factbat.com

So, it appears that America is expected to heed dietary advice from the likes of ignorant and moronic buffoons like Charles Barkely. Who, not only completely denigrates and decieves an antire demographic of adult males, by claiming that "steak and pizza" are "man food" (what a prick!). But also pretends that exposing his transvestite proclivities opens up some new realm of credibility. As if dressing in drag has anything to do with enabling a full-spectrum field of personal vision.

There is not a man alive who needs to find a "feminine side" to his character, simply to avoid some allegedly myopic misunderstanding of his role within the human social arenas of this species.

Nor do men require "man food". The body of both males and females are identical in their nutritional requirements, regardless of what foolish fallacies are meant to lead people to believe otherwise.

Who gives a rat crap what Charles Barkely says about most anything? Especially about dietary requirements of the human body.

Barkely is not a nutrition specialist, nor anything even remotely akin to an educated professional in the areas of health and human diet.

Furthermore, Weight Watchers is nothing more than an exploitative and asinine bunch of self-serving jackasses who's only objective is to recruit as many irresponsible and weak minded persons as inhumanely possible, into their ranks, with deceptive and pandering propaganda bent on convincing their victims that their dietary choices have absolutely no effect on their weight.

The objective of the company is quite obviously directed at obscuring absolutely every area of human health and healing. And instead is intended to create dietary schematics which clearly exist outside of the perameters of "edible", by characterizing each selection in terms of "tolerability" within the human body.

Even if some reasonably healthy person did actually lose weight by eating their food -- which is highly unlikely -- the lack of healing properties in the items offered by WW will certainly decrease any such person's energy levels, mental clarity, and life span. Among other things.

Charles Barkely was being perfectly honest when he inadvertently exposed his personal opinion that collecting a paycheck from Weight Watchers for his job as a spokesperson "was a scam".

Moreover, he was entirely correct in his analysis of the role he plays for the company.

Anyone who intends to continue eating the chocolate cake, charred, cheese smothered dead aminal flesh and overprocessed, perservative tainted and poisonous offerings that the majority of food companies sell as "food", will continue to place themselves, and the world around them, at extreme risk of death and debilitation as a result of both obesity and toxic syndromes.

Weight Watchers is proposing to sell people a "get out of jail free" card. Promising their targeted customers a life free of the natural realms of cause and effect. Clearly insinuating that people are not responsible for their own behaviors. But, on the contrary, are merely victims of their food, and thus must do battle with, and protect themselves from, every meal they ever consume.

Hey Weight Watchers -- and yes, you too Barkely -- "cut the effing crap, and 'man up' by choosing a big salad, some vegetarian soup and a glass of water."

And leave the rest of us in peace!

Or continue being a total jerk-off, by lying to, and brow beating, everyone with deleterious directions intended to belittle people into buying your despicable products.

Both have consequences. You decide which you are comfortable dealing with.

But don't blame anyone but yourself for what you get.

It truly is remarkable how disconnected and delusional so many of this world's establishment-appointed officials have become. And Bashar al Assad is, most certainly, one of the more delapidated minds to inhabit what are becoming some of history's most audaciously-animalistic heads of state.

There are many facets of feeble intellect to discuss in the analysis of Assad. And the majority of them are direct results of an alienated self image. This image also acquiring an esoteric persona, resulting from long periods of mental lethargy in a sterlized environment.

If a person's intellectual capacities and fortitudes are not challenged daily, then the sociological and existential tools of perception become dull and brittle.

In Assad's case, his experiences with powers, absent equal degrees of authority -- thus, essentially unauthorized -- have manifest a quizzically obtuse directorate in the engagement of his duties.

Which means that delegation of authority will -- for the most part -- be his chosen form of leadership. Inspirational orations or actions will never be his strong suit.

Therefore, in formulating an opening assessment of the strategies required to expeditiously bring the Assad regime into compliance with International Law and human rights, one must first focus on the propensities of those who inhabit the structure's of his power circles.

It is also wise to begin investigating exactly how and why loyalties are formed, and what actions or events typically erode them.

The Assad regime quite obviously operates within, and upon, a heirarchy of expressive misinformation; with the left hand -- at key periods -- unsure of what the right is doing. And relies heavily on both support, and perceptions of support, at all levels.

This is, of course, why defections cause such critical damage within the Assad Regime. Loyalty is the only currency of value in this type of mechanism. Which leaves Assad at a great disadvantage, and forces him to ignore many aspects of meritorious contribution inherent to almost every link in his chain of command.

The mortar, so to speak, that binds the Syrian Goverment's security forces together is a poorly concocted mixture of incentive and idealism. And thus is severely distorted in its objectives. Which is the primary reason why its activities will become increasingly more criminal as its improprieties are exposed.

There is no true discipline in the regime, owing to the stated objectives being such that they push far beyond the boundaries of natural human compunction. And therefore, defiance and illusion become the image of choice amongst the majority of those who are not courageous enough to follow their conscience, and defect.

The international community which opposes the brutal and oppressive actions of the Assad regime -- that being most of the world -- have little choice but to become physically active in their insistence that he cease and desist all military attacks. Whether inside, near to, or beyond, his nation's borders.

However, the majority of the actions can be reserved to those of 'threat and negotiation'. Since it is clear that there are many areas of structural weakness in the Assad regime that most any internationally devised offensive can capitalize on.

The Syrian military is, as reported, well heeled, and thus always a threat to any nation which elects to engage them with ultimatums. They are supported by various Russian and Chinese diplomatic structues, Iranian powers and sectarian alliances.

The Assad Regime's stated aims are to quell the alleged uprising of civilians in its own nation.

Meaning that terrorism governs the Syrian Army's primary modes of operation. Which, of course, sounds rather comical in light of the many statements of the Assad Regime, and Syrian State Television, which invariably blame almost all of the bloodshed on "armed terrorists".

Regardless of the fact that Assad claims to be fighting some mythical force of international alliance within his borders, no corroborative reports of any such activity exist. Nor is there any evidence being offered which outlines exactly who, or what, this alleged alliance consists of.

Retrospectively, the Assad Regime actually can show clear acts of terrorism, and its perpetrators at work. Because the Syrian military is almost exclusively populated by those who are willing to employ threats of deadly force -- accompanied by a show of capability -- in an effort to acquire a desired response from its victims. This being the basic interpretation of "terrorism", it finds the Assad Regime guilty by admission.

The people are not simply being asked, or forced, to engage in some commiserate or contractual duty. They are not even being instructed to comply with operational constructs of political or social order.

Neither is the regime fighting to protect itself from an imminent threat of physical destruction, or engaging in military actions that protect the people of the nation from the same.

The Assad Regime's only objective is to force the majority of the population into compliance with its demands. And chooses to do so by employing threats and violence. This unequivocally defines its actions to be that of a terrorist organization. And, little, if anything else.

Posse Comatatus is a legislative statute which prohibits the deployment of American troops on American soil. All activities of law enforcement and peace keeping fall within the jurisdiction of the civilian sector. And this equanimity is critical to maintianing a respectable and reasonable society.

However, in the nation of Syria, there is no such jurisdictional accord with the people. There appears to be no structural integrity in the system because the society is at the mercy of a governance enforced by only those who are not bound to social norms, and thus are not reuired to respect or engage the people on a level playing field of equally shared sovereignty.

The Assad Regime, a by-product of his father's 30 year reign, is inherently infantile in its intentions, and insensitively impetuous from its inception. It is the product of callous disregard for merit that has been partitioned into cascading levels of sectarian divide, stacked like autocratic excrements of loyalty and corruption.

Moreover, this sordid structure is one which clearly seeks to indemnify human rights abuses with authoritative claims that exist as little more than fanatical misrepresentations of fabled lore. Elevating policies of mere personal aspiration to statutory rules of complicitous fratricide, blurring the reflection of law in the turbid pools of religiousity that created them.

So much of the Middle East region has been blinded by visions of mystical morbidity, and senile supremacy, devolving the expanse of political habitation into a xenophobic zoo. A den of self-styled cages harboring the hearts of hatred. Shepherding the minds of madness into the fields of war. Exacting revenge and remuneration with little or no regard for human life. Rewarding the remedial ranks of recidivism with ignorant impetus.

Bashar al Assad is one of many monarchial metastasies of severely deficient representation. His role as the president of Syria does not comply with any known formulae of leadership. And he is quite literally lacking in almost every area of Stately intellect and experience.

He appears to be educated -- of some sort -- on what leads a man to action. But obviously, has absolutely no idea what drives him to it.

Without the intuitive field of peripheral vision at his disposal, he has no true ability to lead anyone. But, on the contrary, can only cultivate exclusive delineations of desperate intent among the ranks of those he intends to hide behind.

What becomes quite apparent -- presenting diplomatic questions of its own -- is that the Assad Regime is hobbled by a dearth of credible intelligence. Whether it concerns the actions of its professed enemies and opponents, the operations of its security forces, or the media storm swarming around its activities. The Assad Regime seems to be rather oblivious to much of it.

Which, as one may readily realize, poses significant obstacles to political endeavors meant to consolidate this intelligence in such a manner as to present it with some expectation of success in evoking a reasonable response of restraint from Assad.

Assad is obviously operating under select beliefs, rather than reports. Which complicates matters for him strategically. Due to his political and bureaucratic engagements being summarily confined to re-action rather than action. Subjective rather than objective. Since this fatal defect places him in a perilous position from which to engage in battle with the intellectuals of the world. Whether diplomatically or militarily.

In all reality, Assad is about as difficult a foe as Qaddafi was. And while his regime may be somewhat more entrenched than Qaddafi's, it is no better equipped in the areas of tactical ambition or strategic expertise.

An air campaign, while a bit more costly than that which was employed in Libya, would be an even more effective deterrant to Assad's operations than it was to Qaddafi's.

As far as Iran's involvment in the Syrian crackdown, its influence becomes decreasingly effective as more nations join in international accord against the brutality of the Assad Regime.

Iran can certainly be a pain in the neck. However, it has often proven to be a rather reasonably motivated force on the world stage. Especially considering that nation's many non-initiated clashes with various neighbors.

Some of Iran's troubles also stem from its leadership's often stated objective of toppling the primacy of the "petro dollar". Effectively ensconcing them with the lable of "rogue nation", without them having ever made a military move or taken an indiscriminately-threatening posture in world events.

Furthermore, Iran's history of ties to Russia and China were absurdly fulminated in the near and distant past, into explosively charged accusations of collaborative primacy by fear-mongering hawks who beat the drums of war, requesting excessive levels of authority that enabled them to employ invasive meddling in sovereign, foreign affairs of state.

This form of malfeasance eventually helped to create intrusive national security agencies, which demanded access to the fray -- and still do -- through the use of clearly indiscriminate violence and malevolence, thus effectively shielding various actors and actions in these typically secret -- and secretly sanctioned -- operations, while simultaneously unearthing violent conflict of a nearly ghostly decadence.

The international stage has since been haunted by apparitions of atrocity. A theatre of acrimonious actors possessed by pontificating demons of deadly deception. Clutching the breast of agonizing irony as invisible blades slice at the heart of honor, its anemic arteries in ribbons; splattering the canvas of yet another portrait of human progress with the rusty stains of the art of war.

Iran is just one of several evolving specters of Middle Eastern conflict. And is no more sporadic in its actions and acquisitions than most any other regional reprobate of significant military capability.

The Middle Eastern debacle has become most synonymous with a quarrel between three orphans whom are trapped with their hands in the cookie jar. All warring against eachother over seven cookies. Each clutching two, as the trio clamors to claim the final crumbling treat. Punching and kicking one another, screaming at their inability to remove their bulging fists...as the headmaster approaches.

Not one of them willing to settle for just the single cookie that they rightfully deserve, enabling them to extract their fist from the jar. But instead, demand a satiated level of personally idealized success, embracing deadly excess, their cold clutches soon to be their ultimate undoing.

The analogy is an old and accurate one. And the Assad Regime is a clear example of its reflective by-products. A hate-child conceived of nearly two hundred years of contemporary, criminal copulation swelling in the bosom of the Middle East.

Now, Assad's forces openly attack its nation's own citizens from excessively exposed positions. Typically ringing some unfortunate civilian area such as a city or town, as they -- like a bunch of moronic cowards -- shell it mercilously. Hitting the "biblical hooch", and hooting at the opportunity to engage in acts of indiscriminate violence against women and children.

Be assured that a few proximate explosions of significant force would promote a change in strategy quite quickly. And would inspire more cognizant listening skills on the part of Assad.

Internationally coordinated military action designed to end the massacre by Assad's Regime, would not only send a clear message that the world is becoming entirely intolerant of the tyrants who have usurped powers that were never afforded them. It would also strengthen the resolve and reach of the many liberators who are often thwarted in their efforts to encourage the majority to openly discourage the creation of despotic leadership in their own geographical locations.

The international community must act to prove that this world's peoples are serious in their efforts to end the 'tolerance of abuse' that so often turns apathy into the most effective weapon in the torture and murder of innocent human beings.

We can no longer look away...

The abuse of human rights -- in any form -- will alwyas exist on par with that of a criminal endeavor. And thus habitate the core of all processes of intentional catharsis that have as their express purpose, one of extracting unauthorized realms of leadership. Embodying a securement of power, absent responsibility, representation or reason. And thus a clear grasp for socially sadistic supremacy and destructively delusional domination.

The "jig is up" in many respects, because the people of the world are beginning to understand that it is necessary to look beyond the imagery ... and imagine.

A better today. A brighter tomorrow. Lit by the flame of freedom. Passed from individual to individual. A sea of light glowing with currents of personal accountability and uncommon valor, flowing seamlessly into the eye of tyranny, blinding it forever.

Fate, as it would be, itself doom's the Assad regime.

There are seldom human abuses in the world which skew the ire of onlookers to the extent that they come to define the carnage with redolence, and remorseless rebuffs against the victims. Except, of course, when they occur during failing administrations, such as that presided over by the likes of George W. Bush, and Barack Obama.

Remarkably, the tremendously brutal and barbaric actions of the Assad regime -- a criminal element that is torturing, maiming and murdering civilians in Syria on a daily basis -- are being idealized and indemnified by so many who would refuse assistance to these people, lest it become an action of undisciplined violence, lorded and forded by the criminal consequence of exploitive abusers, soon to become that which they were sent to protect against.

It is no secret that American Military Personnel are responsible for countless civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. Innocent men, women and children -- yes, little school girls, and boys; babies and such -- murdered at the behest of, yet another, criminal regime. Callous and reckless reprobates whom, somehow, saw fit to bombard civilian areas, and send rockets and mortars crashing into homes and work places, in their efforts to allegedly rid these countries of what they deem to be "insurgents".

Not criminals. Not terrorists. For if their victims were to be labled as such, then one would require conclusive evidence to prove these allegations.

No, just insurgents. The "other team", so to speak. Not necessarily persons of criminal intent themselves. Nor even guilty of ever having committed any crime. Just those which the United States Government has declared are its "enemies".

Much like the enemies of Israel. Displaced and debased families that were marginalized by those who use  babies and children as human shields during armed clashes with them.

How could they not have enemies? And many of them?

Which brings everyone, once again, to the subject of "demarcation".

What so many minsconstrue, and re-draw, as simple lines of battle, where collateral damage exists on par with reasonable force. Reciting memes of chattle, indicting the region for its professed bloodlust, calling all of common skin to the altar. Sacrificing the mortal coil in supplicance to the sport of war -- is not that of "demarcation".

Those who define this tactical border in such idiotic terms, abide not the trenches and fences that criss-cross and divide expanses of unrefined real estate. They feed not at the fabled tables of weathered warcraft, bordered by blackened skirts, ringed by the caterers of death whom trade in bombs and bullets, spilling only the blood of the insane and simple minded.

For the new image of war, with its sentimental sanctimony but an apalling mendacity, was never -- nor shall ever become -- anything but a nascent and nearsighted denial of fortune. A refusal to reconcile upon commonly misplaced defenses. A grafting and grisly grasp for more.

Never willing to share the efforts of error, or recount professed proficiencies and inept inefficiencies as the collective instruments of human activity they always are.

No, it is quite obvious that those who now control of the governance of this species, are mere collaborators whom have come to loath -- yeah, mortally despise -- any admissions of error or ineptitude. And instead, callously opted for expressly destructive and complex manifestations of matriculation and misogony, in an effort to merely maintain their positions of authority.

The monstrosities occurring in Syria are a direct reflection of those which have occurred in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, and so many other war-torn regions that have become nothing more than the manifestations of the morbid mentalities of those whom were to invited to shed the blood so easily.

The spoils of war have become a common inspiration, as the criminal minds of history have led the slaughter into the houses of the innocent. Bursting through the doors of domiciles with menacing intent. Crushing their thresholds into the dusky, and deathly dust tracked into so many peaceful homes. Proving that naked aggression was never the unavoidable treachery-of-last-resort it is so often claimed to be.

In contemporary humanity, it is fully understood, just exactly what is at stake when a nation invades another nation.

There are not morals and ideals hanging in the balance. Nor any truly honorable mention to place upon the bowls of the scale.

No, it is now, as it almost always has been, about mere looting and pilliaging by the pompously perverse. Stately wastes of warbling sycophants, so often left to the devices of the misled. Spurred on by corrosively collective angst. Drawn to the depths by morbid curiosity. Reduced to destroying the lives of those they were sworn to defend. Drinking of the crimson cup, till they thirst for little more than vengeance and vanity, and the end of days.

Every molecule of intrinsic idealism is destroyed on the war-scorched battlefields. All certainties of conscience are left to die in the dust of its scattered remains. Once powerful charms, withered by loyalties and lust.

Now, we meet again at the crossroads of blindness. Signs of mere mollification and mystery pointing into the unknown. Testaments of the turbid and truculent tragedy etched into the roads, deepened in the torrents of tyranny, sucking humanity's turning wheels into them like ruts of fate.

Shall this polarity again, of but nepotist necromancy and nihilism, shun the terror of its foolishness? Writhing in agony as the flames lick upon its spineless back? Turning from the horror, to become it?

Or will this next action be one of recompense? One of shame and remorse at the sight of what this species' fanatical fratricide has unearthed.

Shall this new day be illuminated by the candle of conflict alone? Or will this nation's leaders allow the flame of freedom to be snuffed out once again, by the galling gusts of greed that pant and chant along the borders of violence, seething with seditious intent. Conscripting the corrupt and their carpetbaggers who lay, salivating over the opportunity to subdue the exhausted and infirmed of both victor and vanquished?  

Can the administration of Barack Obama actually engage Syria with obligatory auditions? Can this adminstration actually do its job, and offer a realistic remuneration for the decades, upon decades, of unjustified and poorly motivated violence and vindictiveness thrown into the region like corroding acids?

Can Obama actually operate in a realm of intuitive morality and just evocation, that evolves upon a course of action which manifests outcomes that are in the best interests of the American people? While simultaneously respecting and honoring the concerns of those this nation has so often, even unwittingly, deemed its interminable "enemies"?

Does the Obama administration have the courage to meet the abuses of the Assad regime, with equal admissions of improprieties on his own part? Or will Obama merely continue his denial of any wrongdoing, furthering the criminality began by George W. Bush?

Simply pointing the finger of accusation at Assad does not guarantee an admission of his guilt, nor any abatement of his criminality. Especially considering the very real fact that Obama is equally guilty of crimes against humanity. As well as others in this nation.

Certainly, Assad is a despicable and desperate individual who hasn't the mental fortitude of a dung pile. However, there are few in the halls of leadership who can claim to offer much more.

Hillary Clinton is, herself, a criminal. And a clearly delusional malcontent who has been tapped to deliver ultimatums and threats to other nations, feeding on frenzy and war.

Who can trust her to credibly engage the people of this nation when her idealistic vision is one which would find America populated by a sea of sheeple who comply with forced vaccinations, or can be convinced to brainwash their own children, and live in a society that would require degrees from 'Public Service Institutions' in order to become politically active.

Yet, she still insists on engaging the international community under the guise of a person who respects "freedom" and the aspirations of the "individual".

Anyone with a third grade education, and a clear view of the mean streets, can see through her pestering plagiarism like a pane of glass. Just who the heck does Hillary she think she is? Does she even have the ability to see herself in a realistic light?

Furthermore, just who does she think she is talking to in her public addresses?

While many of Clinton's words are, on their face, laudible. The fact is that she does not equally afford them their rightful place in the lists of reasonable rectification. Merely spouting threats and ultimatums at the expense of those who will be requied to mechanize her words into actions, does not express the true complexity of the matters she has at her disposal. And she is doing herself, and this nation, a great disservice when she openly disputes the actions of Assad, without first exhausting all reasonable measures of diplomacy.

Moreover, her foes are not merely the ignorant and pliant, liberal constituents whom so unwittingly enabled her rise to Secretary of State. These men she now has in her crosshairs are not simply fun-loving, good-natured people that she can manipulate with her doldrums and simple sensitivities.

These people are the product of a long history of disuse, brutality and neglect. They are also audaciously motivated. To be perfectly clear: there is often no meaning to their madness. It is simply madness. And its origin is steeped in hatred for those who conscripted and complicated their abuse through asinine levels of irresponsible indemnification.

Now, while in all fairness, one must admit that Hillary Clinton likely does possess some ability to properly negotiate a cease fire, and cultivation of a progressive government in Syria. The primary dsyfunction is that she has, as of yet, to prove she possess the courage to?

Unfortunately, the Democrat party -- typically slithering below the banner of sympathy -- has never been one to be defined by its courage.

Yet, the contemporary processes of international debate, and matters of state now truly hinge on the political parlances of a distracted and largely discheveled party of wimperng liberals, who can find an enemy in anyone.

Is it really so wise to allow the lackidaisical Democrats to bear the entire weight of conflict in a region which has not one concern for this party's personal aspirations? Nor can ever truly connect with the leaders it presents them with?

Neither pity nor pressure will win this battle. Just as surely as tenacity and compassion will not lose it.

The Arab Spring is a reality that will come to change the face of humanity's progress upon this planet.

Now the current administrations of the international commuinty have been granted the opportunity to make history, and bring about a new era of accountability, as it so effusively claims to wish for.

Unfortunately, they, of lethargy and listless lament, gathering at the armory once again, see not their own dark sparks shooting from the cracks of the Assad regime. They now propose to extricate the bones from their body evidence. Slicing through sinews of savagery. Strumming the solemn spikes of chivalry  which have since been spun to singing threads of steel, screeching their peeling screams as melodies upon the instruments of malevolence -- exploding in tumultuous tunes. Engulfing the atmosphere with the scintillating smoke and mirrors of those who divide amongst them.

They have all become whispers of the fallen. Shadows of the structures they defile. Wasted breath from the mouths of babes. And the world will tolerate their deprecating distractions no longer.

The levels of criminality and human rights violations erupting from the war-wrecked areas of the world are alarming. And trafficking in humans is the fastest growing criminal market in the areas of Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, The West Bank and so many others as a result of hiring foreigners to man the posts of the alleged peace-keeping forces.

The torture and horrifying enslavement of women and children by those operating under U.N. immunity, and in tandem with British based, corporate security forces, is one of the most odious and alarming trends to evolve out of the agreements of international accord. And this can no longer be allowed to proliferate.

Yes, violent self-defense is often required to thwart criminality and despotism. For. truly, the voice of aggression must be silenced forever. Assad and his regime can no longer be allowed to murder and attack innocent civilians, or his own country. Regardless of his stated intentions or insinuations of warranting offenses.

They engage in nothing short of shameful and cowardly acts of recidivism, when leaders murder those whom have come to entrust them with their safety and civility. And the Assad regime is not only a callous catastrophe of civil destruction. He has also created the most despicable of militaries, owing to a commander that routinely demands the execution of his own security forces, if and when they refuse to carry-out unlawful orders, such as being instructed to shoot the unarmed and innocent citizens they have promised to protect and defend.

The massacre must end. Now!

However, to merely restucture the abuse in such a way as to transfer it onto the breaking backs of the women and children of these regions is nothing short of MONSTROUS!!!

Should that this administration, and congress, would rise to the challege. Forging the way forward with the international community, in respect of the citizens first. Not the fighters or diplomats, but in the best interests of the people they are charged with representing.

This nation's leaders must regain the trust of the world, and inspire all involved to work together within the confines of indefatigable honor for their true oaths of office. Moving to render actions which can return to the peoples of the Middle East -- physically and emotionally -- what is rightfully theirs. And thereby doing, do so for much of the rest of the world.

May grace and courage and honor lead the way...

Invariably, the best way to tell if a public figure, such as a politician, actor, writer, talk show host, whatever, is a conservative republican, is if they have -- at some point in their career -- apologized publicly for having blurted out some smarmy morsel of logical fact that the average flittering, self-abosrbed liberal democrat gets all in-a-tizzy about.

That is, as long as it is not the self-professed "progressives" who are responsible for the inflammatory speech.

Sure, Limbaugh sunk a bit below the belt in his vulgar use of the term "slut". But, truth be told, there are plenty of girls who will admit they are a slut. Not to mention the fact that they are often proud of it. You know, being a "player" and all.

As well. There are plenty of women who will wear T-shirts labeling themselves as "little devils". And even shirts that tout an oft-expressed term "That's right, I am a bitch".

Women even routinely wear pants that force people to read her butt cheeks. Words like "Pink" and "Juicy".

Truly, what was Sandra Fluke so upset about?

Furthermore, why does she fire back with statements such as "I won't be silenced". As if anyone was telling her to shut up. No, she was just being held accountable for her statements.

Not to mention the fact that she is not a 23-year-old little sprout, as has been claimed. She is actually a 30-year-old, hard-core activist.

But, no apologies for that bit of deception and mendacious martydome on the part of the Libs.

There were also never any apologies offered from the Democrats after they openly published comments blaming Sarah Palin for the Tucson shooting rampage that injured congresswoman Giffords, and killed a young school girl.

Nor have there been any apologies offered from CNN opinion writers who almost daily publish articles blatantly calling Republican presidential contenders "raists", claiming that they "hate Hispanic people", and the poor.

Regardless of the fact that one of the nation's most honorable and dependable congressmen, Dr. Ron Paul -- who hasn't a racist bone in his body -- is one of only four Republicans in the race.

Democrats routinely, verbally fantasize about the slow and painful, or early, deaths of their rivals -- such as Rush Limbaugh. And they do so on radio programs, nationally televised talk shows such as "The View", and in print.

However, they rarely, if ever, will apologize for any of their poor behavior. And why? Because they are so often pitied and protected by so many who are simply too emotionally involved in the average idealistic extemist's causes.

It's always about the poor homosexuals, or the poor minorities, or the poor people period, for the liberals.

These people don't really much find a need to actually be against anything. It's always about protagonism for them.

Which, of course exposes why they are generally so narcissistic in nature. Always insisting that their poor behaviors are justifiable, because they claim the big, bad conservatives are just armored bullies who want to pick on all of the scantilly clad liberals who "wouldn't hurt a fly".

So it goes.

The Republicans get all of the flack, as usual. But for one reason only. The Democrats are always such hypocritical "wussies" who can never take what they dish-out.

Amazingly enough, a third-year law student, Sandra Fluke, is claiming she is "outraged" at being called exactly what she has openly insinuated she is -- "a slut".

It appears that Rush Limbaugh, who made the comment on his radio show, is as fed-up as this author when it comes to the air of unaccountability so many women hide behind these days. Presenting themselves as victims simply because they are being asked to "drop the K-Y and step away from the money".

While it can be argued that Fluke is merely an activist who's primary goal is to bring light to a subject of alleged discriminatory bias against women, and their right to do whatever they want with their bodies.

The truth of the matter is that her overall thesis on the subject of contraception is peppered with inferences of promiscuity and neglect.

Which, as one can logically expect, draws fire from those who are becoming increasingly disugsted with the expanding atmosphere of sexual excess emanating from a majority of the female population in America.

When I was growing up, the primary allocation of gender relations were almost exclusively reserved by those communications and behaviors which could be clearly defined as existing in utter respect and protection of the woman's prerogatives.

Essentially because it was still believed -- however unwittingly -- that girls were made-up of "sugar and spice, and everything nice".

Unfortunately, in the depraved, post-Madonna world of "Express Yourself" (as long as it is sexually) as time wore on, and male bashing became an art form that a great many men were in no way deserving of. And the manipulated atmosphere of male-perpetrated spousal abuse and lack of commitment began to crumble under the systematic "cry wolf" strategy that so many women have employed. And, prostitution, sexually explicit female attire, pornography, abortion, contraception and promiscuity gained traction with the female gender -- the response by men has become increasingly derogatory in its vernacular.

Not to mention the expressly demoralizing and disrespectful language spewing from the average rap or hip-hop album. Songs about pedophilia, perversion, excess, hate and anger against women.

Which, remarkably, are often lauded by droves of mentally infected females who are now behaving even more perverse in reciprocation. Considering themselves somehow vindicated and validated by a seedy atmosphere which lauds their sexual depravity as some form of individual freedom.

When, in all actuality. The overtly promiscuous and sexually charged characters of today's women are not in any way an act of empowerment. They are merely complacent behaviors of a weakened mentality, wherein those following this path of lasciviousness are merely cowtowing to their carnal desires, in complete abandon, and in denial of humanity's natural propensity to seek much more creative and constructive erudations of existence.

Fluke has, herself brought the label of "slut" into her argument, and upon her. It was she who admitted to having "spent thousands of dollars on contraception". Exposing herself to be so sexually active that it is difficult to think she had time to do anything else.

That is, of course, if one were to actually believe that there were no difference between women and men. Or that women do not naturally exist in a different atmosphere than men, and thus must act accordingly.

While it can be said that human compunction is the primary derivative of social interaction. The fact is that natural propensities of a corporeal nature still drive much of the sexual activities of the species.

And thus, women will always find it much, much easier to "get laid", so to speak.

So, the fact that Fluke is a "slut", really is not much of a surprise. Which causes one to wonder what she is so offended by?
Is it merely the word itself? Or the exposure of her own lack of a personal character that would inspire her to keep her legs closed, and seek some other -- more evolving and progressive -- activities to engage in so often.

Truly, how well can women expect to evolve if they continue to degrade in an environment that rewards them for their lack of compunction?