factbat.com

In Obama’s speech at Vermont Avenue Baptist Church he illuminated his rather disturbing propensity to attempt circumvention of the governmental process with sensationalism and denial. Moreover, he chose to blame voters for expectations he himself, in his many vague speeches, consistently professed to be able to deliver on.

Furthermore, in a less than genuine moment he mentions the “Folks [who] ask me sometimes why I look so calm.” To which he claims to confess “There are times where I am not so calm. There are times when the words that are spoken about me hurt…There are times when…change is so painfully slow in coming, and I have to comfort my own doubts.”

What about the doubts of all those who counted on Obama to follow through with his many vows to the American people? What about the fact that a United States President should be wise enough to understand that equitable and realistic change, especially concerning an entire nation, rarely, if ever, comes quickly.

Unless of course these changes are expected to be implemented and enabled by a great deal of sacrifice from the public, a delusional sentiment Barack Obama purported to voters ad nauseam, and which fails to mention the fact that the failing policies this nation is currently suffering under were rarely enacted with the blessing of those people they now harass and subjugate daily.

It appears that the only thing which elicits emotion from Obama is being derided, questioned, or disappointed. Strange behavior from a man who appears to have no compunction when it comes to speaking of war, or making decisions that kill millions of people, or blaming plausible incompetence for his lack of action.

It is likely, however, that Obama's smooth act and apparent lack of either compunction or consternation concerning the issues, and lack of compassion toward the people of this nation and their lives and livlihoods, is no act at all.

But then Obama expects to whisk away all doubts and determinations with one fanatical statement “Through god all things are possible.” Truly, why is the president of an international superpower invoking the name of what many consider to be an illusory edifice meant to comfort and appease the masses?

Regardless of one’s faith, it certainly has no place in government, and will only further hamper foreign relations.

To make matters even worse, in a further display of inaction from this failing administration Obama is now enlisting the aid of the former executive heads which he claimed all throughout his campaign for the Whitehouse to be in complete contrast with.

His recent close collaboration with Bill Clinton and George W Bush can only mean one of two things, considering President Obama‘s many broken vows made to the people

Desperation or Disloyalty.

Readers can decide for themselves which of these eviscerations more aptly defines the current theatre of disappointment Obama is creating. As for which one is worse, history has proven them to be almost equally destructive.

That Barack Obama is now so desperate for support -- both public and private -- that he is eliciting inept advice from those who many in this country believe to be little more than sexual deviants, war criminals, embezzlers and constitution-burning traitors, is a stark contrast to the smooth unflappable image he so deftly sold to a large portion of the American public.

The thin façade of “change” and “hope” that Obama dramatically preached to the nation is cracking beneath even the slightest pressure. However, just as disturbing are his statements in his speech Monday intended to honor the late Dr. Martin Luther King, as he admits that he does not even understand the sober realities of true change, and actually expected to affect monumental reforms expeditiously. Further exposing his lack of intuition amid a descriptively authoritarian bent.

His professed intentions of fighting the status quo with acts of transparency and multilateral diplomacy, are turning to ashes in an incendiary conflagration of vacillation which appears to now command his every move.

He is currently colluding with those he patently opposed in 2008 --disclaiming their necrotic acts of disloyalty to this nation -- and is proving to be little more than a contemptible puppet of the Bush regime, an administration which displayed nearly identical disingenuous and lethargic responses to areas destroyed by natural disasters.

Furthermore, on former president George W Bush’s watch some of this hapless behavior was directed at a natural disaster right in this very nation, hurricane ravaged Louisiana, where proximity posed no obstacles for an emergency response that created nearly identical results to those now transpiring in Haiti.

Who can forget the “shock and awe” of Desert Storm which Obama parroted when describing his intentions for war. Considering the funds and personnel he has been, and is proposing, throwing at his military campaigns, the shock to those he fooled with promises of diplomacy have elicited not one ounce of awe in the ironic tonnage of public consternation decrying his choice of violence.

Where is Obama’s focused action and unwavering dedication when people are in need?

His mere mention of this military tactic now proves him to be mendaciously inhumane in his intentions, given the fact that such tactics of military strategy are much more difficult to orchestrate than is that of humanitarian aid expected to produce the opposite results with the same efficiency.

It is quite obvious that the “audacity of hope” Barack Obama is most fond of is that which expects those less fortunate to simply consign themselves to the fact that they will be allotted no such aspiring sentiments during his short reign as offender of the flame.

It does come as quite a shock however, to witness both Bush and Clinton once again at the helm of this awesome nation. Regardless of who may expect such former elected officials to contribute various forms of guidance and assistance, the fact is that their involvement raises nearly insurmountable concerns for conflicts of interest.

Whether the people in this nation voted a leader out of office, or merely bided their time until the constitution prevented such from continuing to impose their prerogatives, it is nothing short of ridiculous and disparaging to so demonstrably allow any such former president to indefinitely influence the decisions of the executive office in this nation -- and quite possibly act as the mastermind of policy -- whether in public or from behind the proverbial curtain.

The democratic process is specifically designed to prohibit all such actions of sedition and collusion, and the people in this nation have every right as the sovereign creators of government to demand that this disloyal practice be abrogated with all due diligence.

For Barack Obama to be so openly exposing a lack of diplomatic abilities, and in such actions be demeaning the office he holds during time of war, brings to light an indefensible transgression of falling asleep at his post. And as any informed military person knows, this act is expressly afforded no form of discretionary discernment whatsoever in the presence of battle, for the act cannot be clearly determined as either simply negligent or collusively intentional.

If the current levels of threat haranguing this administration were seen to exist within the proposed elements of dereliction, in the United States Navy the man would be summarily led out onto the quarterdeck and executed.

In deference to military principle, and the fact that the office which Barack Obama holds -- as Commander In Chief -- demands interminable accountability, the citizens of these United States are bound by the US Constitution, as sovereigns to protect the liberties of each and every citizen by holding the executive branch of the government, and all government officials, accountable for acts of incompetence.

There can be no more acceptance of ingratiating, and deprecating disclosures of ignorance as defense against resignation or removal from the post being adulterated.

These “career politicians” damned well know better, and if they truly do not, then they must be, in defense of all whom they represent, expeditiously impeached their position of authority.

The nation can no longer afford to languish in mediocrity and shame at the behest of politicians who resign themselves to audaciously benign optimism in the face of so many critical engagements now demanding the focused attention of, what must be, courageously wise and honorable leaders.

Barack Obama is certainly not the first preposterously pragmatic and reckless leader to attempt dragging this nation and its reputation slip-shod through the mud, but he certainly needs to be the last.