factbat.com

An article on MSNBC -- reporting on the passage of Obamacare in the Senate -- claims “it’s the law of the land” and even states in the tag that the legislation was “considered impossible just a few months ago.”

First of all, it is not a law because it is not constitutional, and there is no actual legal way to enforce the mandates in the bill. Second of all, it certainly was not something that a few months ago appeared to be impossible. For anyone who truly believed that the Obama administration would not use any and all means they could possibly derive to ram the legislation through, they have their head on backwards.

The essential concern is: How far will the American people go to secure their rights? Fortunately it appears they are willing, and wise enough, to go all the way.

Obamacare intends to ignore the free market, and the many years of manipulation that has been allowed by exempting insurance companies from Anti-trust legislation. Insurance companies have not been held to the rigors of competition that are so critical to preserving the rights of the consumer, and have instead been spoon fed federal mandated monies in the form of insurance requirements which either prohibited employers from using certain companies, or just made it inordinately difficult or expensive to use the ones they preferred.

This legislation ignores the fact that insurance companies are literally required to employ people able to operate with their finger on the pulse of society. Insurance is a business that must be constantly vigilant concerning whom they insure, and whom they can potentially insure.

If an insurance company wants to thrive, it must employ methodology which seeks to insure as many people as possible, while at the same time avoiding excessive payouts. They are forced by market parameters to avoid those who present as extremely risky, or those who engage in unhealthy habits such as smoking cigarettes or alcohol abuse.

What is striking, and exculpatory, in this analysis, is the fact that simply denying coverage is not an option. The company would go bankrupt, or be required to resort to deceptive tactics that would likely find them getting sued often. Unfortunately, the current status quo is one that proves the insurance industry chose to collude with the government and find ways to corner the market instead.

However, if the government was not acting outside of its jurisdiction, and the insurance companies were required to operate on a level playing field, it would require that these companies become more involved in the daily operation of the nation on the personal level America’s service industries first began with, and this would change -- for the better -- many things in the nation.

Insurance companies would find that the best way to ensure a profitable business would be to engage the many things in society which present the risks to their clients. They would have no choice but to demand that automobiles be safer; that roads be properly maintained, and congestion kept at viable levels; that food corporations operate in the people’s best interest by marketing and selling healthy food with the same intensity they market and sell the more profitable products which possess long shelf lives but are very toxic and debilitating; that the government allocate more money for health education and reduce the need for dangerous pharmaceuticals; that warnings be placed on all wireless devices, computers, televisions and other appliances which emit dangerous levels of radiation; that companies which dump toxic waste into waters, cease their behaviors or be put out of business; and many other things that are causing much of the health crises in this nation.

The insurance companies would also find it necessary to implement their own educational marketing schemes aimed at informing people of what things they can avoid, and changes they can make in their daily lives which could make them eligible for lower premiums. After all, many of the choices people in this nation make -- which put them in a high premium bracket -- are just that, choices.

This type of accountability, and corporate responsibility, would begin to engender an insurance industry which would require much less regulation, and would free-up a great deal of revenue and space that is currently allocated for the barrage of citizens suffering from entirely preventable maladies. Furthermore, many of those inundating the medical industry with these medical concerns are uneducated, or undereducated, individuals who typically do not have the money to pay the medical cost of treatment.

Unfortunately, the government caused this terrible mess by colluding with corporations that operate outside of the people's best interests, and it now expects to force the cost onto insurance companies. While it is true that these poor people, and their plethora of ignorant maladies, cannot now be ignored, giving the government even more powers to now enter the gambling house of insurance and deal from the bottom of the deck will only make matters worse.

It is time to set the record straight and begin a true reformation in the entire nation. What is essential to understand is that this reformation must take place from the bottom up, not the top down. And it begins with education.

What is interesting are the dedeptive field operations that were implemented by the government --against the average sovereign individual in this nation -- because the Democrats will certainly pay for their sedition in November, and likely all future elections. The people have nearly had enough.

One of the most appalling examples of political shenanigans against the public was to send out promoters of the bill into areas where citizens were protesting - such as at Tea Party rallies - and interview people on camera while asking them specific questions about various complicated language in the bill, and when they could not answer the questions in any real detail, the creators of the videos used this as reason to claim the people did not have a legitimate dissenting voice.

Various videos on Youtube present people as ignorant or stupid because all they can think of to say is, “well, it’s unconstitutional,” or “the government can’t seem to run anything else properly, I don’t want them taking over health care.” When in all actuality these are entirely legitimate reasons for opposing the bill.

The United States Constitution was crafted in such a way as to allow each and every citizen in this nation to speak with a clear voice, and not be required to embroil themselves in complex analysis of duplicitous legalese. That there are many things in the bill which will manifest excessive corruption, misfeasance, federal intrusion, criminal discrimination, denial of basic human rights, etc. is for minds such as this authors, and I engage my human responsibility at nearly every turn with little complaint.

However, the supreme law of this land enables an elective environment where no average citizen is required to do anything more than remind the government that any action they take must conform to the United States Constitution they swore to uphold, protect and defend when they accepted their election or appointment to office.

This is a critical mechanism which allows this country to remain free and protective of their individual rights and autonomy, while at the same time provide for limited centralized governance of the overall social and economical structure. It is essential to maintaining order among the society and accountability in the government.

The United States Constitution allows every citizen in this nation to be a part of the processes of governance in and around their personal lives. It sets boundaries that are not to be flouted or crossed, and which prohibit the primary precursors to tyrannical and authoritarian control, without requiring any individual to be a criminal investigator or forensic genius.

If every citizen in this nation were held to the rigors employed by the many miscreant sophists now inundating the government then it would quickly fall into utter disrepair.

To be imposing on the individual a mandate which requires them to carry health insurance goes above and beyond any powers the government is afforded in the United States Constitution. This is a market variable that cannot be placed on the sovereign individual. Requiring things such as auto insurance if one desires to drive a private mode of transportation that poses tangible risks is barely legal because at least people can choose not to drive. However, there are also legal arguments which would place accessibility issues in the path to such a mandate, and may eventual be addressed by those who seek a redress of grievances in this matter as well.

Just take a good look at anything unconstitutional the government has ever done, and the destructive consequences they have manifest. For instance, the war on drugs, which actually began as a government collusion with snake-oil salesmen, created “patent medicines”, and allocated them for various deceptive manufacturers of tonics. These tonics were nothing but narcotics marketed and sold as cures. The narcotics only enabled the brain and body to ignore the debilitating effects of whatever condition the consumer was suffering from, and thus allowed the condition to worsen to the point of irreversibility or fatality.

Rather than educate the public about these products, the government just demanded a piece of the action. When the destructive effects reached terminal velocity -- too many victims or people getting wise to the sham -- the government then chose an unconstitutional mandate; prohibition of a personal choice substance.

Occasionally the government is forced -- by some (ahem) wise individual -- to admit that they merely regulate the transport of these drugs, and that they all fall into a health and safety category which is clearly arguable in any court in this nation. This is the smoke and mirrors the CIA hides behind when they deal illicit drugs in this nation.

Since the passage of the Health Care Reform Bill, President Obama, who claimed that “this is what change looks like”, appears to be betting that most Americans will not realize that Obamacare is acutally a mountain of “status quo” marching out of the White House in spades.

The administration seems incessant of refusing to admit that the sea change has already started, and that the people fully realize that Obama’s “hope and change” message was merely a ruse to get him elected. He has not made good on even one campaign promise. Including Obamacare, since he promised it would garner wide support, and would not require partisan politics. He is quoted as saying “this will be something the entire nation will be able to get behind, and support.”

The people are demanding change in government and the end of “business as usual.” But Obama has only sought sweeping legislation that gives the government more power and control in an attempt to quell the growing dissent.

The people are demanding an audit and eventual abolition of the private banking cartel known as the Federal Reserve; which operates with impunity due to alleged affiliation with the United States Congress. But Obama has chosen to increase its powers, and endorse the excessively secretive Ben Bernanke who will not even answer questions about where trillions of dollars of foreign bank bailout money has been directed to.

The people are demanding transparency in the legislative process. And although Obama pretended to listen to this demand, and claimed he would implement measures to prove it, he has become more secretive than any other president in history; even refusing to disclose who visit’s the White House. He promised he would allow sweeping legislation to be posted on the internet for one week prior to introduction, and then attempted to sneak Obamacare past a vigilant public and GOP watchdogs.

The people demanded an end to the wars. But Obama escalated them. Furthermore, he has not even made one demonstrative attempt to engage countries such as Iran with executive diplomacy. Instead he decided to chair the United Nations Security Council in blatant violation of the United States Constitution, and further the aims of global government, New World Order “nut-jobs,” and world central-bankers

The people demanded that the crooks on Wall Street -- who were largely responsible for the nation’s financial meltdown -- be held accountable. However, Obama decided it would best behoove his efforts, and those of his criminal ilk, to just pay them to keep quiet, and thus obscure the activities of the criminally wealthy who are leeching off of this nation, and his own personal involvement in many of the real estate scams that were, and still are, at the center of the housing crisis.

Time is not permitting, so the article must end here. However there is much to detail as far as what the nation can expect from this monstrosity of a bill, and the factbat website will be posting a full analysis within the week...

This administration has certainly set itself on a very slippery slope. It is likely that the Obama presidency will have been both one of the best, and worst, in United Sates history because, although the administration is proving it has the ability to ignore the will of the people on historic levels, it is forcing the average citizen to stand up and take notice of the duplicitous canards of their government, and take back their rightful control of the nation.