factbat.com

In the debate over whether or not a Muslim mosque should be erected at the site currently known as “ground zero”, where over 3000 people met an untimely demise entirely due to uniquely engineered events which have been defined by government reports as a veritable trifecta of naturally occurring phenomena, the only legitimate arguments are those which are based entirely on irrefutable facts sustained by conclusive physical evidence.

There is far too much confusion being injected into the controversy by the vast majority of this nation’s citizens who are attempting to justify their position without first demanding of themselves, and others, a complete and precise knowledge of exactly who, what, where, when, how and why the events of September 11, 2001 occurred.

While it is certainly obvious that the majority of Americans do not possess any first-hand knowledge of the conversations that created the strategic structure of -- let’s face it, extremely transparent in their audacity -- the events which transpired on 9/11, there is a litany of unquestionable physical evidence available to any person who has the courage to look at it objectively.

The undeniable fact is that there is no evidence whatsoever which shows conclusive proof that the 9/11 events where the result of any strategy Khalid Sheik Mohammad, the alleged mastermind, and his reported band of 19 Muslim extremists, would or could have devised, or were even capable of. Moreover, there is a huge reservoir of extremely practical, easily discernable, and historically relevant, physical and circumstantial evidence which demands a conclusion to the contrary.

The complete and utter systemic demolition of the three buildings that fell to the surface of the planet at free-fall speed on that tragic day has yet to be openly discussed, and until a transparent and impartial debate has been fully concluded according to empirical scientific analysis and comparative research, the conversation concerning the proposed New York mosque cannot even begin.

Regardless of who or what is believed to have caused the many overtly extraordinary and diverse incidents of 9/11, the fact is that the official reports which claim that small kerosene fires were responsible for the complete systematic collapse of three steel and concrete structures, designed specifically with redundant supports that do not in any way contain the required physical composition necessary to cooperate with such precise timing, only serve to contribute to any expected mystery surrounding the entirety of them.

Considering the fact that the investigation of the “what” has not even been clearly identified, and the “where” has thus been allowed to essentially shift behind the veil, the “who, when, how and why” cannot possibly be determined with any degree of certainty whatsoever.

There has never been, nor will there ever be, any discovery of proof by a system which diverts from the set structural parameters of empirical research and the inherent proof-logic equation to proof-logic solution formulae it is bound to.

The debate between any religious doctrine over another must be confined to the fanatical realm that all monotheistic religions cling to, and therefore remain utterly divest of, and compliant with, the unforgiving power of this Universe.

Benevolence is merely a pleasant interpretation of the cold hard reality that must incessently be forced to prove to all humanity that the trajectory of ignorance and insubordination that created such concepts as "love", "hope", "belief" and "faith" are nothing more than recepticles for feelings that present a certain refusal to understand and practice respect.