factbat.com

Recently, a Washington D.C. based website, bltwy.com, published an article (or response) denigrating, and besmirching, remarks made by Justin Beiber concerning abortion.

The website, which appears to be a conglomeration of political party worshippers and government action committees who's primary goal is to set the world of government apart from that of the people, basically offers little more than a collage of political persona's. It is a rather creepy site of veritable sedition that does not even respect visitors enough to be clear about its name. One is simply left to assume that BLTWY is a vowel-raped facsimile of the term "inside the beltway", or simply "beltway".

What is remarkable, is the level of disdain that it has for the inalienable right of "free speech". In response to a recent interview Justin Beiber gave to Rolling Stone Magazine - where he opines on subjects like Korea and abortion - the site clearly tells Beiber to shut his mouth on the subject of abortion, simply because the creators, and/or facilitators, of the site do not agree with his - let's face it - very candid and honest sentiment that it is "like killing a baby".

The site's article states: "You are simply adorable when talking about girls and music, but talking politics with Rolling Stone is not a wise move." This is clearly reminiscent of the act of denying women the right to vote in this nation. Government obviously appears to believe that Justin Beiber is nothing more than a "pretty face" that should only speak when he is told what to say.

This is one of the most scurrilous and underhanded - albeit rather brazen - examples of discouraging open and honest communication, that I have seen in years. Does BLTWY truly believe that they have the right to tell Beiber what, or what not, to say? Just who the hell do they think they are?

I commend Beiber for having the courage to speak his mind with honesty and decorum. He did his best to answer a query as to his feelings on a very important matter. And he in no way attempted to make a political issue of it as the BLTWY has. BLTWY has clearly shown its disreputable level of preposterous prerogative to be anything but convergent with the United States Constitution, and should likewise apologize for excoriating the young singer for nothing more than his honesty.

The site goes on to say "We know you're just a 16 year old Canadian, but that's all the more reason you shouldn't be pontificating about American politics, abortion and rape." Which has nothing to do with his right to speak his mind, especially since he was not pronouncing himself an authority on the matter.

Furthermore, let me get this straight. The subject of abortion is considered to be American Politics? Well, I vehemently disagree. This subject matter has certainly beeen politicized, however, it has only been so under the heading of government financing. This bloated government currently has its strangling tentacles in many areas of common social interaction that it has absolutely no business entering into. Neither does it have any business financing its will across this nation with American tax dollars.

The daily sociological governance of the nation is to be handled in every respect by the various states, and thereby ensure the collective bargaining ability of the entire nation, not that of one powerful entity or another.

The only thing Justin Beiber said was "I really don't believe in abortion, it's like killing a baby." And when asked about rape cases by Rolling Stone, he responded "Um, well, I think that's really sad, but everything happens for a reason. I don't know how that would be a reason. I guess I haven't been in that position, so I wouldn't be able to judge that." And this is an entirely honorable and fortuitous statement to be certain.

The truth is that abortion is most certainly the act of killing a baby. So, just what is the problem with saying so? Does this truth pose a problem to political parties? Actually when one really thinks about it, the fact is that this form of honesty - which naturally exfoliates the underlying crises most politicians are too inept to even understand, let alone posit effective measures to address - most certainly does create many problems for the true pontificators that play the fields of national politics. It appears bltwy.com could use a dictionary so that they can learn just what "pontificating" means. Because Beiber was not in any way guilty of the accusation so ignorantly thrust at him by these moronic sophists.

There are entire swaths of politics in America that are attended daily by people who do not care one bit about the governance of the nation, but rather are simply focused on getting elected, and by any means possible. Even if that means siding with those who would want criminal acts to remain a dislocated and disheveled realm of discord where even the most benign and well-meaning voice of reason can be attacked and silenced by cries of foul play.

Simply the fact that this nation must eventually find a way to end the abhorrent act of aborting a fetus, does not somehow fix a "victim" tag to the backs of all women. Understanding this reality simply allows the conversation to ensue, which would bring to bear the conflagrating act of rape, which must certainly be seen as the crime against humanity that it is.

Rape is one of the most heinous, and as well insubordinate, actions any human can ever involve their self in. So many men in this world are never taught their true role in society. Neither are women instructed on their supreme, and inalienable, authority to be the gender which must initiate sexual intercourse with the man.

For any man to rape a woman is a clear act of insubordination, and the penalties of this type of Universal non-compliance must be severe. Not tainted and shamed by punishment, but literally saturated with vilification, education, rehabilitation, and recompense (more than mere restitution).

The more this nation enables the excoriating and educating realms of criminal investigation to foster within the political process analytical actions that reflect and refract within the society, the more progress is attained toward a more honorable and sustainable future for the entire nation.

Logical, and thereby moral, action must be the primary concern when addressing the realm of electoral function in this nation's democratic process, rather than merely seeking a majority rule mentality under the guise of representation. This nation's governance must be that which reflects the primary inalienable tenets of the United States Constitution, nothing more, nothing less.

The founding documents of this nation are such that they can prevent even the most incrementally pervasive criminality by merely being followed diligently.

Furthermore, the protests in Wisconsin, which are primarily populated by people currently employed by the government, are in defiance to the supreme law of this land.

The fact that government has so long refused to uphold, protect and defend this nation's constitution is what has pushed the acts of implementing change, transparency, conservancy and accountability into the region of retaliation. These acts are never meant to decrease resources, or deny access. However, the fact that this nation has allowed its government to literally refuse any engagement of change is the primary detractor that is exacerbating the economic crises so many are feeling pinch their lifestyle.

The response to the deficit management that has this nation reeling from a veritable self-inflicted wound is not reputable in any way when administered under pain of threat or discord. The Governor in Wisconsin is obviously responding courageously to a national disparity that has given public unions collective bargaining rights that are entirely unconstitutional.

The fact that government employees at the state level are allowed to push for pay that does not reflect, and typically exceeds, the national standard, is destroying this nation by allowing the government to operate above the people - and the markets - that it is there to serve. This is also a clear act of insubordination, bordering on sedition.

Bravo! to the governor of Wisconsin for taking the hard road and making the tough, unpopular decision to follow the constitution with responsible measures that will pay off in the long run; and as well to Justin Beiber for showing the courage to tell the truth.

Reference:

"When Celebs Talk Politics Bad Things Happen." @ bltwy.com; http://bltwy.msnbc.msn.com/politics/when-celebs-talk-politics-bad-things-happen-925.gallery?GT1=43001