factbat.com

While it is generally a common belief, in certain circles, that the nation must openly accept the personal choice of homosexuals to engage in sexual relations with the same gender and treat this behavior as an equally plausible alternative to natural heterosexual relations in order to guarantee the constitutional rights of all American‘s, the fact is that the U.S. Constitution was conceived, penned and ratified for the sole purpose of protecting only those inalienable rights which demonstrably apply to all people unanimously.

The bill of rights expressly prohibits their use as a vehicle to further the aims of any individual’s, or group’s, personal interests.

There is no aberrant form of these rights, and the only rights allowed homosexuals are those which all people are born with, and these include the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Furthermore, to live unmolested and free to move about without fear of reprisal; to be secure in their effects; the right to protect and defend themselves; the right to expect that a jury trial shall always be preserved, etc.

In wording the previous right, known to many as the 7^th amendment, I do so to further illuminate that this right is “to be preserved”. It is not a choice, nor an elective of the accused. It is a right which crosses all boundaries and protects both the accused and the accuser (note that I did not say “defendant“). Those Americans who misunderstand the basic principle commanding the respect of one’s rights as set forth in their Constitution, do so at the peril of all. But I digress.

None of the inalienable rights of humans includes the right to impose one’s will upon another, nor to demand inordinate levels of validation for their personal beliefs or aims. The demand, by homosexuals, that they be allowed to infringe upon the sanctified union of marriage - which necessarily includes all people in that it is a union between a man and a woman - bears no relevance whatsoever to the liberties defined by the constitution of the United States of America. To insist that homosexuals are excluded from the institution of marriage would posit that they are not human. The institution of marriage most certainly includes them, and it is saying that it does so in respect of all humans, and spares none specifically from the tenets it upholds.

Marriage was created for the union between a man and a woman, thus respecting both genders equally - not one more than another - and excludes none on the basis of race, religion, social class, ethnicity, disability, size, shape, hair color, eye color, job…you name it. It’s only claim is to the respect of humanity as a whole, and makes no assumptions nor claims to the contrary. Including preferential treatment for homosexuality.

Furthermore, the institution of holy matrimony was crafted under the auspicious realms of fidelity which must certainly seek all means within reach endeavoring to maintain and guarantee the posterity of ones’ familial heritage, if for no other reason than to create accountability to the offspring produced, because the need for posterity includes many national interests dependant on securing this most precious natural resource.

When analyzing homosexual behaviors, and the propensities of those who engage in such, what becomes blatantly obvious is that few other deviants demand so ardently to be lauded for their perverse behaviors.

It is common knowledge that the majority of homosexual males are pedophiles, and as well, experiences among homosexual females has given rise to a concern that they may also seek under-age partners.

This then illuminates the proclivity of homosexuality to be in many ways actively disparaging of the familial relationship in this nation in that their behaviors typically engender an atmosphere which is inhospitable to children.

Not merely by engaging in child molestation and variant levels of pedophilia which now proposes to encourage school children to experiment with homosexuality. But by also soliciting various levels of depravity while demanding to be awarded equal time for activities that deride the true nature of equality by claiming that it must conform to one’s identity.

However, one of the more disturbing trends paralleling the homosexual issue, is the manipulation of the social structure in America by employing homogenous communication and anti-hetero sentiments.

What is imperative to understanding this analogy is in exposing the fact that the natural Heterogeneity of human relations incorporates variances in society which are not readily manipulable, thus this diversity has the natural effect of protecting the individual autonomy of those in the group. Furthermore, the conflicting ideals and aspirations of a free society, which are critical to proper progression, are greatly reduced with the onset, and proliferation, of homogeneity.

There has been much study in the areas of human relations and responses in American society, and typically that which has brought the most desirable results for large corporations has been the study and implementation of homoscedastics.

Homoscedastics, or Homoscedasticity, is a sequence of events, or vector of random variables, which are characterized by the same finite variance. In social circles this can present as an orthodox opinion maintained across varying and conflicting determinations of empirical fact. Essentially, many intelligent people from various realms of thought convinced to agree upon the same misconception.

The implementation of various extrapolations based on this phenomenon have been employed extensively by corporate identities and their bureaucratic counterparts for the sole purpose of predicting outcomes over a wide range of variables. Much of the research was focused on deciphering a wide range of pervasive mechanisms which, when implemented properly, would engender an atmosphere of homogeneity in the populous, thus creating predictable outcomes.

This has been employed extensively in the marketing sector where the main concern was determining how to broadcast multilateral infusions of coordinated data which would create a mono-elective prerogative in consumers. Essentially tricking people into believing they had made a choice, when in all actuality they had merely followed the pattern suggested.

As ultramodern and horrifying as this may sound, it is not a new concept, and the perverse and corrosive societal interactions this type of manipulation can produce, threatens to spin a most “trepidacious” web of confusion among a significant portion of the population.

Regardless of the fact that homosexuality appears to have been around for millennia, it is unconscionable for any agency or corporation to increase its proliferation within society merely for the purpose of creating social and economic compliance among the citizenry.

The study of homoscedastics has become an alchemistic attempt at manipulation of the diversity in this nation. One glaring point is that any form of mono-thinking will produce predictable results, and in such an environment autonomy and the ability to think freely become severely threatened.

It is no secret that homosexuals, regardless of race, social class, religion or gender will typically congregate in the same areas and businesses, buy many of the same products, demand much of the same treatment, act in much the same manner, deny many of the same things, and so on.

Although one could certainly claim that there are also other groups of people who exhibit some of the same propensities, this merely reiterates the point that whomever is being manipulated in accordance with their deference to an atmosphere of homogeneity, whether they be a minority or a majority, they are ripe for perversion.