factbat.com

In properly analyzing the American woman, it is imperative to first understand the American man. While this analogy, or theory if you wish, may cause the reader to assume this statement codifies the identification of the female within the validation of the male, that is not how it is being inferred. However, the fact remains that to truly lend either gender a generous portion of humanity, one must first consider their similarities.

In seeking to peel away the layers of solicitation or manipulation in the woman, the logic of the man indemnifies the species most conclusively. Simply the fact that women are penetrated during copulation requires a form of behavior that in some ways must defy a portion of logic. This is indicative in the fact that the species instinctively seeks to mate for life. A woman is, by nature, nurturing and therefore must look beyond the superfluous realms of sexual contact, and into the perspective realms of passion and romance.

In contrast, the man seeks to provide and protect. These prospects, while not solely the man’s responsibility, are typically reserved to him, and are enabled, or engendered, in a more logical prerogative. Logic is necessary to overcome emotions invoked when engaging in some variation of dangerous activity. This fact does not, however, justify violence, which is basically inured through an ignorance that is intended to be eventually mastered amid the amalgamation of the endemic societies, and gender biases, on the planet, but I digress.

The male is by nature logical, and his Universal role will always be the more constructive of the genders. Merely the physical features of the male can attest to the fact that he is the more corporal of the species, and significantly more physically durable. These traits also require specifically elective logic. Conversely, the fragility of most women, including the increased maintenance requirements of the female anatomy, require particularly illogical, or emotional, behaviors.

During the origins of this species’ proliferation on Earth, if a woman was to attract a man to protect and provide for her, she invariably needed to elicit the man’s desire to do so. True also today, and the womans methods will rarely be in any way a logical endeavor, and thus the sociological strength of any society created, will always begin to break down when the species considers sexual behaviors and sexual conquests to be casual. Logic is casual, emotion is not.

Fortunately, no human being on the planet is either entirely logical, nor entirely emotional, or this species would have become extinct long ago. Moreover, the significant diversity of emotional and logical levels between the genders is an entirely critical Homo sapien parameter.

What becomes rather significant, is the fact that a woman’s biological clock and physical features allow her to engage in a slightly larger realm of attributes and analogies that the male has no use for, and thus denies. This denial is not a negative consciousness, but is, rather, an intrinsic survival mechanism that has long been overlooked by scientists and biologists. The fact that fear has become the predominantly accepted survival mechanism, which proposes that natural selection and survival of the fittest are supreme, is ignorant of the fact that emotion is entirely gender specific on various levels. To posit that fear, or flight, are critical to survival has allowed many nefarious and sadistic natured doctrines and dogmas to proliferate quite apathetically on this planet, and has gone much to far in simultaneously creating an incredibly divisive and combative balkanizing conflagration of derelict social activities and conformities. But, once again I digress.

What is most crucial here is assessing the nature of the women in American society, and understanding the levels of manipulation and deprivation that are surrounding and saturating their critically specific paternal and emotionally nurturing contributions.

Max Factor began his illustrious makeup career as a manufacturer of facial applications which allowed the fledging, and rudimentary, motion picture cameras of the era to pick up reflected light from the face, which would typically have been absorbed, or refracted improperly without it. His powdery substances also alleviated the face distorting “shine” on film, caused by facial oils. These powdery substances and glossy lip coloring devices were never meant for women to actually hide behind in daily life.

The makeup women wear, or feel they require, is nothing more than a deception. That it has become so incredibly prolific in the society, truly should cause all citizens to question, just where the consensus is headed. Yes, it is understood that some women do not wear makeup, however, most to, and there are many levels of women who just wear small portions of it, or wear it with the intention of looking like they are not wearing it. The many facets of denial and delusion are deeply set and at times disturbing. There are some women who would not dare leave the house without it, and will cry, get angry or even exhibit panic attacks, if forced to. While it is true that much of the major nations’ women wear makeup, American women are the focus of this article.

What may be the most unfortunate part of writing an article such as this, is the fact that it will invariably cause defensive resistance, or offend so many women, and plenty of men will no doubt be required to claim they are offended by it as well. Now, this doesn’t mean that there are not plenty of men out there who will truly get offended, but this is merely because American society actually has the nerve to pretend that simply holding women accountable for their actions is some kind of attack on them. And many men are merely fear based control machines who need to feel like they are protecting women. However, the presiding cause for any need to protect a woman on this planet is being created by the voluminous amount of perversions chosen, exacerbated, or allowed. Remove the vittles and the beast dies.

However, men in this society have been sold books (actually best sellers) like “how to pick up women” and various other deplorable mechanisms meant to deter his logic. Intrinsic, or instinctual, logic of the well adjusted and functional Homo sapien male, would require him to actually labor to attain whatever level of attributes would gain him notoriety by the opposite sex in his chosen class. To actually attempt to acquire the affections of a woman absent the qualities necessary to sustain an equitable relationship with her is not logical, and no real man would ever attempt it. This is not to say that one woman’s requirements are superior to another, nor that any mans abilities are either. It purely states the fact that diversity prevails, thus both logic and emotion are necessary contributions, and they are required in their demonstrable levels by the particular gender specifically associated with either. These traits then specify what role each has in consenting to relations between them.

This is just another indication that the American woman is being severely perverted, and many times has no idea what man she is seeking, or inadvertently attracting. Therefore, she follows whatever sociological means are significantly employed at the time, exposing women’s propensity to obsess with trends and fads. This analogy is not something many people want to hear, however, it is no less true. As well, in the realm of gender reversal, or perversion of feminism, the fact that males have been taught to be illogical and subsist on sexual gratification in order to ignore their shortcomings, is no excuse for the women to attempt to follow suit and truly assist the entire society in becoming adverse to its demonstrable role in this Universe.

This is how Oprah Winfrey became popular. Her basic daily message was intended to vilify the burgeoning desires of the perverted female role in this nation. What is significant is that, while Oprah may be ignorant to much of this reality, there likely are a significant array of intellectuals around her, and involved with her, who most certainly are not. Why she was allowed to proliferate, is what causes much of this author’s angst when considering the manipulative perversions Oprah Winfrey has inflicted on the many disheartened and disenfranchised women in this country.

To be clear. This does not indict the female populous, nor does it say they are bad…only somewhat misguided, and sometimes intentionally. The intense amounts of propaganda which engendered much of the divisive consternation and competition between American males and females was assisted by various socioeconomic groups, federal agencies, foundations and governing bodies. To be clear, Gloria Steinem, however well meaning, assisted the government in various projects aimed at emancipating the American woman for one reason only. To bring them into the work force as a viable tax paying citizen, not to empower them. Regardless of what resistance this information elicits, it is unfortunately, no less a fact. The woman in the workplace eventually almost doubled the amount of per capita employees paying income tax to the IRS. As well, many other manipulations and adulterations of the entire populous have been employed to increased tax revenues, the specifics of which will follow in other articles. However, be certain, the perversion of the American female is extremely profitable to many corporations. Conversely, it is corrosive to this society.

To have first attacked the American male is logical, and indicates the incremental investment made by many entities and industries. Once the virility and validity of the male comes entirely into question, the female then becomes overly exposed. Yes, this seeks to indict the male population for its role in enabling the adulteration of the female population. However, this does not negate the contribution necessary by all persons in this nation to begin setting the ship aright, and the record straight.

Women do, however, have an extremely important and demonstrable role to play in healing the morality and logical progress in this country. This nation, and its women, must begin to understand the destructive nature of pornography, and their incessant proclivity to engage in it. The fact that porno is showing women getting penetrated by multiple males or engaging them orally, and the fact that there are far too many women now requesting such perverse activities, even multiple women on one man, is a clear indication that the society is accelerating in perversions which will be destructive to its prosperity and health. These types of pornography are not freedom of speech, nor art, and truly should be shunned by this entire nation…if her citizens actually intend to call themselves Constitutional Americans, of which requires a particularly lofty level of morality.

The logic in this nation is now being obtruded to the point that emotion will attempt to supplant and control many logical contributions. This type of behavior, if not properly checked, will spawn increasing levels of manipulative divestment…one of them being exponentially increasing magnitudes of homosexuality. Regardless of political correctness or alternate-sexual orientation rights, homosexuality is a perversion and is counterproductive. On a side note, various biological and scientific manipulations have contributed to homosexuality, and the introduction of various forms of hormones, testosterones, cells and chemicals into the food supply have shown significant abnormal effects. Feminizing the population was another test which was engaged by various governmental organizations, and is one of the factors determining accelerated hormonal changes in young women who are reaching various forms of maturity earlier each decade.

What is sad is that women have gotten a taste of some perverse powers and are now obsessing on them, as they should, they are primarily emotional. Regardless, the fact is that they are incredibly deceitful about it most of the time, in a completely absurd format much of the human population on this planet is incessant of terming “socialized”, or “socially acceptable”. This format was initially inspired by a desire to create proper conformities and controls which protected the sanctity of what all humans are born with, the need to bear fruit. That this instinct was understandably ignored by an infantile species, in many ways is what then caused the obtrusion of the wisdom necessary to engender a more equitable sociological mechanism intended to guarantee the purity of the common familial relationships.

To have ever chosen to employ a contractual control such as marriage as an institution of fidelity, was ignorant of evolutionary processes in humans, which also exist across all portions of the Universe, and thus can never truly encourage the posterity of that selected union.

This article is meant to expose just a small portion of the presiding instigators and indications which have enabled an entire society to incrementally fall off course. While there is much more information to consider, the facts are quite evident that this society needs to begin pulling back from the proverbial edge of the chasm. While it is true that feeling pleasure is an intrinsic human ability, it is not critical to survival, and must be apportioned its proper level of merit. To excessively engage in it for any reason will eventually manifest a perverse catastrophe.