Repulsive Rosie O'Donnell, Handler Label 'Little People' "Scary Children"
Rosie O'Donnell is quoted as saying recently -- on her boring and moronic show -- that 'little people' "give her anxiety". And while it is certainly rather queer (pun intended) that O'Donnell would suffer from a phobia of 'little people' -- regardless of the fact that she is somewhat of a neurotic personality -- it is remarkable that she would use a talk show as a vehicle to publicly run them down.
Nonetheless, she has a right to be put-off by whomever she wishes.
However, it is most disconcerting that she would voice her silly sentiments on a nationally televised program that allegedly exists in a format expected to distance itself from such inane and impetuous ignorance.
Furthermore, one would think that a person of her -- however misplaced -- elevated station, would first seek to address any such personal malady, rather than irresponsibly present it as some sort of valid fear. And in so doing, take full responsibility for her dysfunction, instead of erratically unloading her baggage on an antire demographic of typically compassionate and tolerant people who certainly bear no responsibility whatsoever for Miss O'Donnell's unstable character.
Not to be outdone, however, Chelsea Handler appears to be competing with O'Donnell for a position in the gutter, proving her nascent lack of humor as she insidiously denigrates these people with salacious morbidity, stating "Having sex with a little person would be like child abuse".
Fortunately, the targets of Handler's and O'Donnell's demented stereotyping have every right to fire back with equal disregard. Since both the promiscuous baby killer, and the obese farm animal, have unequivocally chosen their depraved and physically nauseating course in life. And thus nearly every ounce of acrid, verbal attacks anyone can sling at them -- accordingly -- are entirely justified.
If O'Donnell truly intends to speak of "anxiety", then this author feels compelled to reply to her audacious dissemination with equally passionate, yet voluminously more valid vernacular, in exposing the fact that her physical appearance is such that the normal human mind naturally goes into near shock at the sight of a person who quite literally looks as though she may fall over and die of cardiac arrest at any moment. Or is so acidic and slovenly that her body is a veritable, toxic machine that sheds, sweats and defacates disease on a daily basis.
People such as O'Donnell are a depressing sight to behold, and force everyone around them to live face to face with a nerve-racking nihilism, bathed in a sordid and smutty stench of human mortality for want of a mere molecule of actual compunction that would inspire her to care at least enough to put down the bloody fork and chicken-chili, cheese smothered spoon in exchange for a glass of water and a bowl of vegetables.
Furthermore, Handler's intimated sexual proclivities summmarily place her in a nearly identical "avoid at all costs" category.
What is unfortunate, on the other hand, is that Handler and O'Donnell have absolutely no right to publicly broadcast the things they said, for the simple fact that the physical appearance of 'little people' is in no way a choice. And they certainly are nohwere near the threat to their community that O'Donnell and Handler incessantly choose to be.
Moreover, the majority of 'little people' surpass both of these ladies -- term used very loosely indeed -- in both character and craft, most any day of the week, and twice on Sunday.
To those she offended, I say "Laugh it off shorties, these two tall, tepid tales of tasteless and torpid tragedy aren't even worth your time."

Reader Comments