factbat.com

There is a huge disconnect from reality in Amerian society. Everywhere from presidential campaigns and debates, to the average person's conversations and dinner table chatter. And it is being touted and titillated by those in the media who should know better.

Regardless, the majority of this nation is ignoring that the words "illegal" and "immigration" cannot, contextually -- in any legitimate way -- exist in a literary series, or even parallel syntax.

These two words are antithetical to one another, and thus -- if used together -- must always be versed as an opposing aggregate or relative analogy of comparison and contrast.

The subject of "illegal immigration" cannot actually be engaged. For the simple fact that it does not even exist. There is the subject of "illegal aliens" and there is the subject of "immigration". And they are two entirely different issues, in utter opposition, one to the other.

These two words do not exist together as a legitimate term -- except in absurdity. Which, by all intents and purposes, renders the elections a comedy -- a frickin joke, if you will -- if they are to be further employed as a benchmark for candidacy, or heaven forbid, electability.

To reiterate: when presidential candidates, pundits and media personalities speak of the "illegal alien" issue currently facing this nation, they cannot use the term "immigration". Due to the unequivocal fact that "illegal aliens" are not "immigrants".

The law considers "illegal aliens" to be invaders, criminals, outlaws. And it rightly must.

Furthermore, there is absolutely nothing flawed in this nation's current immigration policies. This nation is perfectly hospitable to anyone who wishes to emigrate to this country. Providing they do so through legal means.

Regardless of what the nation decides must be done to curb this illegal activity. Or how those who have broken this nation's laws, and flouted its citizens' sovereignty, should be treated -- now that the issue has become a hot-button issue, the question is one of legality, not social reform, or special interest.

Furthermore, their self-imposed predicament cannot, in a significant way, be allowed to sway a presidential election.

The presidential elections have become -- for the last three cycles -- circuses of flea bitten vermin and emaciated mammoths amid the feindish fallacy of pitifully pragmatic paternalism, wimpering silly, sentimental sod from snivelly, panty-wasted politicians. Crying over spilled milk, rather than retrieving the dog-blamed musty, magnanimous mop from the dusty, Constitutional closet and putting it to work cleaning house -- something that has not been done for decades.

The fact is that the politicization of this issue has now reduced it to a trite affair of suspicion that has created a bastion of recalcitrant and seditious racists who are being pandered to and lauded simply for being a pompous and petty horde of veritable gang-bangers, banding together simply according to the color of their skin, spitting venom and vindictiveness at some of this nation's finest presidential candidates -- threatening to take sides as a racist group against the right, and support one of the nation's worst Democrats to have ever sat in the Oval Office. And simply because he promises them "special treatment".

What a very sad development for the country my family fought and died to inspire, risking -- and many times losing -- everything for nearly 1,100 years; and eventually founded ... for the INDIVIDUAL ONLY.