factbat.com

Hollywood’s twisted relationships with the U.S. government and national security agencies have exposed Uncle Sam to be little more than an incestuously depraved relative to an extremely dysfunctional marriage with America’s deadbeat father’s of industry.

It has been tentatively hoped for nearly an entire century, by various facets of informed, and thus alienated and discredited, defectors, that at the very worst the “dissentertainment” industry may focus most of its despicable propensities outward and merely molest the neighbor with its penetrating propaganda.

However, as bad as this somewhat indefensibly complacent position could appear to be, it has become increasingly apparent that any chance of simply suffering under international blame for facilitating the birth of this lesser evil ended with the adoption of the Statist Twins, when America became exposed as the primary target of the most treacherous betrayal of all.

Hollywood is helping to produce the block buster to end all blocks as this society slowly becomes fractured from within by the incessant decay festering in the distended belly of a nation malnourished on a diet of misinformation.

“Unthinkable”, one of the latest, and most destructively perverse productions to come out of state- controlled Hollywood, star’s Samuel L. Jackson who, in the movie, makes every attempt to legitimize and condone human torture and the murder of innocent people, including children, by excessively, and repeatedly, depicting these atrocities as necessary evils that will save America.

Furthermore, given the inordinate levels of Jewish influence in and on the entertainment industry, and this movie’s remarkably “fan-spastic” glamorization of some of Israel’s most indefensibly brutal state policies, makes it nearly impossible, if not utterly so, to ignore the likely contributors who conceived this disingenuous and irascible Hollywood hate-child.

Mark my words, there is a new legal precedent coming to America which will hold these predators liable, and prove beyond reasonable doubt that this level of premeditated social deception, perpetrated by facilitators who hide behind deformed disguises, draped with cheap costume necklaces dangling a degraded and tarnished jewel of free speech, is a perversion that in no way represents the letter or intent of the U.S. constitution’s first amendment.

One of the greatest rights of this nation’s peoples is that which enables one to hold legally accountable any person or entity which under the color of law deprives people of their civil human rights. Of significance is the capability of this litigious society to protect itself from even those who would abridge peoples’ inalienable rights protected under the Constitution by attempting to shield themselves with a perverted interpretation of it.

In America, the inalienable right of all citizens to petition for legal redress of grievance has facilitated the growth of what will always be the greatest nation on Earth, because it created within it an elemental sovereign resource that will eventually disabuse this nation of the systemic disease of prohibition, which is inherently destructive to all societies.

Albeit, once the people “as a whole” truly take stock of their mandatory duty to examine, dissect and disseminate each and every law in this nation, and thereby live in defense of one’s self, and protect the fidelity of the courts from the many mendacious sophists who currently pretend to defend the interests of the citizens under the guise of a professional legal conduct which is predominantly unbecoming outside the shadowy confines of a judicial system they have incessantly sought to drape with a veil of ambiguity.

What is significant to the argument for litigation is the fact that informed consent, or the lack thereof, is a definitive factor which determines the boundaries of criminally exploitative endeavors.

For example, it protects children from those who would argue that child pornography is shielded by freedom of speech. Basically because the child cannot give informed consent and therefore the mere filming of an underage person in a provocative, revealing, or sexually suggestive manner is a crime. Furthermore, in the interest of preventing or discouraging obscene and reprehensible acts of this nature, any content that is sold for this express purpose is also prohibited.

While there are certainly more effective alternatives to prohibition, in this context the current, less than sufficient, method of curtailing this unconscionable and sadistic pornographic marketing will have to do. However, only because I intend to introduce, implement, and witness the results of, a demonstrably superior equation which will render it, and its inherent loopholes, obsolete.

On a side note, I considered naming this article “America de booty full” since a great many of the corrosive mechanisms created by the movie industry are about as entertaining as fatal sodomy. I was going to say “fetal sodomy”, however, in considering the fact that there are far too many people who have been degraded to the point that they would actually enjoy watching such “womb porn”, I changed my mind.

Of course the primary question is just who, or what, Hollywood intends to entertain.