factbat.com

The Obama administration is incredulously and idiotically expecting Americans to believe or perceive that there is such a thing as a company which is “too big too fail.”

So just what does this mean in the great scheme of things? Are they actually claiming that these huge corporations, which typically devour excessive resources while decreasing job opportunities, are offering the citizens something they just can’t live without?

Do they expect this nation to believe that these severely mismanaged and monopolizing companies which often create, and operate within, an environment of complete unsustainability and toxicity, are critical to the health and welfare of the nation?

Does President Obama truly believe that bailing out Wall Street and big banks is the way to effect the necessary change so critical in exorcizing the miscreant demons which have decimated the economy and now overpopulate what is now a veritable necropolis?

Does he contend that floating huge amounts of debt in order to accomplish his dream of socialist reform and authoritarian government control of the nation, while pandering to lobbyists and criminals, is the way to garner support from the average tax payer?

Does he truly believe that decadence and executive privilege are something which appeals to the majority of Americans?

The fact is that these huge corporations are actually too big to exist. They expect to be given preferential treatment from legislators. They operate with criminal impunity. They typically maintain balance sheets which enable them to sell products which are barely profitable and which kill thousands of Americans each year, while also sequestering revenues to pay huge law firms to protect them from litigation.

These companies create the need for regulations intended to prevent them from divulging in misfeasance while at the same time preventing proliferation of honest small businesses.

They pave the way for tax schemes enabled by the tactics of the Federal Reserve which manipulates the market and drives up prices with a diluted money supply. Higher prices means excess tax revenues which could never be maintained without the aid of huge corporations using government subsidies designed to allow them to operate in the inflated markets where sales falter when people cannot afford to support the expected trajectory of profit…thus reducing the workforce further.

Mismanagement is the norm in these companies as executives and owners distance themselves from their most important resources, their employees. Dislocation from the initial creative mechanisms which built the company occurs as the priority becomes manipulation of the public amid the changing landscape of a nation and world which threatens to make the company obsolete.

The truth is that the merging of companies into huge conglomerates also allows a diverse corporation to create an atmosphere of “full spectrum dominance” as the entity offers foods, insurance, medical supplies and even weapons. 

This diversity by a centralized corporation enables the possibility that they can offer various instigators that create problems which are necessary to effect a particular reaction that they can then propose a solution to. In effect manipulating an entire consumer base that may be completely unaware they are being literally corralled and led to the slaughter by a company they have been convinced to trust with their very lives.

For example, if a company provides a consumable which causes diabetes over a period of time, and at the same time owns an insurance company which offers inexpensive policies to these specific clients; and also is invested in medical providers which specialize in health care to those affected; and also owns a pharmaceutical subsidiary which supplies a popularized medication marketed to the particular condition, and so on, down to an eventual mortuary which offers free cremation services to those who eventually die of the maladies, thus destroying evidence which could indict them should an exhumation be ordered if and when they are exposed for the fraud, then diversity becomes an entirely undesirable proposition.

This is mainly the dichotomy created when people neglect to understand the true meaning of “sovereignty.” This is evidenced in the fact that this nation actually accepts the notion that a corporation can claim immunity as a national governmental subsidiary while at the same time being allowed to invoke the fifth amendment as if it were a private entity. One glaring example is the communications company AT&T which the government expects to shield from prosecution for their role in invading the constitutionally protected privacy of millions of Americans.

The rights of the individual are not transposable onto the corporate stage since these corporations, like government, pose a conflict of interest in that they are created by sovereign individuals which have no right, in such capacity, to pass any judgment upon another from outside of a duly sworn jury.

Furthermore, for the Supreme Court to have passed down a decision claiming that money is now speech is beyond their capacity since it infringes upon the freedom of speech of the individual and is expressly prohibit them under the United States Constitution. Furthermore, this unconstitutional decision is what paved the way for a campaign reform decision which removed the restrictions on contributions by corporations.

This exposes the fact that the latter decision is also beyond the Supreme Courts capacity in that it is unconstitutional.

These decisions will naturally be repealed as the nation wakes up to the scam which is being enabled by these too-big-to-exist corporations in bed with the fed.

For now, this author will do what he can to expose the Obama administration for its incessant denial of the American people through a president who obviously views the United States Constitution as nothing more than an obstacle to be avoided, that is until he is talking to his lawyer and inquiring on the best strategy for invoking his own constitutionally protected rights.