factbat.com

The Real Truth About Sex and Gender Roles

By: Dane Wilson

12 July, 2010, 6:13 pm

factbat.com

The information revealed in this article is unequivocal fact, and the gender roles inherent to human social behavior are bound to a finite set of rules which command each of the two genders to exude both dominant and subservient aspects of authoritative behavior.

Understanding the true meaning of authority is paramount to this analysis, and the fact that, for any authority to exist there must be both an author and an authorizer. Any entirely homogeneous social action is of itself perverse and dictatorial.

When examining the nature of human sexual relations and their primary function, one cannot deny that a woman does not truly have the right to choose the abortion of a fetus. However, the indemnifying fact is that she is born with the inalienable right to choose whether or not to become pregnant, if for no other reason than the simple fact that the female gender of the human species is the only one endowed with the inherent authority to initiate sexual contact with the male.

As it is likely that the majority of society either may not agree with this eternal truth, or merely is unaware of its inherent manifestation within the Universal design function parameters of human beings, I will explain.

First let me take a moment to make this statement: It is imperative to human survival that today’s peoples begin to disabuse themselves of the erroneous ideologies which have become common place and which are essentially allowed to claim supremacy over the human social mind. And in contrast seek to educate themselves and their successors logically as to just what are the true design function parameters inherent to all humans. Else wise, the ideologically induced confusion that has produced the current evolutionary cycle of role-reversal among the various populations will continue to manifest increasing disparities that are both unsustainable and cataclysmic.

To begin with, people must understand the proper roles inherent to each gender, and thus it is necessary to correctly define their specific and autonomous physical functions.

What is extremely significant within the context of acceptable precursors to human sexual intercourse is the fact that the woman does not possess the authority to say “yes”, or “no”, neither does the man possess the right in any way whatever to request sexual contact in the first place.

In fact, in human relations it is the female who retains the primary authority to initiate all sexual contact between the genders.

In light of the fact that the woman is not physically capable of preventing sexual intercourse -- that is, if a man of means to force her into it is determined to overstep her authority in the matter -- the inherent dominant (yes I said DOMINANT) authority retained by the female, in this context, is of an indispensable and undeniable nature.

To be clear, the raping of a female by a male is unequivocally a distinct and deliberate act of blatant insubordination. For the males of this species to have, for so many centuries, ignored or denied this fact is astronomically unconscionable, and has proven to be a perilous position as regards a nearly countless number of perverse mechanisms which have evolved as a result.

Furthermore, paramount to clearly understanding the inherent role of the female, including her specific authority in sexual relations with the male, is disseminating the inherent role of the man.

The fact is that the male is the only one who can authorize the act of sex because he is the only one of the two who is physically capable of saying “no”. The female is allowed to author, or initiate, the sexual encounter. However, the male takes full responsibility for its authorization.

This inherent role play is a divine and supremely crafted mechanism which guarantee’s both fidelity and posterity within the species. This is one reason why the males of the species inherently exude a basic austerity in a majority of their behaviors.

To reiterate, the role reversals that have ensued due to a majority of ignorance to these aforementioned facts has manifest disparities in many indirect areas of behavior. Until humans learn how to properly define and engage the act of sexual intercourse, nearly every other endeavor engaged by humans will be adversely affected.

What is remarkable is the fact that every monotheistic doctrine on the planet displays little, or no, evidence to show that they acknowledge these primary tenets of human behavior. For example, the people of Muslim faith have ignored these tenets to a degree that they now engage in some of the most inhospitable and brutal extremes known to man. In the average Middle Eastern society where the people pattern their behaviors according to the Koran the woman bears the entire brunt of the responsibility to authorize the sexual act, regardless of the fact that she is not inherently capable, and thus not allowed, to do so.

It must be clearly understood that the entire responsibility for affirming or denying sexual intercourse -- to a woman, who is inherently endowed with the authority and inalienable right to request it -- is placed inexplicably in the lap of the male (pun intended). This primary mechanism of human sexual behavior is in no way reversible, nor can the male’s responsibility ever be legitimately imposed upon the female; any attempt to do so is a clear violation of natural law.

The Koran has misled an entire continent into believing that the male is the one endowed with the sole authority to initiate the act of sexual intercourse, regardless, and in complete defiance, of the fact that the male has no right to do so.

This level of insubordination, however unwittingly or intemperately engaged, has created an insensible atmosphere of frustration and denial that has clearly cultivated a great many of the animosities and tensions now engulfing the majority of Middle Eastern nations.

What is most remarkable about this check and balance of human design function is the fact that if this area of natural law were being complied with, then the only abortions that would ever occur would be those where the life of either the mother or baby were in imminent danger should the pregnancy or birth continue.

In this logical realm of compliance, rape or molestation would be largely negligible because there would exist a more hospitable environment of accountability among the genders, and the current role reversals and gender biases would be essentially non-existent.

Women would be more free to feel comfortable in their role as a woman. They would feel safer in their role as the sensuous beings they are. They would not be expected to both expose and protect themselves in what has become an illogical world of “no” means “yes”.

If human beings had realized from the beginning that it is the woman’s duty to make the first move, and the man’s responsibility to be accountable for the transpiration of events which then accrued as a result, then there would be no “pimp mentality”. There would be no “prostitutes”. There would be no men molesting little girls. There would be no homosexuals. There would not be a great many of the abuses perpetrated against both males and females now pervading this society.

If the men in this world were held supremely accountable for their logical role in regulating the proliferation of sexual relations throughout society, as they should be, then there would not be the excessive and pernicious pursuit of females which is prevalent today.

Essentially because there would be very few acceptable excuses for aberrant behaviors, and punishments or reprisals for misbehavior would be expressly more severe.

There would possibly be a bit more gunplay in the streets at high noon, and a lot more intemperate adolescent males getting smacked around by angry elders, but there would exist a much more tolerable social order than there is today.