the attack on Israel was so attractive."

The primary inequity in Netanyahu's statements is the fact that much of the attacks on Israel were those of retaliation for attacks perpetrated by Israel against other nations.

Israel, with the help of allies in Britain and France, attacked Egypt in 1956 while denying it was a collusive effort. The attack was in response to Egypt's new ties with the Soviet Union and recognition of the People's Republic of China, and Nasser's choice to nationalize the Suez Canal and broker a deal with Russia after the US and Britain backed out of a commitment to fund the building of the Aswan Dam.

The fact is that China is no longer a dividing ally, nor is the Suez Canal a central instigator of conflict in the region. And the fact that these, and other now-retired issues, were the primary means of extending Israel's borders even prior to the 1967 conflict, the argument by Netanyahu is illegitimate.

Netanyahu, in an encroaching bid for further publicly viewed allied posturing, thanked Obama for American support, saying "I appreciate the fact that you reaffirmed, once again, now and in our conversation, and in actual deed, the commitment to Israel's security. We value your efforts to advance the peace process".

To digress for a moment. The actual critical factor in all of this is the fact that Israel does actually want peace. But simply peace, not peaceful relations. Israel just wants the compliance that a peace agreement offers, and often such agreements can be anything but agreeable to both side, regardless of the fact that they produce an end to armed aggression.

The leaders of Israel have never actual sought to enable the freedom of others as a means of eliciting equitable conviviality. And until the collective efforts of the primary players are directed at creating a lasting freedom for all nations concerned, then peace will remain nothing more than a smoldering ember of reticence that can ignite the region like a tinder box whenever the winds of discord begin to blow.

Israel, and its neighbors, must collectively embrace legitimacy in their counterparts, and their right to influence policies effectively, and based on their respective peoples' best interests.

Netanyahu also claimed that he shares Obama's "hope and [his] vision for the spread of democracy in the Middle East".

However, the only part of democracy that Netanyahu has shown himself capable of appreciating is that which follows a belief that the "majority rules", and there is little evidence that this includes anyone outside of Israeli interests.

Furthermore, Israel has done as much as any other Middle Eastern nation to profligate the belief that no other structure other than that created of, for and by Israeli's has a right to exist. And Israel has often employed religious beliefs as government policy in an attempt to justify attacks on other peoples.

The animosity that has fostered in the rich, fertile soil of religious extremism in the Arab World has been just as prolifically cultivated by Israel as it has by others in the area. But it is Israel that has so often sought the assistance of Western allies like the United States, France, and Britain as vanguards against the seething revenge they have so consistently created with their refusal to engage their neighbors respectably.

Unfortunately, in the past there were many leaders in America and Europe whom were all-to-happy to oblige in their own self interest, and ignore the rights of sovereign nations as the "red scare" and other anti-socialism campaigns authorized all manner of otherwise prohibited actions as means of eradicating what were seen to be imminent threats to the survival of the west.

A few in the field of republicans campaigning for Obama's job have begun to foam at the mouth as Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Michelle Bachmann attack Obama, claiming that he has insulted Israel.

Either they are simply politicking, or they truly revile Obama's attempts to bring some tough love to the process and begin to stringently exfoliate the endemic crisis that has long festered beneath the chafing dermis of the region.

Bachmann say's that she "was appalled to watch President Obama betray our ally Israel", also claiming that "Obama's plan would abandon decades of peacemaking efforts in the Middle East, and result in further chaos, division and more aggression." (email correspondence from Michelle Bachmann)

What is remarkable is that Bachmann completely ignores the ridiculous irony in her statement. She clearly realizes that the alleged "peacemaking process" has not been affective for "decades", but still insists that Obama has somehow imperiled a process that has not produced any lasting results to date which show it has done any good.

She also claims that this is another example of "Obama's policy of blaming Israel first." Even going so far as to claim that "Obama's words show that he is no friend of Israel".

To be fair; Obama made it clear that he considered Israel to be a friend of the United States, and stated that Israel's security is a top priority. However, he also showed an intent to remain civil and beyond reproach when stating that this friendship requires that he be honest about the situation.

Loyalty is far too often thought to be synonymous with honor, and this is just not the case. One must eschew loyalty at times and be prepared to side with an ally's opposition, providing such opposition is also honorable, if said opponent is correct, if one is to truly be an effective ally.

There are plenty of examples throughout history where an alleged friend or ally, in their own selfish interests, set their counterpart up for a fall by taking their side regardless of an obvious inequity which eventually became their demise.

Bachmann also say's that "American's know that a safer Israel is a safer world". There is actually a vast array of data that indicates the contrary, and thus her statement implies a rather impressionable and collusive atmosphere among politicians.

That Bachmann would truly believe such a statement is unlikely, and thus she must be touting the agenda of some other prospective beneficiary. And that is entirely unacceptable under any circumstances, given the nature of the subject matter, and the fact that AIPAC is a very influential organization in government.

However, Bachmann most notablly displayed her vacuity and lack of intuition last year in Los Angeles where, in a speech she said "If the United States fails to stand with Israel, that is the end of the United States".

It appears that some in the Republican field are comfortable with intemperately shuffling their way to the edge of the precipice in a straitjacket as they attempt to capitalize on any possible rift between Israel and the United States by painting it as an imminently disastrous position for the entire nation.

It makes one wonder if there is not a significant level of legitimacy to the rumors that 9/11 was the result of a collusion between covert Israeli and Western influences that were well enough connected to infiltrate even the most highest levels of government in America.

It is well documented that Israel's Mosad (Israeli secret service) sent agent Eli Cohen to infiltrate the Syrian Government and use his high-ranking position to manipulate the Syrian military's strategy prior to the "six days war", feigning sympathy for the soldiers and convincing Syria to plant trees that allowed Israel to mark their position. Cohen also gathered crucial intelligence for Israel that allowed the Israeli military to strike the Golan Heights area from positions that were largely indefensible by Syria.

It is also well established that Israel's air force was secretly preparing for weeks, and possibly even months, to carry out a surprise attack on Egypt's air fields, thus giving ample reason to believe that the various instigators that Israel claims were legitimate reasons to attack its neighbors were likely just the result of counter-intelligence operations aimed at deceptively creating a "false flag" event that would appear to justify their actions.

Israel's various documented, and otherwise obvioius, scurrilous and underhanded tactics, perpetrated by its leaders and security forces, are inexorably paiinting a clear portrait of a country that cannot be counted on to engage the international community legitimately.

In the interest of the nation and the many honorable and tenacious citizens of America, it must henceforth be reasonably assumed that Israeli espionage is almost certainly one of the lynchpins that is working to manipulate and destablize much of America's foreign policy structure, and corrupting its government with agents whom are secretly coopting its members if the United States is to truly make inroads toward a lasting and equitable accord with the Middle East.

References:

1949 Armistice Agreements; @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1949_Armistice_Agreements

1956 Suez Canal Crisis; @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis

MSNBC article @ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43106082/ns/politics-white_house/t/we-cant-go-back-israeli-pm-rejects-border-proposal/

Beyonce's new video "Run the World (girls)" is clearly gender biased, and one of the strangest displays of apoplectic human disregard on the hip-hop market today.

I never would have actually watched this entire - let's face it, extremey less-than-talented music diatribe - if it were not for the fact that I found it disturbingly misguided, and thus felt it imperative to write an article about it.

The direction that Beyonce and also much of the music industry's popular artists are intending to drag this nation is alarming, as they spend obviously hundreds of billions of dollars to create grandiose presentations of defunct social distortion that are only intended to satisfy the droves of starving minds that have become emaciated by the daily diet of divisiveness that leaves them malnourished but bloated.

Beyonce is only offering the needle of necromantic nuance, injecting the ignorant and criminally derisive minds that inhabit specific portions of the world. Namely, the young and impressionable whom simply exist under mom and dad's roof, seeking any means of rebellion against a structured environment, and of course the millions of misfortunates who blame everybody else for their problems.

Beyonce's indelibly self-worshipping, heavily voice modulated and creepy dance video is anything but the praise of women that it bills itself as.

Who cares that she does it in clothes from the latest designer. That she needs to persuade people with excessively edited videos of her in extravagent pop-culture dress, and elicit the support of expensive designers, only detracts from the atmosphere of actual talent the art is expected to exude.

Whitney Houston, with all of her set-backs, still out-shines Beyonce any day of the week. And she does it with poise and grace. Her latest tour "Nothing But Love" says it all, and was a terrific success.

Beyonce has only served to further the world of gender bias and hateful discrimination against others by precociously proposing that "we run this mutha-f--er" ad nauseam. Her video is every bit as bad as a racially discriminatory and repressive Nazi or Klan rally.

However, she has been allowed to spew her sick, depraved and - again, let's face it, misanthropic melody - across the entire planet where she is being hailed by every hate-filled sycophant and salacious sophist that watches it.

Beyonce's video is no better than the Narcorrido songs and their sick subculture that is invading from this nation's southern borders, and which are supported almost entirely by gangbangers, gun runners, drug cartels and the mountains of ready cash that their criminal exploits generate.

The rest of this "commando-style conscience copulation" (aka "mindf---k") is supported by the growing number of lethargic citizens in Mexico who choose to worship the Santa Muerta (Saint Death) and sell pirated and stolen merchandise on their black market as they inhale glue, and do drugs while worshipping at shrines. This is their self-defeating and recalcitrant reaction to the poverty and squalor that is being created by the government corruption in Mexico that has allowed drug cartels to take over much of the country.

Is America truly no more capable than its sqanderous southern neighbor? Are the citizens in this country truly going to allow the boisterous criminal element to define the road ahead, controlled by a mob of intemperate reprobates that spend most of their time getting high and dreaming of being somebody, and then react with violence and upheaval to the foibles they allow to proliferate with their recidivist ways?

This nation has an extremely healthy foundation that is inexorably bound to documents of clear human compunction where truths that are found to be "self evident" are the lynchpins that speak out loudly and viciously against just the kind of blind acrimony and broadbased bigotry that Beyonce is intending to use as a means of creating riotous and myopic defiance, likened to mutiny, that she can personally profit from.

Of course, she incessantly attempts to use her vagina to sell herself to whatever audience that has the stomach to watch her whore herself for the camera. I could barely sit through the entire pandering and pugnacious prostitution of it all, and I am an extremely virile male who adore's women. However, I am inexorably bound to respect them regardless of how much they may disrespect themselves. And I require a much more elevated level of behavior than do most men I encounter.

I was recently extremely impressed by the speech that Barack Obama gave on May 19th about a "More Perfect Union" where he addressed the audience at Constitution Center in Philadelphia, PA. on matters such as race, gender equality and the fundamental path for America.

The Obama administration actually appears to be "getting it", and while I do understand that it is speech writers and advisors whom are primarily responsible for composing the message, it is the President who has the final word. I must admit that Obama swung for the fence on this one ... and connected.

In contrast to his bleacher bound, base rounding blast is the beguiling bromide bunt that Beyonce has unleashed into the infield.

Are the many conscioniable and egalitarian citizens of this nation going to just remain silent and idle, allowing her robitically mechanized and egotistical voice of vacuity and dysfunction to profit from the creation of destructive demoralization. Will we just sit and shake our heads as denizens of dime-store dilletantes peck and paw at the flesh of the very hand that feeds them?

Stand up tall and proud America, as Egypt and Libya have done, and cast off the blinders of vengeance. Refuse to live in the self-imposed shackles of shame and sanctimonious severance that the egomaniacal establishment so often attempts to sell to the masses; praising them for compliance with the corruption.

Beyonce is nothing more than an opportunistic and maladjusted hater who is attempting to ride the latest roller coaster of angst that will surely drag her vociferously vehement vacillations, and those who follow them like a pied pipers tune, to the depths - as the sea of change that is gripping this world rises to the fall.

How trite that Beyonce shows absolutely no concern whatsoever for the vindictiveness and loathing that she is warranting as she selfishly appeals to the peoples' lesser nature, and targets the lowest common denominator as a means of building her personal bank account and sedentary celebrity status.

Be certain that Beyonce will not be there to contribute to the need that she is creating when the effects of her poverty and crime creating callousness brings the walls of reality crashing in against her fans.

What a shame...what a low, down, dirty shame.

In a recent press conference, one ABC reporter asks Obama a pointed question concerning the administration's willingness to do nothing more than exacerbate the crisis in Libya.

Obama has done nothing but work against the legitimate people of that nation by irresponsibly engaging the situation and affecting the strategic balance in favor of Qaddafi, as the people now suffer from his ineptitude and disingenuous meddling; paying dearly for his mistakes, with thier lives.

"Are you concerned that because you've imposed all of these sanctions, that Qaddafi feels cornered and there's no other option in his mind but to keep fighting, keep fighting, and in the words of your director of national intelligence, he may have the fire power to potentially win this stand off with the rebels." the ABC reporter asked.

To which Obama nonchalantly replies "I do, I am concerned absolutely. And I think that's why it's so important for us not to stop where we are, but to continue to find options that will add additional pressure."

Except that all Obama does is stop. He does not follow any logical course to anywhere meaningful. The fact that he fought so hard to pass Obamacare shows that all he can do is complete a goal. He has no ability to truly chart a course without a specific point of reference directly in front of him. He will never be able to lead this nation. He will only drag it through the mud on his way to one mirage after another.

It must be understood that this Universe does not allow humanity to ever reach any goal. It is a farce that one has ever done so. This is due to the fact that the planet is constantly evolving on a course that is traveling over 167,000 miles per hour through space. This unequivocally guarantees that one cannot even walk from their front door to the mail box, because it will never be the same mailbox that it was when they left the porch.

Make no mistake about it, this is inexplicable fact, and to realize just what this implies is part of mastering one's destiny. Furthermore, it is imperative to truly understanding the Universe we live in.

Obama goes on to say that his options include "sending a clear message to those around Qaddafi, that the world is watching, and that we're paying attention, and that there have been referrals to the international criminal court."

However, Obama knows full well that too little to late is an effective strategy for fulminating extreme animosities. But then, Obama is well versed in this, and is a hater of the highest order.
 
His lack of action are extremely effective actions in themselves because of the influence of his position. For Obama to do nothing is one of the most decisive actions a president can take, and it is borderine criminality since he is in a position that is afforded various levels of immunity that can then be mechanized into a clear impunity. What a truly undesirable person this nation must tolerate for two more years.

Obama seriously needs to be impeached. But then this legislature will never do it, and for one reason only. They don't want to set a precedent for actually doing their job, primarily for fear that it will start a trend of actual accountability. Plus, any person impeached is never again allowed to hold any office of trust or profit in the United States, and that would start another trend of tossing the miscreant thugs in the echelons of American society straight into the gutter where they belong, and then they could never again be used as scapegoats. Deplorable, to say the least.

Conversely, the Libyan people in the east are experimenting with their new-found liberty, and being literally transformed in an instant into honorable, caring and insightful people that are finding compassion and hope welling up in their hearts for the people of Japan. It is occurring just as it should.

All people of the Earth must begin to understand just what freedom really is, and the power of personal responsibility and cooperation that is blossoms into. The indiscretions of a society are directly proportionate to denials of freedom...true freedom, not the plastic and corroded freedom that much of the United States is now apportioned.

Obama goes on to say "part of what we're gonna be wanting to do is to change the balance, not just militarily inside of Libya, but also to change the balance in terms of those who are around Qaddafi, and are thinking about what their future prospects are if they continue down the course that they're on."

What a completely ridiculous and apathetic statement. If the past four decades are any indication at all of just what one can expect, then Qaddafi's brutality and crimes against humanity will be rewarded with a fresh "stash" of weaponry and personnel supplied by the American Military Industrial Complex and whatever other sycophant bureaucracy can profit form more destruction and depravity in the world.

"But, Chuck, there's no doubt I am concerned about it. Qaddafi has, a....uh, a...uh, uh stash of weapons. He not only has some troops that remain loyal to him. But there's been reports that he's also been hiring mercenaries." Said Obama.

There are more than just reports. There are videos of the tactics of these mercenaries, and many of them were captured by rebels who video taped their statements.

Remarkably, Obama expects the nation to believe that he has not seen any intelligence that proves mercenaries have been employed by the Qaddafi regime. Moreover, reports should be reason enough to investigate the possibility and clearly identify the sources. However, Obama appears to have done absolutely nothing to properly address the matter, or exfoliate the intelligence.

Obama goes on to further prove he has no intention of doing anything that will have any true effect on Qaddafi's ability to massacre the people of Libya with weapons and bombs given to him by America, saying "even with the financial freeze that we've imposed, he still has some assets. The rebel groups are just now getting organized. And so we're gonna have to continue to apply pressure." He essentially admits his impotency.

The "rebels" were organized long ago, and Obama full well knows this to be a fact. The problem is that if his close advisors lied to him and used tainted intelligence that was crafted during the Iraq war and used to justify excessive military action that suppressed actions against the United States military for criminal acts in Iraq, then he is still accountable for his actions.

The intelligence that alleges that the majority of insurgency in Iraq was from East Libya is in no way credible, and Obama should damned well know this. However it is a convenient excuse for now suppressing the freedom Obama appears to loathe. His support of the protests in Wisconsin prove him to be a mere political soclialite who despises liberty for the people, but approves of unabashed free reign for those in positions of accountability.

Mostly though, Obama is a socialist at heart and will never divert from his primary goal of fomenting or exacerbating crises as a means of exploiting the people of the world and forcing them to seek desperate measures that the government can appear to save them from. He wishes to turn the people into supplicants whom turn to him for assistance in controling of the destruction his type have caused. Just more "crisis, reaction, solution" tactics that have been the mainstay of his kind for centuries.

Obama is a single dimension analyst who is driven by nothing more than idealism. He has absolutely no intuition or insight, and all of his ideas are based on what he considers to be a viable outcome. He is only concerned with following the trajectory of the model that can be designed to bring about specific allegations of expected goals.

This administration is such that it is only capable of defining a goal, and then taking actions that are expected to culminate in that goal, or something comparable.

It is more than clear that this administration has absolutely no intention of actually leading the United States on a course of constitutional values, or actually any values at all. At this point, nearly ever single action that has been taken throughout the Obama administration's time in the White House, shows a clear agenda that cannot be altered.

This could be due to outside influences, or simply a lack of ability to act according to a set logical and legitimate rules or policies. Obama's many lackadaisical responses to crises show clear signs of a criminal mind that has no intention of truly changing anything in America, but instead only taking advantage of the fact that the people of the nation were desperate for change.

What is most indicative of the Obama machine is that it is almost sadistically resistant to any change. Obama claims to be concerned about the Libyan peoples' plight, and their fight for freedom. However, he shows by his actions that he is hoping that Qaddafi will win and possibly suppress that extremely powerful wave of freedom that is sweeping across the region.

This freedom movement certainly does not fit in with any of the professed agendas of the Obama adminstration.

However, the truth is that the sea change that has begun will not be suppressed. It may be stalled occasionally during its tectonic tempest as the tides of the evolving concepts begin to ebb and flow as nature intended, however, in this superiorly educational existentialism it will never again be forced into the dungeons of docility that have so long barred the minds of the Middle East from its true heritage.

There must be growth and decay, and Obama will find that as the world turns his certain decay will take on a whole new meaning that he could never have imagined, given the fact that he only exists as a preposterously pragmatic fool who could not tell the difference between a result and a resolution.

To the world: take this lesson to heart. The truth is that "the ends does justify the means". The question posed so long ago to the entire population of the world, which asks "does the ends justify the means" was nothing but a trick.

The fact is that the ends can only reflect the means, there is no exception. Any claim that the destructive or oppressive, liberty robbing means are going to end in a good result has always been a bald faced lie.

When they say "trust me, this distasteful ingredient is needed to make the batter taste better", it is nothing but a ruse, and the batter never tastes better. The bitterness just gets blamed on the next administration.

The only thing the deceptive dealers of death and destruction were ever intending to do is divert people's attention from the fact that none of the promised results that were ever guaranteed to the people - should they accept the less than desirable means being implemented - have ever come to pass.

The end results have merely gotten worse and worse over time. And the politicians, bureaucrats, despots, vicious dictators and maniacs have all been doing everything they can to increase the pressure each and every year in an attempt to keep the populations of the planet so pre-occupied that they don't have the time to completely analyze the evolving social disorder. They have also been, for many decades, tainting water and food supplies across the planet in a bid to create lethargy and memory loss.

In California, shortly after Arnold Schwarzenegger became governor, the government began again, in 2004, to fluoridate the water supply. Funny thing is, the only geographical location in the bay area that did not get fluoridated water was the city of Half Moon Bay. The reason claimed by the government was that the city just could not afford the additive. Except that Half Moon Bay is one of the riches cities in California.

The truth is that they did not want it, and fought to prevent it being added to the water supply. Moreover, it is possible that wealthy manipulators were a part of the decision to push for fluoridation and were prepared ahead of time.

Just so everybody understands: sodium fluoride is a poison, there is no exception, and it is quie dangerous. It was used in Nazi Germany during the Holocaust, and was added to the water supply for one reason only; because it produced the desired effect on the prisoners in the camps where it made them lethargic and nearly incapable of critical thinking and thus prevented any sustained aggression that may have allowed them to fight back with enough determination to overpower their captors.

It appears that Obama will not help the people in Libya. He knows damned well that this freedom that is taking root across the planet's oppressed and volatile regions is a clear and present threat to everything he believes in, or is a part of fomenting. It will ensure that the deceptive and unruly elitists of the world will soon have no ability to live in decadence as they do everything they can to convince the people that poverty is a precious commodity that they just can't do without.

Barack Obama is nothing but a pig in a prom dress...Period! And he is a lying buffoon who would just as soon bury this nation in a deep dark hole and shovel feces over it.