factbat.com

Homosexual males and females are human beings with rights that are just as inalienable and important as any person on this planet, and they deserve to have them defended and protected with fervor and grace.

However, given the level of responsibility ensconced upon the weighty institution of marriage, and its endowment of sanctity which necessarily intends to protect and defend the ability of this species to procreate and continue existing upon this planet, an ability gays and lesbians cannot claim to be naturally capable of, homosexuals have no real right to demand infiltration and deviation of this institution. As well, they should not be allowed to infringe upon what for many is considered a holy union, merely to prove they are afforded their human rights.

Gays and lesbians already possess all of the basic inalienable human rights every citizen in this nation now enjoys, but forcing this round peg (homosexuality) into a square hole (marriage) will do nothing more than attempt to raise their status of deviated gender relations above every naturally conforming union in this nation, as they will then be receiving an obvious preferential treatment merely because they essentially threw a tantrum, and, at times, threatened various public officials with the power to swing votes at election time.

While it may be true that many abuses have been played out legally throughout history in the name, and under the sanctity of, the established institution of marriage, these failures do not somehow now nullify the reasoning which created it.

Furthermore, it appears completely ridiculous that many homosexuals intend to attack the ideology of marriage by claiming its parameters have allowed it to be used abusively against many people over the centuries, while simultaneously demanding they be allowed to engage in it. If the intention of gay protests and marches against proposition 8 is to demand some form of equal rights, then why also attack the institution as abusive? Does this not prove the politicization of their cause? Does this not question the veracity of their claim?

On that note, the fact that interracial marriages were prohibited in the past, but eventually allowed, also does not set any precedent which inures homosexuals with a legitimate argument for recognition of their behaviors as some activity to be revered and sought after in the same light as natural gender relations and sexual behaviors which certainly are critical in the extension of humanity’s presence and growth upon this planet, and indeed within this Universe.

Truly, where is the posterity homosexuals seek?

What guides their demand for equal time? Dominance?

Truly, what part of humanity are they proposing to enhance by adulterating this sanctified union?

Where are these indelibly defensible contributions they appear to be claiming can exfoliate among this species an indefatigable presence necessary for survival?

If there be none, then it is a preposterous notion to demand homosexuality be given the right to besiege the one institution in this world which was created explicitly to protect the natural unification of intercourse which bears humanity’s veritable golden egg, lain by those faithful.

Most heterosexuals possess a typical consignment of resignation which allows them to tolerate incredible amounts of irrational moods, emotions and irritations, thereby assisting in abrogating many of the daily resentments which tend to diminish various aggregates of their union. Conversely, many homosexuals live in an alternate reality saturated with spiteful, intolerant, bitchy people who exist within a type of entitlement mentality they demand excludes them from typical exposure to elemental impositions and uncomfortable situations.

There are so very many courageous individuals in this world who live indefatigably within the parameters of nature and reality, and they do it absent many of the pleasures and palatability’s so many of perverse exploits enjoy constantly. There are many heterosexuals who have (ahem!) not had sex in many years because there are so very many partialities, impositions, mutual exchanges and ultimately common concerns which must be admonished and forged in unified contrast for furtherance of the morally corporal union between a man and a woman. These difficulties are being exacerbated constantly in today’s world, and unfortunately, far too many people are merely opting to avoid these uncommon valor’s and engage in simple, and unproductive, mutual perversions.

Why are the weak now demanding, and receiving, exaltation and rewarded for such salaciously perverse conviviality’s?

Moreover, it is common knowledge that the vast majority of homosexuals gather in public toilets and various other necromancies where they engage in excessive casual sex and salacious perversions; noodle gazing at heterosexuals, and masturbating at urinals. Furthermore, this author has seen far too much of the propensity for homosexual males to molest young boys. Even to the extreme of witnessing them openly masturbate in front of 10 and 11 year old boys changing to go swimming in public toilets in Hawaii. While it can be said there are plenty of perverted hetero males, for one to expose himself to a young female does not in any way confuse her as it does for a man to expose himself to a young male.

So, I ask again. What is this tremendous contribution from homosexuals that this species just cannot live or thrive without? And if there be none, then demanding they be allowed to marry in the traditional sense is absolutely preposterous, and given the nature of this institution’s proposed objective, it insults the Universal right of all humanity.

Yes, I still believe that homosexuals must be given every opportunity for the furtherance of a happy and fruitful life on this planet. They are human beings with feelings and rights which must be respected and protected…

I just see no reason to exalt them to the level of “creators and protectors of the human race”.