factbat.com

When analyzing just the basic parameters of the relationship between Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva it is apparent that Mel was much less the lone agitator he is being made out to be. There is always two sides to every story, and as far as the narrative being currently splashed across the main stream media concerning their relationship, it is obvious there is a dearth of actual truth being told about just what part Oksana played in all of this.

What is significant is asking just what kind of person would covertly record their mate in a compromising moment, especially if they are witnessing them act in an aggressive or confrontational manner? It would certainly require a significant amount of dislocation, indifference and premeditation simply to engage in the deception itself. However, the likelihood that one may need to first aggravate some opportune occasion or event to a degree that it would produce a response worthy of recording, exposes the fact that this form of behavior first requires a relevant propensity for betrayal.

What must it have been like to daily live with a woman to whom deception comes so easily.

What is remarkable is that I have been several times tormented and abused, both physically and emotionally, by some tremendously insidious women, but never even considered recording their destructive behaviors. I was typically too busy attempting to understand them or find a way to help them.

One would assume that any person who truly cares about another individual would first be concerned about addressing whatever complaints or concerns their mate had, rather than recording their obvious angst.

Not to mention the fact that there is every reason to question whether Oksana did not simply seek to create a perceived disparity by aggravating Mel, who is obviously a deeply passionate and volatile intellectual.

With all due respect, and in no way disparaging of him, Mel appears to be a person who is an easy target for a woman who would seek to do him harm by cultivating a close relationship with him and then employing passive-aggressive behaviors meant to elicit a bevy of animus reactions from him.

Maybe she has been seeking a “gold digger’s” reward but was prevented it in some manner, and thus has been devising some way to embarrass the man in the public eye, and therefore circumvent the legal processes of a separation on amicable terms, in order to receive a huge pay-off.

As for Mel’s irascible rants, can any truly honorable person on this planet actually disparage Mel for expecting that his girlfriend display a wholesome image and show a little respect for him and his concerns by complying with requests that she not dress excessively provocative in public?

While I never condone any form of violence outside of self-defense -- and then I hold the aggressor accountable for excessive force of an indefensible nature -- I do agree that he appears to have had a legitimate beef as regards the possibility that she was acting inappropriately. But of course I would never approve of Mel’s behavior if he physically assaulted Oksana.

However, the allegations that Mel knocked her tooth out do not appear to be legitimate. For anyone who has had a tooth knocked out, or known somebody who has, it is not just some simple everyday injury. It typically is the kind of injury where the tooth actually breaks off and requires that the remaining portions be extracted. It also is not an easy thing to accomplish, and the visible bruising would be extremely obvious, as well as a likely laceration of the face. This would have raised concerns at the very least, and there would have been somebody who at least made an inquiry as to her welfare.

At any rate, I do not necessarily fault Mel Gibson for cussing out Oksana, or calling her names. The likelihood is that she did very little to avoid angering him. I have rarely met a woman who was telling the truth when she claimed her mate abused her without reason.

Far too many women in today’s society would rather dress provocatively in order to get attention from all men, than take the moral high ground and admit that this type of behavior is extremely juvenile and degrading, and take a conservative approach which would require them to find more constructive ways to get noticed.

Regardless of just who may approve of the oversexed and depraved social environment a great majority of women are daily contributing to, the fact is that the perversions that are growing in this “pimp” atmosphere are not in any way compliant with this species’ design functions, nor can it tolerate it indefinitely.

Far too many males in this nation (note I did not say “men”) are all too happy to see the female population incessantly denigrate themselves with salacious conviviality where the average schmuck has the opportunity to engage in an indiscriminate sexual encounter with a caliber of female who should otherwise be reserved only to those men who display a level of character worthy of her genetic disposition.

So it is rare to find somebody like Mel Gibson who will actually have the guts to expose the tremendous anguish so many “real men” feel, almost constantly in a nation where the majority of the most beautiful women have been perverted to the point that they display an almost intolerable “prostitute” image.

At times it appears these women suffer from an excessive entitlement mentality, however, they do not typically want some ethical benefit that otherwise may be denied them. But rather, just expect to be allowed to sell their body without any accountability for the disparities and disloyalties this generates. It is astonishing how many women cry and moan about how they are mistreated or cheated on all the while reciprocating the behavior.

I, for one, have countless times been approached by friends’, acquaintances’ and family members’ girlfriends who attempted to seduce me. I, for a great many years suffered from trust issues with women simply because of the many despicable females who showed utter contempt for their loving, caring, trusting boyfriends when attempting to seduce me behind their backs.

I never did return the advances, and on the contrary would generally avoid contact with the female after such an encounter. And I have at times been placed in dangerous situations for doing so. Especially if I told the female that “I’m just not your type” or “who do you think I care about more, you or my friend?”

Unfortunately, most males in this nation would never dream of calling a female on her disloyalty. In fact, those males -- who are typically only interested in chasing skirts -- realized long ago that it is essentially impossible for them to get any of the “puntang” from a female whom they have voiced disapproval of, and therefore, they are more apt to contribute to the growing levels of contemptuous behavior by females.

What is imperative, however, is for the men in this nation to start holding the “little boys” accountable for their dishonor and perfidy. Any real man realizes how critical it is for him to behave with decorum and benevolent dominance when it comes to engaging the females of this species. It is their responsibility to take the logical approach, essentially reflective of the moral high road, and thereby protect and defend the woman's fidelity...under constant attack these days.

It is no secret that leading by example is the only means whereby this species truly progresses. Anything else is merely some variant form of manipulation which eventually manifests unsustainable perversions.

Thanks Mel, for not being the proverbial hollywood gigolo type like that moron Tiger Woods or the obviously despicable Jesse James. And for having the stones to speak your mind in the face of what is becoming a nearly insurmountable dung pile of "man bashing", disloyal schemes perpetrated by a growing populous of disingenuous females.