factbat.com

Regardless of who may wish to believe that they are permitted to waive their inalienable rights at their discretion, they are entirely incorrect in their assessment. And any action meant to do so, puts all citizens' rights at risk by debasing the nature of a system that operates to uphold, protect and defend them.

Waving inalienable rights in a free society sets a precedent of personal indemnity that cannot exist unopposed, and thus creates a conflict of interest -- within the social structure -- that is ripe for unbridaled corruption.

If, for any reason, a citizen of these United States enters into a vested business agreement with any other person, company, corporation, organization or government agency with the express intent of waving their inalienable right to privacy within a sector where privacy is an essential factor necessary to protect against criminality, then that person is engaging in an illegal act.

This is primarily due to the fact that the person attempting to waive their rights is quite literally setting a precedent of Unconstitutional activity in exchange for preferential treatment.

Which means that they are not only circumventing the entire nation's peoples' rights to equal opportunity under the law, they are also entering into a quid pro quo that places both parties' interests above and beyond all others. Thus enabling the benefactor to, in turn, engage in unlawful conduct against, not only the recipient, but also non-recipients through indefensible discrimination. Whereby, any such benefactor is the facilitator of a means to misconstrue the agreement, interpreting it as an active authority to abridge all person's rights. And the United States Constitution calls this activity -- likened to racketeering -- a crime.

I am writing this article because I appear to have placed myself in an extremely compromising position simply for recently publishing a piece exposing the criminality inherent to the system of "club card" consumerism. Which is an agreement that shoppers enter into with retailers, wherein the retailer requests personal information, and the permission to track and detail a customer's shopping habits in exchange for offering them specific discounts on various store items.

I exposed the fact that this is a membership of discriminatory privilege which is rife with criminality, and the very real factor of exclusionary strategy which places all persons' personal information in the hands of an insecure data base. Thereby enabling a system in which any person can be targeted by any number of private individuals whom -- regardless of qualifications to view sensitive information -- may become privy to personal information on persons whom they may intend to harm for their personal -- and thus legally protected -- views and or activities.

The fact is that all persons shopping at a store that engages in this type of membership are victims of criminality in that the store is then structured to track the personal purchasing habits of all consumers. This enables those whom are capable of viewing -- for whatever reason -- this personal data base the opportunity to attack those they oppose, with any number of intentionally tainted products that could either singly, or collectively, render persons incapacited, or even fatally eliminated.

However, very soon after the article posted -- exposing the fact that I do not use clubcards -- I began noticing people tailing me through various stores that I frequent. Such as Mother's Markets, Fresh and Easy Markets, and even Albertsons.

It was quite strange because, while they attemted to veil their activities, they were not very good at it. And their intentions appeared rather obviously covert.

I benignly evaded them at first, taking stock of their activities. But soon began to overtly show my lack of appreciation for their invasive behaviors. Openly chastizing and berating them under my breath when they would repeatedly pervade my proximity. And noting their reaction, as it confirmed my suspicions.

It was remarkable to witness their explicit demeanor as they reveled in their work; capriciously employing covert harassment of another individual that had never directly engaged them in any way whatsoever. To be clear, these people appear to have access to food supplies that could only become tainted at the source. Namely, the production facility where they are canned and packaged.

And this is a very worriesome development indeed. For, regardless of who may agree with this type of criminality because it is being perpetrated against those they do not like. The fact is that nobody is safe in this type of environment. And all would be wise to cease and desist such activities before it really gets out of hand.

I personally, have many effective means of mitigating the effects of their toxins. However, it appears that they are becoming more powerful, or more directed at causing a heart attack or other serious or fatal damage to the human body.

Remarkably, the people who are doing this are both organized and at the same time unstructured. Their tactics appear to be that of an online community of derelicts who's primary purpose is to operate outside of the law with the express intent of acting criminally towards those they dislike, in areas where the law does not apply. They obviously intend to aggress against persons for actions that are not illegal, but merely those actions which they, themselves, do not agree with.

Their primary goal appears to be the suppression of "Free Speech". And this means that this nation is now in grave danger for the existence of people who support the vigilante mentality that is growing quickly among the millions of cowards in this nation whom believe that everything that happens to them is somehody elses fault. Or that the saying "fight fire with fire" somehow equates to an indemnified, operational subliteral of "do as your enemies do"

However, this is the mentality of demagogues and morons. The truth is that "fighting fire with fire" specifically means to remove the element of criminality from the equation; thus removing the "fuel" which feeds the flame.

To engage in criminality against anyone is adding fuel to the flame, regardless of whether the target is a criminal, or merely a victim of somebody's criminal intent to exert, through force, their own personal views upon another.

Acts of agression and oppression are a very obtuse, ignorant and completely incorrect parameter of a doctrine that only the criminally minded are capable of indemnifying. And they run entirely contrary to every portion of this nation's founding documents.

However, it they are a mainstay mentality and the express intent of remuneration cultivated and professed by Israeli Jews. These people believe themselves to be victims of nearly everyone, and have draped themselves in martydome, propaganda and lies. Saturating this nation's silver screens with nearsighted and complacently violent movies aimed at brainwashing the public into a "kill or be killed" mentality. Screaming with every vile breath that those who oppose, or refuse to support, their actions are a threat to their survival.

Minorities and Jews are being incessently depicted in movies as being hated and attacked, even to this day. And the remarkable thing is that these movies are being produced by minorities and Jews.

However, the hateful and deleterious sentiments being depicted on the screen are not even occurring. Such as in the movie "As Good As It Gets", where Jack Nicholson plays a character that publicly, and loudly, berates two Jewish people in a restaurant so that he can get them to leave the table he wants to sit at. And the movie acts as if people just go around hating Jews as a race. When in reality, if one takes note of the many complaints people have against Israel, Jews are only being exposed for their brutality, criminality and human rights violations. As well as being the only truly -- and openly -- xenophobic nation on Earth.

Furthermore, most people are only upset about, and thus disagree with, their delusional doctrine of money worship, vengeance and supremacy -- which they teach their children from birth. And the fact that they extol themselves as the "chosen people of god", claiming -- through both word and deed -- that everyone eles on the planet is just chattle to be discarded and denied.

The only reason I am concerned about the Jewish state of affairs in this nation is because they have openly threatened me, stating that I will be killed for speaking out on my website against the brutality and hatred so often perpetrated by Jewish extremists.

Furthermore, prior to being informed of their hatred and criminal intent against me, they first pumped me for volumes of information concerning my consumption and shopping habits.

Needless to say that soon after that, I began noticing extremely marked, debilitating effects whenever I consumed products they knew me to regularly purchase. Thus I have had to alter, or supplement, various dietary proclivities...to say the least.

Not remarkably, these people have again resumed their attacks against me.

It will be imperative that this nation begin truly observing just exactly what is occurring around them, because these kind of people are just getting more bold, and growing in number.

To all of you Newtonians and Einsteinians out there: be assured that the parallel parameters of relative reckoning kindled by these kinds of actions will bear out a bonfire of unequal reaction that is many degrees removed from opposite.

Moreover, anyone capable of this kind of malicious mendacity reaps the effects of their bombastic existence on a daily basis. And rarely needs anyone to raise a finger to exact justice against them.

What is quite amusing -- to those with the congnizance to recognize it -- is that these people choose to suffer an almost hellish necromancy, never realizing that they dance a self-imposed waltz of misery their entire wretched life, wasting away in the cold and bony embrace of pain and torment, never tasting of anything even remotely akin to success.