factbat.com

In the grand scheme of human relations there has been created -- through ignorant methodologies -- a parallax of uncommon disunion, wherein the misconstrued act of conflict creates an appearance of force which quickly devolves into reactive aggression. And the primary dysfunction effecting this outcome is a complete unwillingness to find common ground from which to view the object. Thereby skewing the objective.

In the nations of Israel and Syria, both leaders are involved in a war against their own people. The only difference between the two, is the demarcation of battle.

In Syria, the self appointed, authoritarian autocracy -- likened to the sterilized Jewish State -- is a veritable criminal entity that currently resides within the same national borders as its declared enemy. Populated by a veritable "extended family" of exclusionary sectarian bias.

However, the separation in both regions are still equally 'differing ethnicities of assumption'. Except that Israel, in its region, has seen fit to redraw the borders upon international lines, in order to completely exclude those they disagree with.

Furthermore, Israel appears to again be employing disinformation as a mlitary tool. They have been found committing acts of terrorism and assassination against Iran, and its scientists. And in repsonse, are obviously hiring and training malcontents and militarized extremists -- allegedly from Iran -- to attack their own operatives and diplomats, and then claim they are the victims.

However, it is a little late for this tactic to gain much respectable response, since Israel was reported to be the first to have engaged in acts of terrorism against Iran. To include Israel's claims, early last year, that they had created and activated dangerous software viruses within centrifuge control hardware  -- among other "cyber attacks" -- which effectively sabotaged some of Iran's nuclear program, causing deadly accidents and costly damage.

It is a rather remedial stunt that Israel is employing. Netanyahu is like a childish schoolyard bully, pickng his growing nose and precociously proclaiming "he hit me first!"

Both Benjamin Netanyahu and Bashar al Assad are men of equal criminal intent, in that they indefensibly appoint an identity of force through employment of denial.

The only reason the accusation of "foreign support for his enemies" has not become the battle cry of Netanyahu -- as it has for Assad, and did for Qaddafi -- is because Israel's civil strategy has been effectively mutated into a military one, through its insistence that they are fighting an aggressive foreign power. Regardless that it is one of their own creation, and wetted by Israel's mendacity and craftiness.

In reality, Israel, Iran, the West Bank, and so forth, exist as a basic, composite endeavor, merely separate lots of a common allotment. The same state of differing statements, gathered in a proximity that demands that they find a way to tolerate eachother. Or risk becoming victims of their own actions.

However, unlike the United States -- where the differences between ideologies and aspirations exist as permeable state lines of a common international border -- the Middle East borders are drawn with the express intent of fomenting lines of supremacy and reprisal.

This is why it is maniacal -- along with being Unconstitutional -- for the United States Government to act in any way which demonstrably supports either side of the current Middle Eastern debacle.

The truth is that the actions of all of these nations, Israel included, place them in a category of a clear threat to American sovereignty and national security.

Furthermore, this is the sole reason espionage and covert military reprisal have become a percieved, if not literal, threat inside of the United States. Not because the perpetrators are opposed to American ideology or sovereignty. But because this nation is not honoring its own system, or protecting its own borders. And thus is setting a very bad, and confusing, example for other nations to follow.

Of course Iran is increasing their nuclear potential. It has become a bargaining chip of developed nations. Having first began with the United States.

As for the insistence by Israel that Iran will attack them with a nuclear warhead, this is a rather inane accusation from a nation that secretly holds over 400 nuclear missiles in its military arsenal. And Iran, even if they do intend to enrich Uranium for weapons, would almost certainly only use this technology as a bargaining "threat", as do all other nations that claim this obliterating potential.

Furthermore, nuclear weapons are such an unstable and irrevocable method of aggression that their use is nothing short of an impetuous refusal to cooperate with a rival on any level, whatsoever. And the closer this world comes to having only one or two nations who possess this capability, the more likely it is that a nuclear attack will again occur.

Not to mention the fact that the United States Federal Government, with its Military, is the only entity to have ever employed such an unreasonable and destructive form of aggression. And in such a way that the primary vicitms of the flash were civilians.

What a shit-storm of necromantic, neo-conservatism these preposterously pragamatic pessimists have caused. Inspiring and training terrorists in their craft. Brainwashing desperate and depraved victims into believing that fratricide and philanthropy walk hand in hand. Dealing from the bottom of the deck, playing both sides to the middle.

Most often, foreigners whom may intend to attack the United States from within, appear to believe that they are engaging in military acts of battle against a warring faction. And who could blame them?

Even more damaging, to both the Middle East and the United States, is the existence of organized, political parties of foreign support operating within this nation's legislature. And the political lines they draw are identical to the geographical separations currently used as borders of military defense.

What is imperative at this juncture -- considering the many inept courses of action that have so ignorantly pushed the crisis to nearly imminent catastrophe -- is for the entire region to draft -- for lack of a better term -- an 'Inter-regional Constitution'. Wherein all parties agree to settle their differnces through diplomatic and judical engagements only.

Meaning that the national borders should -- at this point -- only be considered separations of debate. Thus allowing conflicts of belief and opinion to become catalyzing conversations of progress, in respect for the mutual aspirations of all parties.

Owing to the many cascading facets of exacerbated, sectarian divides that are causing inordinate levels of economic and social upheaval across the planet, the borders of the Middle East can no longer be considered ones of militarily secluded sovereignty.

Furthermore, any such agreement between these entities is not one for the United Nations to oversee. There are currently various member nations, such as Russia and China, that are an opposition force within the nations at issue; and for the express intent of engaging the United States in dislocated forms of economic and military aggression.

Regardless of who may be at fault in this boiling cauldron of bitter, international stew, none of the ingredients can -- at this late stage -- be separated from one another. And thus there must now be added a seasoning which can create a more palatable, and sustainable, cup from which to nourish this withering body of nihilistic nascency.

Those at the core of this international struggle have been, for decades, devolving into an extremely weakened state, rooted in secrecy and sedition. Their pithy, pest-infested trunks sprouting boughs of interlocking branches bearing low hanging fruit, where most every criminal power on Earth seeks shelter and sustenance; terrorists and tyrants drawn to its ripe and rotting bounty.

The dictators and autocrats must be removed from power. The nation of Syria, and its people -- as with all of the nations of the world -- deserve better than to be forced to exist at the pleasure of vultures like Bashar al Assad.

Truly, just one glance at the face and shoulders of this man's decrepit form, his eyes a menacing morbidity of loathing and lethargy, has burned upon my mind, his very soul. His brain is quite obviously a smattering of grey dust, blown by winds of wizen and warmongering, hailing a heart of blackness and beastiality. Like a feindish and freakish fornicator with swine and asses.

Bashar al Assad is one whom is only truly capable of acquiring that which can be handed to him. More proof that succession is never, nor has ever been, a legitimate form of leadership.

Take, for instance, the capricious and systemic infection the Bush's spread in America. The dynasty of the Georges was a reflection of a significantly parallel form of appointment.

When will collective humanity learn to employ the critical element of degrees of separation in their affairs?

Now, religious extremism has become the rallying cry of the denied, for want of a more inuring form of solidarity, and little esle. It is a totalitarian tool, lent to stave-off the exasperation and destitution that engulfs those who have suffered under obliterate forms of officiated oppression and organized crime.

But I digress.

None of the interceding nations can, any longer, claim innocence in the disparate matters of Middle East aggression. It is unequivocally the duty of those most responsible for the fractured byproduct of their corrosive, impregnating intercourse within the political structures of this arena, to abort the vicious and vengeful offspring they have conceived.

the Superpowers of this world, including the European Union, Great Britain, Russia, China and the United States, in concert with the Arab League, need to align under the common banner of 'human rights' and 'global preservation', and reconcile their efforts. Allowing the Middle East to return to its original state of sovereign, sectarian conflict that existed prior to being torn to peices by deceptive and invasive jackals. And craft a body of judicial power that can -- in the interests of that region alone -- equitably negotiate a settlement of the collective affairs of the Middle Eastern nations.