factbat.com

Is Beyonce Knowles the voice of women in America, and of women everywhere? Are the women of the world truly as animus and gender biased as her latest video "Run The World (Girls)" implies?

If not, is Beyonce actually offering women anything new with her latest expression of an oppressed and undervalued subclass that has aspirations of one day becoming that which is oppressing and undervaluing others? Furthermore, why is she attacking all men? Are they the enemy of women everywhere as Beyonce appears to insinuate?

Beyonce is reported to have "wowed the audience" at the Billboard Music Awards with a profanity laced, male-bashing rendition of reprisal - most say is a copycat performance of another artist - that proposes men have run the world up until this point, and now the "girls" are taking over.

Read the lyrics to "Run The World (Girls)" song. This song's precocious pandering to an acrimonious demographic is ridiculous, and her video clearly shows that when she says "you'll do anything for me" she doesn't mean as a benevolent favor. It is clear she intends to promote the sexual barter system that is at the core of a whole host of corrupt practices involving everything from business and industry executives to profligate prelates and politicians

She is even being lauded by audiences full of people who appear to show no concern for the fact that Beyonce is shouting the words "we run this mutha f--ka" over and over again, as if there is some gender war going on that can be codified by which side can procure control; staining the very essence of human gender interaction, and demeaning the entire species with a completely erroneous depiction of dominance.

What is remarkable is that Beyonce is openly disparaging the billions of contributions by conscionable, honorable and courageous men throughout the history of civilization, and denying the many exemplary civic contributions from affluent married couples, both past and present.

She even appears to be hailed by some as progressive and captivating for fomenting a mentality that seeks to dissuade recognition of contributions that will be made by men in the future.

Beyonce's video, with its basic presentation of femininity as a bartering mechanism, shows her to essentially believe that a woman's physical features are little more than pliable assets that are to be traded for things other than equal reciprocation of a man's comparable, and often even more adroitly desirable, contributions to the bond through mutual attraction.

She also appears to believe that a woman's ability to garner compliance from men in exchange for the promise of sex is a show of dominance, and something novel in the social spectrum.

However, her salacious - and somewhat socially sacrilegious - sentiments are anything but definitions of dominance, nor are they novel. Her viewpoint has actually been proselytized by nearly every power hungry, egotistical and malevolently motivated, matriarchal money maven in history.

Truly, if women are so capable of running the world then why do the majority of them wear makeup that is tantamount to living behind a mask?

Why do so many women dress in clothes that are designed to "sex-up" the scenery when they go to work, if they are truly capable of running the world?

Furthermore, why do almost all women need to primp and posture for praise and pampering - ad infinitum? Why do they incessantly dress in a way that solicits the stares of men for the express intent of creating an atmosphere where their every assurance of legitimacy is based on the attention they can elicit from the opposite sex?

I'll tell you why. It is because men have taught them to do it. And it has generally been those men whom do not appreciate women as they naturally are that become the primary influence the vast majority of women will gravitate toward.

This is why much of what modern women have been taught to do is not as attractive to a real man. Truthfully, much of the styling's of women, with their high heels, excessively form fitting clothing, often ridiculous makeup, suffocating perfume and never ending accessorizing is the primary turn-off for this author.

I find much of what women currently believe they must do, say, and wear in order to be attractive or "classy" is utterly comical. And, no, dressing like a whore is not classy; I don't care what jerk-off little punk say's it is.

Furthermore, most of what women have been convinced are dominant behaviors, or displays of empowerment, are merely motivational mechanisms of indirectly submissive activities that are almost entirely reserved to things which are designed to satisfy men.

Regardless of the many obligatory marketing techniques which intend to create an identical type of mentality among the male population, the truth is that men do not generally react to the same need for acceptance and attention from women outside of a room full of old army buddies or conversations rich in locker room linguistics, spoken around the weekly poker table.

Yes, there are many distorted similarities of this solicitous behavior among men in contemporary society, but that is just all the more proof that women have had a significant impact on the world.

Women even dominate particular areas of modern society to the degree that their influence has produced millions of men who now suffer any number of identity crises which cause them to want to be a woman. Not just a female, in the literal and fundamental sense of their nurturing contribution to a family, and reciprocal roles in child bearing, raising and education. but in the "you go girl" realms of self-serving, flamboyantly sexual and gossipy gender bias where they are so often not held accountable for indiscretions that would otherwise put them in extremely compromising circumstances as a hetero male.

Let it be formally entered into the record that this author has - on this date 26 May 2011 - warned, and even predicted, that promoting an environment where females are expected to engage in actions of dominance that they are not capable of - at least in the proper literal sense - will place the society at large in a compromising and destabilizing position that cannot be easily corrected. And society as a whole will eventually pay a dear price (and is already beginning to) for engaging in the type of misguided and animus "knee jerk" severance that Beyonce has exhibited with her video.

Males are designed to be dominant. Their role is not one of control, as that would be the opposite of dominant. Instead their role is as a benevolent and austere facilitator, necessarily present to enable enlightenment by securing and promoting transparency through shows of support.

Conversely, there are many factors inherent within the primary design function parameters of females which do not afford them an express ability to functionally navigate this course of action, and their basic attributes are such that women are most satisfied in a submissive role.

Homosexuality displays this element in pervasive fashion, in that it proves just how gratifying a submissive role can be to a human being. Although men are predisposed to experience tremendous gratification from a dominant role in sexual relations, any human can learn to be gratified by the all encompassing nature of the submissive sexual role. Moreover, it has been the incessant adulteration of, and misconstrued definition of, the act of dominance that has led so many men to seek gratification in the less arduous position of submission.

For women, sexual gratification is only one small part of the conviviality they enjoy in a submissive role. However, it is the primary facilitator of gratification for gay men. The many other identity accessories they have learned to cling to in their bid for this preciously guarded commodity are just a way of reconciling with the fact that the species still requires men to play a dominant role, and thus the homosexual male typically finds it necessary to assume the most expressively submissive portions of female behavior, while avoiding the dominant ones.

However, what is most pertinent in the argument of who is to blame in the great scheme of things, as pertains the misadventures of human civilization, is that gender is only a small part of the overall illicit impresario of life.

That the societies of the world have become veritable cesspools of ignorant retaliation and sexually repressive desperation is not due to men or women running the world, or even the corporate catastrophe that has created swaths of anti-human sentiment among an elitist class of sanctimonious, pseudo suppliers of demand. But is actually the direct product of monotheistic recalcitrance perpetrated against the true divinity that is supposed to be directing the course of the human species.

The religious indoctrination that demands compliance with a centralized "supreme power" is the primary mechanism which has seen fit to flirt with the fates of mankind.

Religiosity has greatly defiled and defied the altruistic evolutionary spectrum which has existed as a finite set of sub cycles within the Universal cosmic realm since the birth of life on this planet.

It is the forces of duality - where opposites attract - which confine and define both genders within an associative atmosphere of equally coercive dominance and submission.

Furthermore, both genders are equally required to take dominant roles in specific areas. No one gender is a supreme authority. Meaning that no one gender can "rule the world". Nor is either gender capable of acting as the leader in all instances.

As for the corruption of society, women are just as bad as men, and they are the primary contributors to the depraved and reprehensible world of prostitution.

The fact is that women are also guilty of extremely destructive and nearsighted actions on a regular basis. And they are many times capable of astonishingly juvenile and vicious reprisal against those whom they feel have done them a disservice.

Furthermore, the competitive arena that women commonly exists within is host to some of the most degrading and demonic behaviors this author has ever witnessed. And while there is a clear competitiveness among men, it is in no way as brutal and narcissistic as that among women.

Regardless of the position that some people take, where they view women as only victims in the salacious business of prostitution, their roles are nearly always assumed by choice anywhere outside of the highly secretive, black market sex-slave trade.

Furthermore, few American women would have these roles reversed, and the majority of women in this nation are entirely satisfied with a system that enables them to capitalize on a natural human function, and exploit it as a means of generating everything from a lucrative all-cash-income that requires absolutely no investment at all, to gaining assets as a part of a quid pro quo with powerful and/or perverse men.

Far too many women are being cheered for their roles as prostitutes and sex objects, and the levels of social distortion that portend this whore mentality exists as a dominant facet of womanhood is primarily promulgated by men whom condone the steady stream of casual sex. And, of course, women who, quite obviously, are too stupid or simply too unethical, to realize their's is a clear role of expressly degrading submission that carries extreme risks and causes inordinate levels of inequitable consequences for the entire female population.

Beyonce's new video actually shows her submissiveness in expressly insipid form as she attempts to display the female orifice between her legs - that is merely a portal to the actual important female organs: her ovaries and womb, that require a medical professional to prove they are "all that" - as some means of beguiling viewers into accepting her turbid, and somewhat masculine, display of femininity.

Of course she intends to use her obvious low opinion of men as justification for denouncing them as inconsequential. Her mendacious, gender biased attack completely ignores the fact that women have contributed just as much to the running of this world as men have, and many times even to a greater degree than have the men.

As out of context as it may be, the fact is that if one believes in the story of the Garden of Eden, then allegedly it was women who played the primary role in dooming humanity to a life of pain and death. Eve was supposedly beguiled by the serpent to pick the forbidden fruit, eat of it, and then convince Adam to do the same.

Delilah was allegedly conscripted to convince Samson to cut his hair, thus relieving him of the one thing that gave him his strength.

Of course, one can argue that these are merely fables written by men whom desired to excoriate women and their role in society. However, they are hardly the basis for determining women's contributions to humanity at present.

Gloria Steinem, queen of the "women's movement" has admitted to working with the CIA to craft and promote Feminism in America. And she was fully aware of the CIA's primary goal to infiltrate and divide the American family, breaking it down into separate subversive structures that could be manipulated with various strategies aimed at creating conflicts of interest within the familial unit where none should, could or would have naturally existed.

Steinem's influential, and often deceptive, claims of inequality toward women were also an integral part of a broader scheme that exploded the tax load for the nation's working class. Persuading women to demand entrance into the work force allowed the IRS to effectively double the amount of income tax collected from low-wage workers each year.

This set the stage for extremely odious abuse and exploitation perpetrated against both women and children within the work place, due to the fact that both could no longer be properly protected by the male population, and has led to unmanageable discrimination and harassment throughout the entire employment spectrum in America.

This also promoted and environment of myopic sexual distinction during a time when both men and women were still inhospitably ignorant about their proper roles in society, and thus were relegated to blind compliance with government mandates that has caused inordinate levels of aggression and dysfunction both inside and outside of the average American household.

Unfortunately, the manipulations by government agencies and corporate bureaucracies further cultivated this ignorance and exacerbated its effects with increasingly severe gender bias that fomented a ''¹..."war of the sexes' that they are still using as an extremely lucrative, and destructively balkanizing, marketing tool that is further dividing the society and widening the gap between rich and poor.

Beyonce is just the latest, and one of the most dysfunctional, hard line hecklers to whore herself for the establishment in this fashion. And she should be seen for exactly what she is: a self-serving, bottom feeding opportunist who hasn't the compunction of a toilet seat, and therefore is perfectly happy to take people's money for selling them an indefensible ideology of indiscriminate hatred and self denial.

There is a technology called Homoskedastics which explains the nature of the manipulation that Beyonce is either assisting or merely an unwitting and obsequious victim of. This methodology is based on complex mathematical formulas that were created to assist in predicting the aggregate behavior of society based on many specific but unpredictable contributions.

This enabled federal agencies to determine to what degree they would need to influence the many various sectors of the society in America in order to effect predictable behaviors among the vast majority. The sectors are broken down in to sub-sectors, or groups, and one of these is the family unit.

Federal agencies even created dot graphs which charted the effects of thousands of various mechanisms that were employed. Such as broad based propaganda that elicited various forms of rebellion in children and teens toward authority figures in general.

But Beyonce is not the only woman to use her wiles to hypnotize the public. There are plenty of feminine examples of extroversion that have become a significant part of the widening web of control were the primary weapon of wizen craft is contrived controversy spread among the society, and based on any number of divisive ethos; whether they be race, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or whatever, so long as it contains some element of contrition capable of riling the masses.

There are women like Raymone Bain, a political sycophant and black racist who worked as publicist for the creator of the audacious "Inconvenient Truth" ''¹..."crockumentary' - and all-around social scoundrel - Al Gore during some of his presidential campaigns, and was the deceptive designer of the image concocted for Michael Jackson which was intended to divert attention from his indiscretions after he began losing support during his child molestation cases.

She has, for over three decades, employed her talent of ''¹..."not being born with a conscience' as a marketable and ethically malleable product that she could offer to troubled, high profile personalities in return for a tidy paycheck. She even worked for of the Office of Budget and Management (OMB) at one point.

However, there have been many great and pivotal contributions by courageous women throughout history. Such as Phyllis Schlafly, author of "A Choice Not An Echo". She was paramount in exposing much of the ins-and-outs of political racketeering, and the power brokers that propagandize and manipulate a vast majority of the voters in America by setting the stage for "king makers" who have controlled elections in America for many decades. ("A Choice Not An Echo" 1968)

The problem is that the millions of pieces of evidence which conclusively prove the government's many scurrilous and fractal invasions of peoples' every day lives, meddling in affairs they have no authority to be toying with, are such that it will take a massive amount of effort and time to compile and disseminate this for display. Maybe in a future, explicit expose that could easily require some 20 or 30 pages to fully extrude.

However, it will be imperative that the entire nation soon come to terms with the nature of the manipulation because it is only increasing, and there are many core facilitations that have already been set in place and will be exponentially effective in the new realms of technology where most every corporation in America is daily spying on and waging emotional war on their consumers in the interest of profit.