factbat.com

What is of significant concern to a nation which must weigh the pro’s and con’s of the various plights of groups of persons who demand that some of their more destructive and aberrant behaviors be openly tolerated, or accepted as normal, is that these groups typically do not conform to the atmosphere of freedom created by the tenets of “inalienable rights” afforded the individual, and instead expect to be able to force a collective will upon an entire society.

Whether it is homosexuality, divisive religiosity, vengeful race bias, or plutocracy and social class, the majority of groups who engage these themes will insist that they are doing nothing wrong when choosing demonstrably deviant behaviors either for or against the concept, and that the main problem is that those around them are merely intolerant bigots or inhospitable malcontents who are attempting to deny them their rights.

For example, the majority of Jewish people expect to be afforded a level of paranoia that allows them to attack others with inordinate and excessive accusations or actions. The Jewish Holocaust -- which pales in comparison to many abuses sustained by other groups -- is used as an excuse, ad nauseam, by Jewish people who attempt to indemnify their threatening and divisive behaviors with displays of fear and angst over past abuses.

It is astonishing to hear from even those Jews who claim to be my friend, that I am going to get killed for what I put on my factbat website. They do not concern themselves with issues of race, sexual orientation, class or religious beliefs other than Judaism, only what I say about the miscreant policies of the current state of Israel and the Jewish doctrine. These are threats which come from a people who truly believe that they have a right to abuse those who do not conform to their will, which they claim is exfoliated by a belief that they are the chosen people of a deity determined by them to be the supreme ruler of this world.

Furthermore, they engage conflict with aggression and expect to not be ostracized for it. Regardless of how veiled the threats may be, they are still threats and are proffered amid an entitlement mentality they claim cannot be questioned since the rise, and eventual fall, of the Hitler Nazi Regime.

What is puzzling about this scenario is that the group of people calling themselves Jews has been ostracized all throughout recorded history, by almost every nation and kingdom. Not because of their skin color, ethnic background or questionable beliefs, but because of their actions, and the fact that they could not be trusted to engage the business sector without creating inordinate levels of angst from those who claimed to be getting cheated by them.

Many a ruler of the ancient nations were forced to ban Jews from various areas because of the complaints from their people. Complaints that could not have been the acts of bigots because they were all of them made by varying classes, races and religious beliefs who said essentially the same thing; “Jews will not play by the rules and are ripping us all off.”

Verbatim statements in recorded accounts of these many rulers, when codified, all exude the same sentiment; “ For protection of the general populous from deceptive schemes, I do not wish to hurt the Jews, and thus they must be exiled for fear that others may.” These rulers often even voiced how much they loathed having to ostracize an entire group of people, having found themselves incapable of thwarting the veritable espionage they were certain would one day attack the very heart of all social structures.

To research and expose the many scurrilous activities of the Jewish people is not something this author relishes, and it is only done out of concern for the legitimate consternation and angst they are causing for so many in this world, and the fact that it is balkanizing entire geographical regions. There is a reason why the United States was a nation who saw fit to hang horse thieves, because when one is deprived of their livelihood, then they are essentially deprived of their life.

Far too many groups of people believe they are afforded the right, under the United States Constitution, to force those around them to tolerate and support their excessively discriminating behaviors as if they were those of an individual. When in reality their actions are typically those deemed acceptable by some specific doctrine or ideal which does not comply with the essential tenets of autonomy and freedom set out by this constitution.

This is a constitution which exposes the fact that as human beings we are all born with the same inalienable rights, and thus the same inalienable responsibilities, and are charged with upholding these rights in everything that we do.

Far too many individuals are expecting to be afforded inordinate levels of aberrant behavior within the society, claiming their behaviors are a right protected under the constitution. When actually, much of their behaviors are patently opposed to the U.S. Constitution in that they flout the inalienable right of others to oppose them. This gives rise to entire groups of people who then band together for the purpose of forcing deviant ideals upon an entire populous under the guise of autonomy.

They essentially refuse to accept the fact that as human beings in a skewed contemporary society we can all find ourselves tempted to engage in aberrant behaviors which allow one to ignore and avoid various social conflicts. Furthermore, these conflicts are typically inherently critical mechanisms which are necessary for progress of the species, and when avoided, many of the natural checks and balances created within a world such as this -- which is entirely governed by the cyclic Universe it exists within -- are removed.

What is significant about this cyclic Universe is that it is created, bound and determined by duality. Furthermore, there is no cycle that exists without it. This duality is what commands the species to engage in conflict, and this friction is paramount to the evolutionary cycle, in that it allows ignorance to become the breeding ground for progress. If humans were not meant to progress then they would be born -- as animals are -- with instinct rather than inspiration. But instead humans are born ignorant and are thus inspired in every way by “the question.”

Whenever humanity avoids conflict -- whether by employing aggression or demanding impunity -- the intrinsic design function parameters of the species become a foundation for acts of dereliction.

All those who consign to the faulty mentality which lauds supremacy and separatism as the core constructive mechanism for their continued survival, regardless of the proposed intent, will always find themselves eventually ostracized and alienated.

There are certainly a few people in this author’s local environment who, through their faulty mentality of reprisal, have chosen such a fate. Fortunately, for them, their threatening behaviors do not elicit an identically vengeful and intolerant mentality, but merely the logical act of repudiation.