factbat.com

Once again, after being discriminated against simply for refusing to divulge personal information to a simpleton, slacker cashier in some deprecatingly departmentalized, dead-beat depot packed with overpriced products and undervalued customers, the gloves came off and the vernacular degraded nearly to the guttural depths that the store’s management operates far beneath on a regular basis.

More and more often consumers are being accosted at the checkout counter by cashiers who are more than willing to accept their thirty pieces of silver for denigrating anyone who may not be in possession of the store’s customized card of crap that intends to infer upon only specified persons some inclination that they are better than everyone else, and thus are entitled to save a few wretchedly depreciating pennies on their inflated purchase.

However, not being willing to merely accept the bait and switch that occurs once the register ignores the sale price of the item because it turns out that it was only being offered to alleged “preferred customers”, who are ignorant enough to bend over and splay themselves for some ridiculous plastic placard - regardless that there was not even any fine print to barely inform the purchaser of this deleterious dissemination - this author decided to question the management as to just why the store demands that customers be loyal to the supplier, rather than the store proving its loyalty to the people by providing a decent value to all of the customers who are spending their hard-earned cash?

To which a hook-nosed, dog-faced, despicable corporate whore, most closely resembling a troll who eats fried babies for dinner replied - in an extremely condescending and capriciously complacent manner, no less - “you have the choice to shop elsewhere.” This, in response to a customer who just last night purchased a $150 bottle of Cognac for a friend for Christmas.

However, while it may appear that she is correct in her boorish assessment of the matter, the fact is that consumers, in many instances, have absolutely no other choices because more and more businesses are playing the identical, and reprehensibly invasive, discriminatory game with everyone’s personal information.

Typically, consumers are left with a dearth of options when attempting to purchase common products, that is if they are not willing to undergo an inquisition into their personal lives, preferences and purchasing habits.

Not to mention the fact that the vast majority - if not all - of those who are demanding this extremely sensitive information are not in any way qualified to receive it. And certainly do not operate within any official capacity that would require them to be held accountable should they allow the information to become compromised - as almost certainly happens often.

The very real truth is that the club card fiasco is entirely illegal, because no business, company or corporation has any right to ever demand anyone’s personal information. Their requests are a clear violation of people’s inalienable rights, to both privacy, and security in their person and effects.

That companies are regularly coercing consumers into divulging personal information does not in any way remove the criminal element from the equation. Simply the fact that a person does not recognize the extremely inequitable quid pro quo that is occurring, does not absolve the perpetrator of accountability for their overt perfidy and deception.

The actions of these companies are no less criminal than those of the Enron executives who ripped off peoples’ poor old, frail grandmothers, leaving them to freeze in the dark. Or Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac prankster banksters who almost single handedly drove millions from their homes while infecting the entire global financial market with emaciating - alleged AAA - paper that was worth less than junk.

There is also an inordinate level of discrimination and conflict of interest present, to the degree that it will eventually become regularly injurious to the majority of the population.

This type of relationship being fomented between companies and the average consumer is specifically designed to attack the purchaser’s natural proclivity to “choose” by introducing a sterile and hermetical element where the need for exceptional objectivity and neutrality is the most critical element in preserving the fidelity of commerce, and the many products which course along its economic causeways.

The fact is that the more consumers allow themselves to be tracked and targeted, the less companies will be required to offer high quality, diverse products in order to stay competitive. This type of homogeneity will eventually devolve into a lopsided moiety that will greatly decrease both safety and quality in the items being offered.

If a store has the ability to track every single purchase of its customers, the products being offered will only be those that consumers have become accustomed to. Which means that the innovative element which is created by competition, and which is largely responsible for the many healthier and more sustainable products introduced over the last 100 years, will not be engaged as readily, to an eventual abandonment altogether.

This is primarily due to the capitalist nature of the markets which forces farms and factories to seek ways to increase quality rather than quantity.

This also enables a simpleton, derelict cashier the opportunity to gain utter control over consumers’ health and welfare. And with the very real up-tic in intemperate reprobates who daily believe themselves to have been slighted, disrespected or offended by everything from the way a person dresses to the level of their income, this places a veritable wand of fate in the hands of what could easily be nothing more than a complete degenerate, simply because they work as a cashier for the stores where their chosen enemies shop.

Got a backroom stock boy who’s hating on that highfalutin hotty who comes in and buys egg salad every Thursday at noon, simply because she won’t give him the time of day? Why, no problem, a little fecal matter or diseased saliva in it will be just the thing to satisfy his deranged and filthy mind. And why does he know when and where to attack? Simply because her name is always attached to the purchase, and she is constantly being tracked.

Got a group of homosexuals working at various locations of the same store? Better not be an outspoken opponent of deviance and perverse behavior in society because the majority those homosexuals will believe themselves to be victims, and are perfectly positioned to taint the precise products that their unwitting target is known to purchase.

Of course, there is always the very real, and most destructive, perpetrators still hiding in the shadows - the actual corporations which are privy to entire communities of consumers’ personal preferences, proclivities and political affiliations. Need to release a specific disease or toxin into a specific area at a precise and predetermined time, and in specific amounts? Well, hopefully readers are beginning to get the picture, because the very real truth is that there is much evidence to suggest that this type of sinister selectivity is already occurring on a broad scale.

This author has, himself, already amassed a bevy of extremely compelling evidence which almost conclusively proves suppliers and vendors alike to be intentionally engaging in viciously criminal discrimination against consumers by targeting them with tainted products.

Why does it appear to be occurring unchecked? Because those who are perpetrating this criminality were never qualified, nor legally allowed, to handle sensitive information, and thus can never be held accountable if, and when, they misuse it.